Renormalization is an ensemble of techniques which serves to treat the infinities which appear in quantum field theory or statistical mechanics.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

1
vote
1answer
47 views

Structure of Mass Renormalisation

I'm currently working on the renormalisation part in Peskin, Schroeder QFT. There it is stated that non-logarithmic UV divergences give a mass renormalisation and thus are forbidden, e.g. for the ...
0
votes
0answers
36 views

Divergent diagrams in QED

I was reading about how to choose divergent diagrams in QED by using the concept of Superficial degree of divergence. We have an empirical relation $$ D= 4-E_b -\frac{3}{2}E_f $$ where $E_b$ is number ...
2
votes
0answers
55 views

Is a lagrangian with a background field interaction renormalizable ? If yes, when?

Consider the Lagrangian, $$ L = -\partial_{\mu} \chi \partial_{\nu} \chi^{\dagger} - m^2 \chi \chi^{\dagger} + g\chi \chi^{\dagger}\phi,$$ where $\phi$ is a background field and $\chi$ is a complex ...
1
vote
1answer
72 views

Cutoff-dependent “inverse propagator” for renormalization

In Zee's QFT in a Nutshell, when introducing mass renormalization, he calculates the "inverse propagator" for a $\phi^4$ scalar field theory to order $\lambda^2$ by considering the two diagrams shown: ...
6
votes
1answer
344 views

Counterterm Lagrangian and Renormalisation?

I am going through the notes on QFT by M. Srednicki (online: http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/qft.html), and I am having a hard time to understand the "renormalised" Lagrangian. Consider a Klein-...
7
votes
0answers
55 views

Why would renormalization be necessary without divergent integrals? [duplicate]

Weinberg uses the LSZ reduction formula to introduce field renormalization,and on page 441, he says: As this discussion should make clear: the renormalization of masses and fields has nothing to ...
5
votes
1answer
197 views

Will Anderson's Poor Man's Scaling loose its effect when band width is small?

The s-d interaction Hamiltonian is as fellows $H_I=Js.S$, J is the coupling strength. We focus on the antiferromagnetic case, where $J>0$. According Anderson's poor man's scaling, the ...
0
votes
0answers
26 views

Resummation of large logarithms in effective field theory

I am trying to learn about the ideas of large-logarithms in effective field theory from a set of notes. However the following paragraph is confusing me: This doesn't seem quite right to me. Surely ...
3
votes
1answer
169 views

What is the problem with quantizing GR in the Effective Field Theory approach?

In the modern view due to Wilson, the cut-off $\Lambda$ is an intrinsic property of a theory and renormalization just means that the theory is invariant under scale transformations below $\Lambda$. ...
3
votes
0answers
51 views

Running coupling, effective potential and the stability of vacuum

Consider the potential $$V(\phi)=\frac{1}{2}\mu^2\phi^2+\lambda\phi^4$$ where $\phi=\phi(t,\textbf{x})$ is a real scalar field. Let, $\mu^2<0$ and $\lambda>0$ then the potential is bounded from ...
1
vote
0answers
63 views

Questions about the beta function in QFT

When someone defines $\beta(g)=\mu\frac{dg}{d\mu},\quad (1)$ he is implicitly assuming that the result of the rhs of this equation can be written only in terms of $g$ instead of $\mu$, which is not ...
6
votes
3answers
167 views

Are the bare parameters of a renormalizable field theory infinitesimal or infinite?

I think this should be an easy question. Several sources I've read say that the bare parameters in a quantum field theory are "infinite" so that the renormalized values are "finite". However, in ...
3
votes
3answers
256 views

Difference between DMRG (density matrix renomalization group) and MPS (matrix product states)?

I am learning DMRG recently. I noticed there are many papers both in the DMRG approach and MPS (such as variational matrix product state (VMPS) by F.Verstraete and J.I.Cirac) approach. In my eyes, ...
3
votes
0answers
69 views

Why is quantising gravity so difficult? [duplicate]

Since gravity is so similar with the Yang-Mills theory, the Christoffel connection is the gauge potential, the Riemann curvature is the field strength, then why is quantising gravity so difficult when ...
4
votes
0answers
66 views

What should I think of a diverging beta function (in Renormalisation Group flow)?

I have written a set of RG flow equations using Functional Renormalisation Group methods. I am looking at the flow of a well known problem with an additional original coupling. I did not do anything ...
1
vote
1answer
83 views

Meaning of counterterms and quantum corrections

When one talks about the “classical Lagrangian” of a field, does one mean the tree-level Lagrangian with physical masses and physical couplings? If yes, does it therefore mean that the bare Lagrangian ...
4
votes
2answers
147 views

Top quark mass $m_t$ at energy scales $\mu < m_t$?

Edit - Maybe formulated differently: Does it make sense to talk about the top mass at energies below $m_t$, although in all processes the corresponding energy scale is above $m_t$, because of the rest ...
1
vote
1answer
90 views

Dimensional Regularization for $\phi 4$ theory

When using dimensional Regularization for $\phi 4$ theory to calculate the running of the mass, why there is no quadratic divergence as expected? For details, cf https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/...
1
vote
1answer
138 views

What is “the scale at which a theory is defined”?

I'm trying to learn the renormalization group, but I am confused about renormalization schemes. The general idea of RG is that physical predictions are independent of "the scale at which a theory is ...
3
votes
2answers
132 views

How do people go about looking for asymptotic safety in quantum gravity?

Do we have (proposed?) methods to look for fixed points in the renormlaization group flow of the Einstein-Hilbert action? My understanding of the RG is still somewhat sketchy at this point and I am ...
1
vote
0answers
14 views

Numerically extracting free energy in renormalization procedure

I have some doubts about how to apply real space renormalization numerically. I understand the theoretical concept, and how we require $Z'=Z$, being $Z'$ the partition function of the renormalized ...
0
votes
1answer
60 views

Computing the pole mass from a given $\overline{MS}$ mass?

Given a Yukawa coupling as a function of scale $\mu$ and a vev, therefore $m_R(μ)=Y(μ)⟨ϕ⟩$, how can I compute the corresponding pole mass $m_p$? Relations I was able to find are (page 39) $$m_p=m_R−Σ(...
3
votes
1answer
91 views

Renormalisation group equation for Green's functions

The renormalization group equations for the $n$-point Green’s function $$\Gamma(n) = \langle \psi_{x_1} \dots \psi_{x_n}\rangle $$ in a four-dimensional massless field theory are $$\mu \frac{d}{d \mu}...
0
votes
0answers
51 views

Mass of an imaginative stable top quark at low energies? [duplicate]

Masses are not fixed quantities, but change with energy because of the renormalization group running. These can be calculated in a given renormalization scheme, for example, the MS scheme: Imagine ...
1
vote
3answers
85 views

What are the six quark mass values when extrapolated to Planck energy?

Let us assume that the standard model is correct up to Planck mass. (Yes, I know, this is a big assumption.) If we continue the running of quark masses with energy (due to renormalization), what are ...
3
votes
1answer
98 views

On the c-theorem

I have been reading a few papers on CFT and AdS/CFT regarding the c-theorem and I have a few questions regarding c-theorems: a) Why is it that the c-theorem is usually considered for only unitary ...
1
vote
0answers
47 views

Continuous renormalisation

In Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, M.D. Schwartz talks about how Wilsonian renormalisation relates to continuous renormalisation. He states that continuous renormalisation looks a ...
1
vote
1answer
61 views

W and Z boson masses' running neglected?

Since the Lagrangian mass term of $W$ boson involves the bare coupling $g$, it cannot be the measured mass. Then the measured mass will "run" with momentum transferred. But everywhere I look the "...
8
votes
1answer
465 views

Renormalization group resummation

I'm having trouble in understeanding a mathematical feature of RG, namely how it provides a way to resum the perturbation series and how that's defined mathematically. From a conceptual point of view ...
3
votes
1answer
186 views

How can we calculate pion decay constant in Chiral Perturbation Theory ?

Above diagram is an one-loop contribution to the Pion decay constant $f_\pi$. For example in this paper (Eq.7) they have written down the pion decay constant to one loop, but the calculation is not ...
6
votes
0answers
81 views

Understanding the $\phi^4$ phase diagram

I'm having trouble making sense of this phase diagram. The model is a $V(\phi)=g_2 \phi^2+g_4\phi^4$ scalar field theory. Here's what I think I understand: the capital letters represent different ...
2
votes
1answer
65 views

Callan-Symanzik equation for the QCD scattering cross section of the $e^{-}e^{+}\to q\bar{q}$ process

In Peskin and Schroeder (Section 17.2) it is stated without derivation that the scattering cross section for the $e^{-}e^{+}\to q\bar{q}$ process obeys the following Callan-Symanzik equation: $$ \left[...
9
votes
2answers
435 views

Peskin's book page 334 proof of $Z_1=Z_2$ to all orders in QED perturbation theory

Peskin in his QFT page 334 argued that $Z_1=Z_2$ to all orders in QED perturbation theory, but I couldn't understand his argument: ... With a generalization of the argument given there (section 7....
4
votes
1answer
102 views

Superficial degree of divergence on Weinberg

Reading volume 1 of Weinberg's QFT book, chapter 12, page 505 he says that if you consider a diagram with degree of divergence $D\geq{}0$, its contribution can written as a polynomial of order $D$ in ...
4
votes
1answer
65 views

Energy scale dependence of coupling constants

I am trying to understand the meaning of the renormalization group equation and what i have understood is that, since observable (or physical?) quantities must not depend on arbitrary energy scales, ...
0
votes
1answer
276 views

RGEs of the MSSM - problems with Mathematica

I'm having some troubles with the trilinear soft couplings of the MSSM RGEs. I've used the ones written in Martin's supersymmetry primer and I run them using mathematica, if I do so without taking ...
1
vote
2answers
121 views

Logarithmic discretization in Anderson´s model

Is there some motivation for the construction of Ladder operator that compound the recursive halmitonian of the Anderson model for numerical renormalization contained is this paper?
1
vote
1answer
80 views

“Irreversibility” of the RG flow

In his remarkable work, Zamolodchikov proved a theorem regarding two dimensional QFT Renormalization Group (RG) flow, describing a monotonically decreasing function in the flow parameter which is ...
2
votes
2answers
63 views

Around fixed point of renormalization group

In the general formulation of renormalization group in "statistical mechanics" by P.K.Pathria, each point in parameter space is represented by a vector $\vec{K}$ and the transformed vector would be ...
1
vote
0answers
108 views

Field strength renormalization: going outside of Fock space? [closed]

When one talks about field strength renormalization, one defines the renormalized field $\psi^R(x)$ in the following way (I'm using the notation from Matthew Schwartz's book): $\psi^R(x) \equiv \frac{...
0
votes
0answers
60 views

Linear term in six dimensional $\phi^3$-theory

In our current QFT homework we are given the following Lagrangian in six spacetime dimensions. It is $$ \mathcal L = \frac12 [\partial \phi]^2 - c_0 \phi - \frac{m_0^2}2\phi^2 - \frac{g_0}{...
2
votes
0answers
51 views

S-matrix element for forward scattering and amputed green function

I'm studying dispersion relations applied as alternative method to perturbation theory from Weinberg's book (Vol.1) Let's consider the forward scattering in the lab frame of a massless boson of any ...
26
votes
4answers
1k views

Regularization of the Casimir effect

For starters, let me say that although the Casimir effect is standard textbook stuff, the only QFT textbook I have in reach is Weinberg and he doesn't discuss it. So the only source I currently have ...
2
votes
1answer
64 views

multi-dimensional renormalization group flow?

Suppose you have $\lambda \phi^3$ theory, and that you renormalize the 2 and 3 point one-particle irreducible graphs, $\Pi_R(p^2)$ and $\Gamma_R(p_1,p_2,p_3)$, by Taylor expanding about $p=\mu_0$ for ...
3
votes
0answers
59 views

Can the terms in the microscopic model with nonzero conformal spin generate some new term(s) under RG (renormalization group) flow?

As in the book Bosonization and Strongly Correlated Systems at page 66, it says that "We see that the original perturbation with nonzero conformal spin generates the perturbation with zero conformal ...
4
votes
1answer
294 views

A question about the implication of UV divergence in QFT

I have a basic question about the logic of renormalization in quantum field theory (QFT). We met the ultraviolet (UV) divergence in loop corrections. The standard argument is, our current field theory ...
1
vote
0answers
39 views

Renormalization Group Invariance of Scattering Amplitude

How can one show that the scattering amplitude is renormalization group invariant using the fact that the bare Green's function $G_0^{(n)}$ is renormalization group invariant? We have: $(1) \quad ...
1
vote
0answers
80 views

Am I understanding correctly the argument that leads to the need for field and mass renormalization?

I'm studying Quantum Field Theory from Weinberg's book, and I'm to the point where he introduces the concept of renormalization. I'd like to know if I'm getting the point that Weinberg makes when ...
0
votes
0answers
99 views

Physical meaning of Ward Identity and computing vertex functions

Following the derivation of Ward Identity by Weinberg book, you get it in the form $$ (l-k)_\mu S'(k)\Gamma^\mu(k,l)S'(l) = i S'(l) - iS'(k) $$ Can anyone explain the physical meaning of this ...
1
vote
1answer
59 views

Can I use Pauli-Villars and dimensional regularization together?

There are at least two ways to compute the electron-self energy. You can use Pauli-Villars or dimensional regularization, for example. On Weinberg's book, it's chosen the first method, while on my ...