Tagged Questions
0
votes
0answers
7 views
1D Kinematics - Relative Motion involving non-inertial frames of reference
I recently came across a question involving non-inertial frames of reference. I didn't quite understand the way it had been solved due to some conceptual confusion regarding certain deductions made to ...
0
votes
6answers
178 views
Inertial Frames of Reference - Inertial vs. Accelerated Frames
According to Robert Resnick's book "Introduction to Special Relativity", a line states the following as the definition of an inertial frame of reference: "We define an inertial system as a frame of ...
3
votes
2answers
880 views
How to deduce the theorem of addition of velocities?
Lorentz contraction and time dilatation can be deduced without Lorentz transformation. Can you deduce also the theorem of addition of velocities
$$w~=~\dfrac{u+v}{1+uv/c^2}$$
without Lorentz ...
4
votes
3answers
766 views
Is acceleration relative?
A while back in my Dynamics & Relativity lectures my lecturer mentioned that an object need not be accelerating relative to anything - he said it makes sense for an object to just be accelerating. ...
5
votes
2answers
196 views
Why absoluteness of time implies galilean transformations?
In Landau course, vol.1 Mechanics, one finds the statement: "...the absoluteness of time necessarily implies that the ordinary law of composition of velocities is applicable to all phenomena."
I ...
