Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is the theoretical framework describing the quantisation of classical fields which allows a Lorentz-invariant formulation of quantum mechanics. QFT is used both in high energy physics as well as condensed matter physics and closely related to statistical field theory. Use ...

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

4
votes
1answer
106 views

Is there a method which quantizes non-abelian gauge theories without path integrals formalism?

In the most QFT books there is a method of quantization of non-abelian theories through path integral methods. But I want to learn also the other methods without using of this formalism. Does anyone ...
1
vote
1answer
77 views

Instantons as a -1 dimensional object

I don't know much about Instantons, and looking through the Wiki page it seems like one must have a lot of knowledge about QFT to understand them. However recently I've encountered a statement (which ...
9
votes
2answers
180 views

Proof of Loss of Lorentz Invariance in Finite Temperature Quantum Field Theory

In the standard quantum field theory we always take the vacuum to be a invariant under Lorentz transformation. For simple cases, at least for free fields, is very simple to actually prove this. Now ...
6
votes
1answer
137 views

Spontaneous symmetry breaking and time-reversal symmetry

In most textbooks on field theory you read that "spontaneous symmetry breaking implies degeneracy of the ground state". (Like for example in ...
7
votes
1answer
231 views

Gauge Field Tensor from Wilson Loop

It is possible to introduce the gauge field in a QFT purely on geometric arguments. For simplicity, consider QED, only starting with fermions, and seeing how the gauge field naturally emerges. The ...
3
votes
0answers
61 views

What is the derivation of the speed of light $c$ that is not based on electromagnetism? [duplicate]

The "speed of light" is not just the speed of electromagnetic radiation, but of any massless particle. Therefore must not there be an expression for $c$ that is not in terms of $\mu_0$ and ...
1
vote
2answers
42 views

Logarithmic discretization in Anderson´s model

Is there some motivation for the construction of Ladder operator that compound the recursive halmitonian of the Anderson model for numerical renormalization contained is this paper?
4
votes
0answers
56 views

General relativity from helicity 2 massless field theory by using Deser's arguments

Recently I have discovered the method of constructing of GR from massless field with helicity 2 theory. It is considered here, in an article "Self-Interaction and Gauge Invariance" written by Deser S. ...
2
votes
0answers
81 views

Can we introduce the mass of a quantum field as an interaction?

At a free massless Lagrangian \begin{equation} L_0 = \frac 1 2 ( \partial \psi)^2 ,\end{equation} add an interaction term \begin{equation} L_I = \frac 1 2 m^2 \psi^2\end{equation} where m is small ...
1
vote
0answers
67 views

Normal ordering

If I understood correctly there are two terms called normal ordering: $:c c^\dagger: = c^\dagger c \hspace{.5cm}$so shifting all creation operators to the left and all annihilation operators to the ...
1
vote
0answers
14 views

Non Zero correlation function (for large separations) in one particle state?

So i computed the following equal time correlation function for a one particle state. The vacuum correlations give the function $$\langle \phi(\vec x)\phi(\vec y)\rangle_0=D(\vec x-\vec y)\\ ...
1
vote
0answers
35 views

Why only fully connected diagrams contribute to T matrix

In Peskin's introduction to QFT, he wrote: only fully connected diagrams, in which all external lines are connected to each other, contribute to the T matrix. I don't understand this ...
5
votes
0answers
37 views

Spin-dependence of the directionality of dipole radiation

I am interested in understanding how and whether the transformation properties of a (classical or quantum) field under rotations or boosts relate in a simple way to the directional dependence of the ...
3
votes
0answers
86 views

Variations of S-matrix functional and Feynman diagrams in Weinberg QFT

Weinberg on p. 287 of his QFT vol. 1 introduces the extended interaction operator: $$ \tag 1 \hat{V}(t) \to \hat{V}(t) + \sum_{a}\int d^{3}\mathbf x \hat{o}_{a}(\mathbf x ,t)\varepsilon_{a}(x). $$ ...
1
vote
0answers
42 views

How can one diagonalize the second variation of action?

Suppose we have action $S[q]$ and its stationary path $q_s$, I want to find the orthonormal paths $\psi_n$ that can diagonalize the second variation of the action $S[q]$. How to do that? Thanks
0
votes
0answers
35 views

Electron photon interaction potential in old fashioned perturbation theory (OFPT)

In this PDF on old fashioned perturbation theory (OFPT) we find from equation (14) the potential describing the interaction between the electron and photon: $$ V = \frac{1}{2}e \int \mathrm{d}^3x\, ...
1
vote
2answers
57 views

Toy models of asymptotic safety?

Are there some toy model QFTs where the asymptotic safety scenario is realized?
5
votes
2answers
74 views

What's the difference between energy and temperature in field theory?

I'm familiar with the formalisms for both zero temperature and finite temperature field theory, but (somewhat embarrassingly) I don't actually have a good physical intuition for when physical ...
6
votes
2answers
296 views

(Un)countability in QFT

I am a mathematician self-studying physics, and a currently working on QFT with Srednicki's book. One thing that bothers me is that for a scalar field (in the Hamiltonian version) there is a ...
1
vote
1answer
77 views

Expansion in Quantum Fluctuations of the Path Integral

In this post: Dimensionless Constants in Physics there is a discussion about dimensionful vs. dimensionless constants in physics. In the context of this discussion, I'm wondering about the ...
4
votes
1answer
71 views

The particle content of a given state

In Carroll's we read ...The Unruh effect teaches us the most important lesson of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) in curved spacetime, the idea that "vacuum" and "particles" are observer-dependent ...
2
votes
0answers
70 views

Does anybody know of a source that explains Wick rotation for fermions in 3-dimensional spacetime?

I've been looking for a long time and I've not had a lot of luck. I've found sources that use fermions in 3d Euclidean space but I can't find any that explain the Wick rotation from Minkowski space. ...
0
votes
1answer
43 views

Properties of the Scalar Field in Scalar-Tensor Theories

I've been reading about scalar-tensor theories of gravity, such as Brans-Dicke theory, and I started thinking about the scalar field. Now, I know that the Higgs field is a scalar field, and of course ...
0
votes
0answers
39 views

What are differences between Spin(3,1), SL(2,C), SO(3,1) and SU(2) representations? Which one is correct exact representation for spinor fields? [duplicate]

I want to understand which group transformations exactly represent spinor fields. That is, do spinor fields transform under the Lorentz group $\mathrm{SO}(3,1)$ or under $\mathrm{Spin}(3,1)$? What ...
3
votes
2answers
81 views

What is the axial transformation of a group, i.e. $SU(3)$?

The Gell-Mann matrices $\lambda^\alpha$ are the generators of $SU(3)$. Applying an SU(3) - transformation on the triple $q = ( u , d, s )$ of 4-spinors looks like this: $$ q \rightarrow q' = e^{i ...
1
vote
1answer
67 views

A question about the asymptotic series in perturbative expansion in QFT

Related post I heard about the argument that the perturbative expansion in QFT must be asymptotic, such as http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/perturbation+theory#DivergenceConvergence Roughly this can ...
0
votes
1answer
128 views

Understanding the four fundamental forces of the standard model - are they magic [closed]

Don't misunderstand the question, my purpose is exploration and understanding of what defines "mainstream physics". It is not asked idly, or with ill purpose.... My understanding of current ...
1
vote
1answer
114 views

Lagrangian and grassmann numbers

Why sometimes we remember that "classical" lagrangians of fermions are constructed from grassmann numbers, while sometimes don't? For example, for Majorana's field in terms of 2-component spinors ...
0
votes
0answers
40 views

U(1) local gauge transformation for Dirac spinor field

How can we define U(1) local gauge transformation for Dirac spinor field?, like scalar fields?
1
vote
0answers
33 views

Wick theorem applying to partly ordered operator

I symbolize $T$ as the time-ordered operator and $::$ as normal order symbol. I know that in quantum field theory generally we have: $$T\phi_1(x_1)\dots\phi_n(x_n)=:\phi_1(x_1)\dots\phi_n(x_n):+A$$ ...
1
vote
1answer
74 views

The n-point Green functions and Heisenberg picture

Let's have the S-matrix: $$ S_{\beta \alpha} = \langle \beta | \hat{S} | \alpha\rangle . $$ Here $|\alpha \rangle , | \beta \rangle$ are $t \to \mp \infty$ limit of the free states, $\hat {S} = ...
2
votes
0answers
49 views

Irreducible representation for the massless particle with helicity 2 and the Weyl tensor

As it can be shown, the equations for the irrep with zero mass and helicity 2, -2 respectively can be given in a form $$ \tag 1 \partial^{\dot {b}a}C_{abcd} = 0, \quad ...
2
votes
1answer
130 views

Fermion Self-Interaction

I'm trying to think of a theory with a Fermion self-interaction, similar to the $\phi^4$ theory. The first difficulty is of course that such a theory would have a non-renormalizable mass dimension: ...
1
vote
3answers
324 views

Does the the quantum field theoretic process of particle–antiparticle annihilation break the axioms of Special Relativity?

$\textbf{Note that this diagram hasn't anything to do with the question directly.}$ After a particle and its antiparticle annihilate, their energy is converted into a force carrier particle, such ...
2
votes
0answers
41 views

What's the difference between correlation functions and S-matrix, and between in-in formalism (or “closed time path formalism”) and in-out formalism?

I was reading the "in-in" formalism (or "closed time path formalism" used in condensed matter physics) in cosmology created by Schwinger in 1961, and there is a saying: "they care about correlation ...
0
votes
1answer
70 views

Invariance under charge conjugation… Or not?

I have read some paper which says that the electroweak Lagrangian includes these terms like $\bar{\psi} \gamma_a\gamma_5\psi$ and $\bar{\psi} \gamma_a \psi$. They violate charge conjugation symmetry. ...
2
votes
0answers
78 views

Chiral Anomaly in Massless QED

Classical massless QED has axial current conservation. When quantizing the theory, we expect that suddenly $\partial_\mu \hat{j}^{\mu5}\neq0$ (as an operator equality). I have two questions regarding ...
1
vote
1answer
57 views

Weak interaction violate charge conjugate

How can we show that the weak interaction violates the charge conjugation symmetry?
0
votes
0answers
44 views

Size of an elementary particle [duplicate]

Do we have a well defined mathematical expression denoting the size of a fundamental particle with no internal structure (electron for example) ? If we do, how does it fit in with the uncertainty ...
5
votes
2answers
417 views

How many subatomic particles can absorb/emit photons?

Is the electron the only subatomic particle that can absorb and emit a photon?
3
votes
1answer
50 views

How Chern-Simons gauge field transform fermion to scalar?

In A.Zee's "QFT in a nutshell"book Page 324, after he wrote down the general Lagrangian, he said "in previous chapter, we learned that by introducing a Chern-Simons gauge field we can transform $\psi$ ...
0
votes
0answers
71 views

Antiparticles as “holes” of the quantum fields? [duplicate]

If particles are simply regions of space where certain quantum fields have non-zero divergence, are anti-particles simply the corresponding regions of opposite divergence? This seems like the ...
0
votes
0answers
70 views

Time reversal operator symmetry of dirac lagrangian

I want to prove time reversal symmetry of Dirac Lagrangian, I have some problems with calculations. I start with \begin{eqnarray} T\psi T = U \psi \end{eqnarray} \begin{eqnarray} T\bar{\psi } T = ...
0
votes
0answers
32 views

Interactions with high helicities particles

As it can be shown, there are no interacting helicity-3 (and higher) particles (i.e., massless spin-3 or higher particles) in soft limit (small momentums of emitting particles of given helicity). Сan ...
6
votes
1answer
122 views

Regarding Non-renormalizatibility of GR

I've been doing some reading trying to get to a better understanding of some renormalization issues with the Einstein-Hilbert action. But, something odd came into mind that I'm hoping some users may ...
5
votes
2answers
185 views

S-Matrix Elements in Path Integral Formalism

I have a question related to the connection between the S-Matrix elements and the path integral formalism. In order to formulate the question, I will just work with a scalar field theory for ...
5
votes
0answers
69 views

target category of extended field theory

For a topological field theory to be a true “extension” of an Atiyah-Segal theory, the top two levels of its target (ie its $(n-1)^{\text{st}}$ loop space) must look like $\text{Vect}$. What other ...
1
vote
0answers
46 views

“Dictionnary” between QFTs in D and D-1 dimensions?

Considering Einstein equations, suppose, for instance, that the RHS, the stress-energy tensor, is uniquely due to the electromagnetic field. Now, if we imagine a quantized version of these Einstein ...
10
votes
0answers
150 views

Quantum symmetries that are not classical symmetries

An anomaly is a symmetry of the classical action that fails to be a symmetry of the path integral, due to non-invariance of the path integral measure. Does it ever occur that the opposite thing ...
1
vote
3answers
94 views

Proof of Connected Diagrams

If $Z[J]$ is the generating functional for the path-integral, could any prove (or more reasonably, refer me to a proof) that $$W[J]\equiv\frac{\hbar}{i}\log\left(Z[J]\right)$$ "generates" only ...