Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is the theoretical framework describing the quantisation of classical fields which allows a Lorentz-invariant formulation of quantum mechanics. QFT is used both in high energy physics as well as condensed matter physics and closely related to statistical field theory. Use ...

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

7
votes
4answers
167 views

What role does “spontaneously symmetry breaking” played in the “Higgs Mechanism”?

In talking about Higgs mechanism, the first part is always some introduction to the concept of spontaneously symmetry breaking (SSB), some people saying that Higgs mechanism is the results of SSB of ...
0
votes
0answers
12 views

Need help with Weinberg II (19.5.42)

In "The Quantum Theory of Fields", volume II, p. 202, I can't see how eq. (19.5.42) leads to the following equation. I can maybe see how $$\bar N N= tilde \bar N N$$ but that doesn't go very far... ...
14
votes
8answers
6k views

Is gravity just electromagnetic attraction?

Recently, I was pondering over the thought that is most of the elementary particles have intrinsic magnetism, then can gravity be just a weaker form of electromagnetic attraction? But decided the ...
0
votes
0answers
41 views

QED+Classical Background Renormalization

I would like to ask a question related to quantum corrections and renormalization in QED. We have the QED vertex $\overline{\psi}[-ie \gamma^{\mu}(B_{\mu}+A_{\mu})]\psi,$ being $B_{\mu}$ a classical ...
3
votes
1answer
79 views

Why is a relativistic quantum theory of a finite number of particles impossible?

In Dyson's book Advanced Quantum Mechanics , he said "These two examples (the discovery of antimatter and meson) are special cases of the general principle, which is the basic success of the ...
2
votes
2answers
54 views

What justifies the perturbative expansion in chiral perturbation theory?

The Lagrangian of chiral perturbation theory is ordered following a momenta power counting scheme, having terms at leading order (which is two 2 $O(p^2)$) next to leading order ($O(p^4)$) and so on. ...
4
votes
0answers
68 views

Free probability in Physics

Recently I have started reading some materials on non-commutative probability. IN this area mathematicians sometimes consider quantum theory as a non-commutative version of classical probability, with ...
4
votes
1answer
127 views
+50

Peskin eqn 7.2 contradiction

They state $\langle\Omega|\phi(x)|\lambda_p\rangle=\langle\Omega|e^{iP\cdot x}\phi(0)e^{-iP\cdot x}|\lambda_p\rangle$ where $|\lambda_p\rangle$ is a state of momentum $\textbf{p}$. They then rewrite ...
2
votes
1answer
155 views

Momentum eigenstates in an interacting quantum field theory

Context for the following questions: two widely stated claims hinge on what appears to be an inconsistent argument. The claims are that (1) an interacting field can produce, in addition to ...
0
votes
0answers
14 views

Repulsive potential for free fermions

My question -which is probably easy to answer for a physicist- stems from trying to understand the repulsive interaction between fermions. For instance the fact that states of multifermion systems are ...
4
votes
1answer
74 views

State space of interacting theories

Haag's theorem states that in general, an interacting quantum field and the corresponding free field have unitary-inequivalent state space representations. I would like to have an example of a state ...
13
votes
2answers
2k views

Time ordering and time derivative in path integral formalism and operator formalism

In operator formalism, for example a 2-point time-ordered Green's function is defined as ...
6
votes
1answer
245 views

Casimir Forces and its associated Feynman Propagator

This is a continuation to my previous question, in which I began an attempt solve the Casimir Force problem using path integrals. As one of the answers there suggest I solve the Feynman propagator ...
1
vote
0answers
23 views

Electric field operator in 2D geomatry

In the free field (3D), transverse electric field operator is given by the below expression; $$e^{\bot}(\textbf{R}) =i \sum_{\textbf{p},\lambda}\Big( \frac{\hbar cp}{2V\epsilon_{0}}\Big)^{1/2} ...
7
votes
1answer
87 views

Why is a vertex a derivative of the propagator?

Where can I find the proof to this nice trick: if the momentum $q$ is small, the vertex is the derivative with respect to the mass of a propagator times a factor $(-m/v)$ like in the picture:
2
votes
2answers
107 views

Is there any $SU(\infty)$ gauge theory in quantum field theory?

The groups $U(N)$ and $SU(N)$ are the most important Lie groups in quantum field theory. The most popular are the $U(1),SU(2),SU(3)$ groups (these gauge groups form the Standard model). But is there ...
1
vote
1answer
54 views

Distinction of Dirac monopole and Polyakov-'t Hooft monopole

Can anybody explain the physical difference between Dirac monopole and Polyakov monopole? First, let me write down what I know briefly. Dirac monopole It comes from the symmetry of Maxwell ...
1
vote
0answers
31 views

Baryonic current nonconservation due to electroweak anomalies

Let's have baryonic current: $$ j^{\mu}_{B} = \frac{1}{3}(\bar{u}\gamma^{\mu}u + \bar{d}\gamma^{\mu}d + ...) $$ It can be shown that due to anomaly its conservation is forbidden: $$ \tag 1 ...
1
vote
2answers
198 views

Is entropy a meaningful concept on a quantum level?

My naive assumptions, as I really am at a pretty basic stage in QM, are as follows: Classically, entropy gives us a practical measure of the direction of time, as opposed to our physical laws which, ...
0
votes
0answers
38 views

Can I Wick-contract terms with derivatives with terms without derivatives?

Consider for example the QCD three point vertex, can I contract a gluon field with the gluon field with a derivative in the vertex?
4
votes
1answer
258 views

Does tunneling transmission probability depend on the density of states or velocity?

In some quantum text books [1], the tunneling transmission formula depends only on the density of states of 2 regions (DOS) involved in tunneling. ($T(E) = C \times DOS_1(E) \times DOS_2(E)$, where C ...
3
votes
1answer
199 views

effective field theory of the projective semion model

The "projective semion" model was considered in http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.6491 (page 2). It is a symmetry enriched topological (SET) phase. There is one non-trivial anyon, a semion $s$ which induces a ...
-2
votes
0answers
24 views

time as consequence of hadronics [on hold]

it has occurred to me that time is solely consequence of non-electric fields, with latest work being reading about «anapole» cite: Simple theory may explain dark matter due to ...
0
votes
1answer
39 views

Are the particle-antiparticle pairs produced in vacuum virtual particles, and can they interact with normal particles?

If it is true that due to energy fluctuations of a vacuum being able to produce a particle-antiparticle pair that shortly annihilate with each other and disappear again, is the following circumstance ...
5
votes
1answer
151 views

Phase Transition at Zero Temperature (Not QPT)

As is well known the Ising model exhibits a phase transition, except the one dimensional case in which the phase transition occurs strictly at $T=0$. Now I have always thought that this makes the case ...
7
votes
1answer
341 views

Eikonal approximation in QFT

Does the eikonal approximation for calculating a scattering amplitude in QFT provide the exact result in the limit of $s\rightarrow\infty$ at finite $t=0$ ($s$ and $t$ are the usual Mandelstam ...
0
votes
0answers
63 views

Klein-Gordon Field Angular Momentum Operator in Terms of Creation and Annihilation Operators

I am computing the angular momentum operator for real Klein-Gordon field (essentially question six of here (though please note this is not a homework question, I am following through Tong's course via ...
0
votes
0answers
17 views

If we considered chiral perturbation theory with coplex $\phi$-s, wold the next lo leading order renormalization $\gamma$-s change?

The Lagrangian of chiral perturbation theory (with two quark flavors) is written using the following matrix $U$ $$U=e^{i\sigma^i\phi_i/f}$$ where $\sigma^i$ are the Pauli matrices, $\phi_i$ are three ...
5
votes
0answers
127 views
+50

Why are the quantum observables defined on opens sets a presheaf and not a sheaf?

In local quantum field theory or AQFT one can mathematically describe over each open set $U$ of a spacetime $M$ the quantum states or observables of the theory. This structure is commonly referred as ...
1
vote
0answers
26 views

Covariant projection method - Meson bound states

I have seen many papers that discuss the production or decay of mesons ( quark bound states ) to make use of the covariant projection method where the product $\upsilon\bar{u}$ of the quark spinors ...
1
vote
1answer
49 views

A question to gauge fixing in nonabelian gauge theories

In quantum gauge theories it is usual to fix the gauge with the equation $\partial^\mu A_\mu = 0$ where $A_\mu$ is the gauge connection. From this gauge fixing condition the remaining gauge degree of ...
2
votes
2answers
61 views

Compact QED and Non-compact QED - Polyakov textbook

This question is related with Polyakov, "Gauge Fields and Strings" section 4.3 Firstly, Polyakov define a QED on a lattice Compact QED \begin{align} S = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{x, \alpha, \beta} ...
-6
votes
0answers
37 views

how could the sun photons be the source of light to our vision? [on hold]

if the atom has 99.99% empty space and the photon has no mass while our universe is 2dimensional flat so how could the sun photons be the source of our vision? how could photons be reflected by ...
7
votes
2answers
307 views

Peskin's book page 334 proof of $Z_1=Z_2$ to all orders in QED perturbation theory

Peskin in his QFT page 334 argued that $Z_1=Z_2$ to all orders in QED perturbation theory, but I couldn't understand his argument: ... With a generalization of the argument given there (section ...
4
votes
1answer
197 views

Can the Higgs condensate be described in terms of creation operators?

In superconductivity, the BCS condensate can be described in terms of 2 creation operators (the 2 electrons of the pair) acting on the vacuum. I'm wondering whether a similar description can be given ...
1
vote
1answer
120 views

Can you express the Feynman propagator as a limit?

At first I thought that the Feynman propagator was the limit of: $$ G(x) = \frac{1}{x^2 + i \varepsilon} $$ But if you apply the wave equation to this you get: $$ \Box G(x) = ...
1
vote
1answer
36 views

Do contractions with Dirac matrices involve a metric?

When figuring out where the spacetime metric enters an equation it is often useful to write all vector indices as covariant indices and write out the inverse metrics that are needed to contract them, ...
1
vote
0answers
51 views

Negative interaction energies for relativistic bound states

I guess that bound states are treated as poles with infinite lifetime, i.e. precise determination for energy eigenvalues. But what's left with negative interaction energies, which are connected to ...
4
votes
1answer
92 views

Strange use of complex analysis in Weinberg QFT 1?

In the beginning of chapter 3 on scattering theory in Weinberg's QFT book there is a use of the Cauchy residual theorem that I just cannot get. First some notation, we are looking at states that are ...
2
votes
0answers
37 views

Textbooks for nonequilibrium quantum field theory

What are good textbooks for nonequilibrium quantum field theory? Please answer by naming quality books and a short description and review about each one that you have personally read or benefited ...
7
votes
1answer
2k views

Schrodinger equation from Klein-Gordon?

One can view QM as a 1+0 dimensional QFT, fields are only depending on time and so are only called operators, and I know a way to derive Schrodinger's equation from Klein-Gordon's one. Assuming a ...
3
votes
2answers
177 views

Weinberg QFT (2.5.5)

I'm slightly confused about something in volume 1 of Weinberg. He says $U(\Lambda)\Psi_{p,\sigma}=\sum_{\sigma'}C_{\sigma'\sigma}(\Lambda,p)\Psi_{\Lambda p,\sigma'}$. Then, "In general, it may be ...
3
votes
1answer
94 views

Is the Dirac equation equivalent to the Klein-Gordon equation for its left handed component?

The Dirac equation $$(i\gamma^a\partial_a - m)\psi=0\tag{0}$$ is given by a first order operator acting on a Dirac spinor, which is the direct sum of a left handed spinor and a right handed spinor. ...
4
votes
0answers
120 views

Has Sen quantized superstring fields?

Today I saw a paper by Ashoke Sen titled "BV Master Action for Heterotic and Type II String Field Theories". Is it really the "quantization" of superstring fields for the first time? What can be its ...
0
votes
0answers
42 views

correlation functions [closed]

What is the physical meaning of following correlation functions in one-dimensional correlated electron systems: 1. density-density correlation function, 2. spin-spin correlation function, 3. ...
1
vote
0answers
41 views

How can the stress tensor components of a worldsheet CFT in general background be (anti)-holomorphic?

In all textbooks/lecture notes on string theory (e.g. Polchinski, page 43 at the bottom) it is proven that, as the stress tensor is traceless and conserved, $T^a_a=\partial^a T_{ab}=0$, we have ...
7
votes
5answers
757 views

Physical Interpretation of the Integrand of the Feynman Path Integral

In quantum mechanics, we think of the Feynman Path Integral $\int{D[x] e^{\frac{i}{\hbar}S}}$ (where $S$ is the classical action) as a probability amplitude (propagator) for getting from $x_1$ to ...
13
votes
1answer
724 views

The divergence in QCD Series— How many are they, and what do they mean?

I am referring to this question, and especially this answer. In addition, QCD has - like all field theories - only an asymptotic perturbation series, which means that the series itself will ...
-3
votes
0answers
57 views

Singularity in the context of the Quantum mechanics [closed]

In the TV program , Professor Michio Kaku had told that singularity can be defined as the rotation of the neutron . I'm searching whether the insist was right or wrong . How does the quantum mechanics ...
0
votes
1answer
144 views

Field transformations

I'm reading Maggiore's book "A modern introduction to quantum field theory" and I'm very confused by what he did in chapter 2.6 page 31 eq. (2.80). He basically wants to find the generators of the ...