In physics, an operator is almost always either a square matrix or a linear mapping from one space of functions (often on $\mathbb{R}^N$ or $\mathbb{C}^N$) to the same or other like space of functions. Operators serve as *observables* and as *time evolution operators* in Quantum Mechanics. This tag ...

learn more… | top users | synonyms

-1
votes
1answer
46 views

Orbital angular momentum eigenstates in the $|\mathbf{r}\rangle$ representation

Consider the orbital angular momentum operators $L^2$ and $L_z$. In the $|\mathbf{r}\rangle$ representation using spherical coordinates those operators actions are given by ...
5
votes
1answer
82 views

Can I *always* decompose a normalizable function into the discrete Hydrogen spectrum?

This question has been bothering me for a while now: can one reconstruct an arbitrary (normalizable) function $\phi(\mathbf r)$ in $\mathbb R^3$, with only the discrete set of Hydrogen wavefunctions ...
1
vote
3answers
169 views

Momentum operator representation

If $\hat{p}$ acts on position eigenstate, it is $$\tag{1}\hat{p}\left|x\right\rangle=+i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left|x\right\rangle .$$ But in general $$\tag{2}\hat{p} = -i\hbar ...
2
votes
1answer
77 views

Proof that trace is independent of representation [closed]

$$\begin{align} \sum_{a'} \langle a'|X|a'\rangle &=\sum_{a',b',b''} \langle a'|b'\rangle \langle b'|X|b''\rangle\langle b''|a'\rangle \\ &=\sum_{b',b''} \langle b''|b'\rangle \langle ...
3
votes
2answers
173 views

Confusion with Weinberg's QFT book, volume 1, chapter 3: time translation and Heisenberg picture

Sorry if this is a naive question, but I am new to QFT. In the treatment of scattering in section 3.1 of The quantum theory of fields, vol.1, Weinberg first presented the general transformation rule ...
1
vote
0answers
48 views

Proof that a Hermitian Matrix is not defective?

I am taking an introductory course into Quantum Mechanics. To me to seems pretty simple to prove most properties of Hermitian operators. However, I am stuck at an edge case, proving that if an ...
1
vote
0answers
62 views

QFT: Ground State Momentum - Normalisation of States

In my notes I have, $$ \left\langle \mathbf{p} \left| \mathbf{q} \right.\right\rangle = \left\langle 0 \left| {a(\mathbf{p})}\ {a(\mathbf{q})}^{\dagger} \right| 0 \right\rangle $$ I am not sure how ...
2
votes
1answer
86 views

Conservation of momentum in infinite square well

This is inspired by Griffiths QM section 2.2, on the infinite square well, which is about how far I've gotten (so, sorry if this is addressed later in the book). For any given starting wavefunction, ...
5
votes
1answer
288 views

Wick's theorem for calculating OPE

I am trying to understand a calculation using Wick's theorem. Let $T(z)$ be the analytic part of a stress-energy tensor, and $\phi(z)$ a free boson field. Now, ...
0
votes
1answer
95 views

Galilean relativity in QM

Intro I've been trying to show that the generator of boosts can be written in operator form as can be seen here, as: $$ B = \sum_i m_i x_i(t) - t \sum_i p_i $$ As a reminder the transformation ...
4
votes
0answers
55 views

Commutation of two vector operator [closed]

Consider vectors $\overrightarrow { A } $ and $\overrightarrow { B } $ as operators or vector of operators. If this commutation holds$$[\overrightarrow { A },\overrightarrow { B }]=0$$ Then, is that ...
1
vote
1answer
127 views

Kronecker sum or direct sum?

When we write $$H=\sum_k H_k$$ in condensed matter physics, are we using Kronecker sum or direct sum? I think this is direct sum. However, Wikipedia says it is Kronecker sum. Can anyone give some ...
1
vote
2answers
92 views

Manipulation of operators in quantum mechanics

I'm reading some notes on quantum mechanics that state the following. $$\langle x\rvert \left( \hat{x} + \frac{i\hat{p}}{m\omega}\right) \lvert E \rangle = 0 \Rightarrow \left( x+ ...
2
votes
2answers
59 views

Why do $\hat{X}$ and $\hat{P}$ have to correspond to position and momentum?

As far as I understand, in QM we treat observables as operators, and the eigenvalues of these operators are the possible values we can measure of the observables. It is usually simpler to work in the ...
4
votes
1answer
67 views

Why aren't $\hat{x}$ and $\hat{p}$ considered functions of time in the expectation value?

In Griffiths Intro to QM (2nd edition), he gives the equation $$ \frac{d}{dt} \langle Q \rangle = \frac{i}{\hbar}\langle [\hat{H},\hat{Q}] \rangle + \left\langle ...
1
vote
2answers
539 views

Binomial expansion of non-commutative operators

I would like to determine the general expansion of $$(A+B)^n,$$ where $[A,B]\neq0$, i.e. $A$ and $B$ are two generally non-commutative operators. How could I express this in terms of summations of ...
0
votes
0answers
21 views

Why should an generator acts on an operator with the Lie bracket?

When we deal with ordinary symmetries which form a Lie group, we have an corresponding Lie algebra with a structure of Lie bracket $[,]$. A infinitesimal transformation can act on a state or an ...
4
votes
2answers
111 views

Radial quantum number for infinite circular well

For completeness, I will sketch the solution of a particle in an infinite circular well first and then get to my question. I apologize in advance since the introduction is standard undergraduate ...
10
votes
2answers
431 views

Is there any theorem that suggests that QM+SR has to be an operator theory?

UPDATE To make my question more precise, I'll define what I mean by an operator theory: An operator theory is a theory in which the dynamical objects are operators, i.e., the equations of motion ...
1
vote
1answer
158 views

Proof for Negele and Orland equation (2.34)

The equation (2.34) of Negele and Orland has $$\mathcal H_\text{A}(\hat{\mathbf p},\hat{\mathbf x}) = \frac{1}{2m}\left(\hat {\mathbf p} - \frac e c \mathbf A(\hat{\mathbf x})\right)^2.\tag{2.34a}$$ ...
6
votes
2answers
242 views

What is the connection between Hilbert Space and path integrals?

Given a space of states $|\rangle$, $|x\rangle$, $|x,y\rangle$, with the creation operators such as $\hat{\phi}(x)|y,z\rangle=|x,y,z\rangle$ for creating a particle at position $x$ and so on. How ...
3
votes
0answers
75 views

Vector operators in quantum mechanics

Vector operators $\vec{V}$ in quantum mechanics are usually defined as those that commute in a particular way with the spatial Angular Momentum $\vec{L}$: $[L_i,V_j]=i\hbar\varepsilon_{ijk}V_k$. I am ...
3
votes
2answers
302 views

$\hat{L}_{x}$ and $\hat{L}_{y}$ do not commute… or do they?

So $\hat{L}_{x}$ and $\hat{L}_{y}$ do not commute: $$ [ \hat{L}_{x}, \hat{L}_{y}] = i\hbar \hat{L}_{z}$$ But, what if we perform this operation on a state such that: $$\hat{L}_{z} \phi_{l, m_{l}} ...
3
votes
1answer
143 views

In nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics, is the expectation value of a sum of operators always equal to the sum of the expectation values?

Suppose that $\lvert \psi_n \rangle$ are the eigenvectors of a Hamiltonian, $\hat{H}$, which span some Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ and satisfy $$\hat{H}\lvert \psi_n \rangle = E_n \lvert \psi_n ...
0
votes
1answer
47 views

Lorentz covariant completeness relation

Let be $$ P^\mu |p> = p^\mu |p> $$ i.e. $|p>$ is the eigen-vector of the 4-momentum operator. Where does the following Lorentz-covariant completeness relation come from? $$ \int d^4p ...
7
votes
4answers
2k views

Why is normal ordering a valid operation?

Why is normal ordering even a valid operation in the first place? I mean it can give us some nice results, but why can we do the ordering for the operators like that? Is its definition motivated by ...
1
vote
1answer
45 views

Why is the angular momentum added for two independent electron system? (no problem)

There is no problem now. But somebody may be confused by the same analysis when studying QM or Group theory. (actually my motivation for asking this question comes from the SU(5) Grand Unification ...
1
vote
0answers
38 views

Determine adjoint operator [closed]

I need to determine the adjoint operator to $a_i$: $a_i |n_0, n_1, ... \rangle_S = \sqrt{n_i} |n_0, n_1, ..., n_{i-1}, n_i - 1, n_{i+1}, .. \rangle_S$ where the $S$ should denote the symmetrizer. I ...
0
votes
0answers
28 views

Matrix representation of a fermionic creation and annihilation operator in graphene nanoribbons?

From the other question Matrix representation for fermionic annihilation operator, what if we have to find the matrix representation for the operators $a_{\sigma}^{\dagger}(k,n)$ and $b_{\sigma}(k,n)$ ...
0
votes
1answer
35 views

Heisenberg picture transition amplitudes

I want to calculate the transition amplitude for a particle to start at position $q_1$ at time $t_1$ to position $q_2$ at time $t_2$ in the Heisenberg picture. As we are in the Heisenberg picture, ...
3
votes
0answers
28 views

Baryonic operators in ${\cal N}=1$ $U(N)$ SQCD in four dimensions

Seiberg's duality is usually considered as a duality for $SU(N_c)$ theories with $N_f$ flavors. In his case, the vacuum for $N_f \geq N_c$ is parameterized by mesons $M$ and baryons ${\bar B}$ and ...
1
vote
2answers
72 views

Negative powers of operators

This may sound like a strange question, but just to be sure: Suppose I have a general Hermitian operator in Hilbert space whose action on an eigenvector is given by $R|r\rangle = r|r\rangle$. Then, I ...
10
votes
2answers
460 views

Eigenstate of field operator in QFT

Why don't people discuss the eigenstate of the field operator? For example, the real scalar field the field operator is Hermitian, so its eigenstate is an observable quantity.
6
votes
1answer
226 views

Equation 2.27 from Pachos's introduction to topological quantum computing

http://quince.leeds.ac.uk/~phyjkp/Files/IntroTQC.pdf above is the PDF that is hosted on his website. The equation is on page 22 (pg 30 in the pdf). In chapter 2. It is the second equation of the ...
-2
votes
1answer
60 views

Limit of the position and momentum commutator [closed]

The commutator of position and momentum operator, $\hat{p}$ and $\hat{x}$, respectively is derived as $[\hat{x},\hat{p}]=i\hbar$. Let $\lim_{x\rightarrow x_{o}} [\hat{x},\hat{p}]=\lim_{x\rightarrow ...
2
votes
3answers
2k views

Commutators involving functions

I am looking for the commutator: $$[e^{aq},p]$$ My approach is to Taylor expand the function: $$[\sum_n \frac{1}{n!}(aq)^n,p]$$ I know that $[q^n,p]=ni\hbar q^{n-1}$ So how do I account for $n$ ...
3
votes
1answer
128 views

Is the energy always discrete?

In the von Neumann axioms for quantum mechanics, the first postulate states that a quantum state is a vector in a separable Hilbert space. It means it is assumed the Hilbert space has a basis with at ...
0
votes
0answers
47 views

Spin-1/2 rotation operator: rotation about an angle of $\pi$

The spin-1/2 rotation operator: $$ R_{n}(\alpha) = \begin{pmatrix} cos(\frac{\alpha}{2})-in_{z}sin(\frac{\alpha}{2}) & (-in_{x}-n_{y})sin(\frac{\alpha}{2}) \\ ...
1
vote
1answer
119 views

Time-ordered product vs path integral

Suppose we have the Green function $$ G(k) \equiv \tag 1\int d^4x e^{ikx}\langle 0| T\left(\partial^{x}_{\mu}A^{\mu}(x)B(0)\right)|0\rangle , $$ which in path integral approach is equal to $$ \tag 2 ...
0
votes
1answer
56 views

Spectrum of Laplacian on one hemisphere

as is well-known, the spectrum of the Laplace operator on $S^2$, computed via $-\Delta f=\lambda f$, is positive and discrete. What happens to the spectrum if we just take one hemisphere into ...
0
votes
0answers
37 views

Lorentz invariance of matrix element of Heisenberg operator

The following text is taken by Weinberg book of QFT Volume 1, pg.437 Let's consider $O_l(x)$ an Heinsenberg-picture operator with the Lorentz transformation properties of some sort of free field ...
0
votes
0answers
32 views

Can we create ladder operators for any potential? [duplicate]

I understand the mechanism for the harmonic oscillator, so can we generalize the ladder operator in order to work for any 1-D symmetric potential such as Gaussian potential well?
1
vote
2answers
137 views

Are the eigenstates of an operator time independent?

In the Schrodinger picture, are the eigenstates of an operator time independent? Is it their expectation values that evolve in time rather than the actual eigenstates? For example, say I have an ...
8
votes
5answers
354 views

Why does the measurement of some observable $A$, the measured value is always an eigenvalue of the operator?

Explain why when we make a measurement of some observable $A$ in QM, the measured value is always an eigenvalue of the operator $A$.
1
vote
3answers
114 views

Prove time-dependent hamiltonian is hermitian from unitarity of time-evolution operator

When we solve the Schrodinger equation for the time-evolution operator: \begin{equation} i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}U(t,t_{0})=HU(t,t_{0}), \end{equation} We have three cases to be treated ...
10
votes
1answer
8k views

Evolution operator for time-dependent Hamiltonian

When I studied QM I'm only working with time independent Hamiltonians. In this case the unitary evolution operator has the form $$\hat{U}=e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Ht}$$ that follows from this equation $$ ...
0
votes
0answers
41 views

The commutator between observable and unit radius vector

As I encounter the commutator relating to unit radius vector, I am quite confused. I have just started the learning of quantum mechanics and all I know about the commutator is based on two identities: ...
3
votes
0answers
47 views

commutation relations in terms of eigenstates scalar product

This question has caught my attention because I was unaware of the fact that the position-momentum canonical commutation relations could be derived out of the only assumption for $\langle x | ...
0
votes
1answer
83 views

Confusion with time ordering

I am thinking about Proof of correlation function formula in quantum field theory and have realized there is a deeper confusion underpinning that. Consider: $$T\{U_I(T, t_2)\Phi_I(x_1)\}$$ where ...
3
votes
0answers
100 views

Why Use the Non-Relativistic Momentum Operator in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?

In deriving the Klein Gordon equation one starts out with the relativistic energy relation E^2 = p^2 + m^2 and substitutes the quantum momentum operator that corresponds to non-relativistic QM, p = -i ...