The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

2
votes
1answer
46 views

Dirac Notation Question Appearing In a Projection

So I have a part of the energy eigenvalue equation that look like this: $$ \delta(\hat{x})|n\rangle $$ Where n is the energy basis of the Hamiltonian I'm considering. To deal with this, I tried ...
2
votes
1answer
132 views

Reaction coordinate as a function of atomic positions

I'm going over some (molecular dynamics) related literature - specifically the derivation of the Weighted Histogram Analysis Method (WHAM). As a quick backdrop WHAM is a method for stitching ...
5
votes
0answers
112 views

Is it correct to sum over either index of the metric the same way?

I don't know if the following is correct, i want to compute the following derivative $$\frac{\partial }{\partial (\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu})}\left(\partial^{\alpha}A^{\beta}\partial_{\alpha}A_{\beta} ...
3
votes
0answers
106 views

Convention in physics for [],{} and operators (QM)

I got a little mixed up with the convention in physics. Usually a hat means an operator. For a given electron-ion Hamiltonian $\hat{H}_{e-n}$, what are the difference between these: 1) ...
3
votes
0answers
89 views

What decides the signs and coefficients of terms in superfield?

I'm working on a problem in 3d field theory and I'm confused about how to write the superfields. Specifically, I'm not sure if the signs and coefficients of terms are purely a matter of convention or ...
3
votes
0answers
144 views

Group theory notation used in physics (AdS/CFT)

This in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence. I am reading this review on AdS/CFT Aharony et. al. (The MAGOO review) The abstract can be found here Equation (2.50) of the above paper lists the ...
2
votes
0answers
103 views

Topological quantum computation : Anyon model

Could someone tell me about Frobenius-Schur indicator and the associated cups and caps notation in context of anyon model. One possible reference could be Parsa Bonderson thesis which is freely ...
1
vote
0answers
42 views

The states of the adjoint representation correspond to the generators

I understand the definition of the adjoint representation. It uses structure constants as matrix components of generators, but I can't understand meaning of the states $|X_{a}\rangle$. What does ...
1
vote
0answers
58 views

Index Notation Double Curl

My question is about Einstein notation. It does not matter the specifics of this example (the del operator could be another random vector), I just want to know if my assumption about notation is ...
1
vote
0answers
39 views

Are derivative indices summed in indicial notation?

A paper I'm reading uses indicial notation and the convention that $u_{j,k}$ means the derivative with respect to $x_k$. Which one of these interpretations are correct? $$A_{ijk}u_{j,k} = ...
1
vote
0answers
189 views

Field Strength Renormalisation in Peskin and Schroeder

In chapter 7 of Peskin and Schroeder they define the field strength renormalisation $Z$ for a quantum field to be the residue of the Fourier transform of the correlation function $$\langle \Omega | ...
0
votes
0answers
48 views

Tricks at manipulating creation/annihilation operators

Manipulation of terms in algebras different from the standard one (e.g. boolean algebra) can be a bit unnatural but there are always shortcuts that can help you. I was wondering if there is a list ...
0
votes
0answers
69 views

How should the implicit sum $C_{ijkl}u_{i,j}u_{k,l}$ be interpreted?

$C$ is a 3x3x3x3 tensor. How should the expression $C_{ijkl}u_{i,j}u_{k,l}$ be interpreted? This is my guess: $$ \sum_{i=1}^3\sum_{j=1}^3 \sum_{k=1}^3\sum_{l=1}^3 C_{ijkl}u_{i,j}u_{k,l} $$
0
votes
0answers
40 views

Russell-Saunders Term

The Russell-Saunders term states that: $$^{2S+1}L_{J}$$ Now, if I'm not mistaken, $L$ is the total orbital angular momentum, $J = L + S$, but what is $S$ exactly? I know it's the total spin angular ...
0
votes
0answers
146 views

Quantum Mutual Information scaling

Wikipedia provides a simple definition of Quantum Mutual Information: $$I(\rho^{ab})= S(\rho^{a}) + S(\rho^{b}) - S(\rho^{ab})$$ where in terms of relative information we have: $$I(\rho^{ab})= ...