Majorana fermions are the particles associated to the real representation (hence the real solution) of the Dirac equation, as established by the Italian physicist Ettore Majorana in the late 30's. By extension, a Majorana fermion will be any particle (emergent or fundamental) having the property to ...

learn more… | top users | synonyms

1
vote
0answers
51 views

Anomaly for Majorana fermion?

In 4-spacetime dimension, is there U(1) gauge field chiral anomaly associated with Majorana fermion (or I am not sure if it is equivalent, majorana representation)? Besides, I have read from several ...
2
votes
0answers
23 views

How to calculate the ground states' Berry phases with doubly degeneracy, such as that due to the particle-hole symmetry or time reversal symmetry?

Suppose the ground states of a system are doubly degenerate due to an anti-unitary symmetry $K$, which are $|\psi>$ and $|K\psi>$. If the system is an one-dimensional Fermion system and ...
2
votes
2answers
125 views

What makes a superconductor topological?

I have read a fair bit about topological insulators and proximity induced Majorana bound states when placing a superconductor in proximity to a topological insulator. I've also read a bit about ...
1
vote
1answer
53 views

What are the quantum numbers of Majorana neutrinos?

I have a question about majorana neutrinos. Majorana particles are particles that are their own antiparticle. From this I would argue that they need to have all quantum numbers equal to zero. My ...
0
votes
1answer
48 views

Neutrino mass and the Majorana equation

I can't seem find this on the Internet. What does the Majorana equation predict neutrino masses to be (if they were their own antiparticle), and how? (I have little understanding of spinors, btw...) ...
1
vote
0answers
33 views

What is the number of fermions in Kitaev honeycomb model?

One way to solve the Kitaev honeycomb model: $$ H = J_x \sum_{\textrm{x links}, <ij> } \sigma^x_i \sigma^x_j + J_y \sum_{\textrm{y links}, <ij> } \sigma^y_i \sigma^y_j + J_z ...
2
votes
0answers
58 views

How are topological invariants constructed?

I've seen several different definitions for what are called topological invariants, for instance in the context of Majorana unpaired modes, by Kitaev: http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0010440 ...
3
votes
2answers
81 views

Can one define wavefunction for Bogoliubov quasiparticle excitation in a superconductor?

Wavefunction is essentially a single particle concept. It is easily extended to multiparticle system as follows- if one has say five electrons the wavefunction of this five electron state is any ...
4
votes
0answers
70 views

Axiom approach for majorana fermions

This is the usual way of introducing majorana operators. First we have $N$ fermionic modes. The corresponding operators satisfy the commutation relations $$ \{c_i, c_j \}= \{c_i^\dagger, c_j^\dagger ...
4
votes
1answer
134 views

braiding bosons or fermions around majorana fermion

Majorana fermions are described by their topological charge. My question is whether we can see the topological charge of Majorana fermions by braiding a boson or a fermion around it ? Is the only ...
2
votes
0answers
114 views

Majorana zero mode and 1D Ising model

It is known that the one-dimensional (1D) Ising model can be mapped to a free Majorana model using a Jordan-Wigner transformation and its two degenerated ground states are well interpreted by the two ...
0
votes
1answer
46 views

Why are Majorana fields usually used to introduce gravity in the Rarita-Schwinger Lagrangian?

When first introducing the gravitational interaction for a spin-3/2 Rarita-Schwinger field, Majorana fields are usually used (see for example here at chapter 4, or in Ramond, (6.4.112) ). Why is ...
3
votes
1answer
97 views

Why Majorana phases cannot be removed?

Why is the extra two Majorana phases in the PMNS matrix cannot be removed if neutrinos are Majorana fermions? Or in other words, why are the Majorana phases cannot be absorbed into the redefinition of ...
6
votes
3answers
226 views

Why aren't purely Dirac neutrinos ruled out?

It is common knowledge that in neutrinos can be Dirac particles without any Majorana masses as given a mass matrix, \begin{equation} \left( \begin{array}{cc}\nu _L & \nu _R \end{array} \right) ...
2
votes
0answers
98 views

Pedagogical introduction to vertex, domain wall, and kink

Recently, Majorana fermion becomes hot in condensed matter physics. The concepts: vertex, domain wall, and kink often appear in these articles about Majorana fermion. I have no idea about the ...
2
votes
0answers
38 views

Fractional Josephson effect explained

I am confused by the fractional Josephson effect. I still don't know if there has to be parity conservation or not. Is the fractional Josepshon effect always connected to fermion parity anomaly ...
0
votes
0answers
58 views

Equivalence of derivation of Majorana fermions

Perhaps is this a stupid question but I have really no answer. To prove the emergence of Majorana bound states I search zero-energy solution of the Bogoliubov - de Gennes equation $$ ...
3
votes
2answers
121 views

Why do the $1/2$ factor appear in the Majorana mass Lagrangian?

In case of Dirac neutrino there is no $1/2$ factor in the mass Lagrangian but for Majorana type neutrino there is a half factor in the mass Lagrangian.
2
votes
1answer
77 views

Seesaw type-1 and integrating out heavy fields

Let's assume seesaw 1 type of generation of left neutrino Majorana mass: $$ L_{m} = -G_{ij}\begin{pmatrix} \bar{\nu}_{L}& \bar{l}_{L}\end{pmatrix}^{i}i\sigma_{2}\begin{pmatrix}\varphi_{1}^{*} \\ ...
4
votes
1answer
75 views

How to cancel infinite mass corrections for quantities without counterterms?

I'm trying to understand how infinite mass corrections are cancelled for a particle that is massless at tree level. In short the problem is that we have infinite diagrams, but we don't have a ...
6
votes
2answers
107 views

Double decay $\beta\beta$ observation and neutrino mass

If the double decay $\beta\beta$ will be detected this means the neutrino is a Majorana particle coincident with its antiparticle. At the moment the half life of this decay is put to ...
2
votes
1answer
69 views

Majorana Superfields

so apologies if this is a silly question... In the type 1 see saw model we add extra Majorana fermions to our model. These fermions have to be total gauge singlets in order to have a Majorana mass ...
5
votes
0answers
85 views

Is $\overline{\psi_{L}^{c}}\psi_{R}^{c}=\overline{\psi_{R}}\psi_{L}$ true for two different spin 1/2 fermions?

In the context of seesaw mechanism or Dirac and Majorana mass terms, one often see the following identity $$ \overline{\psi_{L}^{c}}\psi_{R}^{c}=\overline{\psi_{R}}\psi_{L}. $$ Here, I am using 4 ...
2
votes
1answer
77 views

Mass scales in See-saw mechenism

Are both types of Majorana masses $$\mathcal{L}^L_M=-\frac{m_L}{2}[\overline{(\psi_L)^c}\psi_L + \overline{\psi_L}(\psi_L)^c]$$ and $$\mathcal{L}^R_M=-\frac{m_R}{2}[\overline{(\psi_R)^c}\psi_R + ...
4
votes
3answers
264 views

Majorana Mass For Neutrinos In Standard Model

Neutrinos can't be given Dirac masses because there is no $SU(2)_L$ singlet right handed neutrinos in the standard model. But can neutrinos be given Majorana masses in the standard model? EDIT: Why ...
1
vote
0answers
89 views

Oscillations and Majorana Neutrino

In neutrino oscillations, neutrinos can convert from one flavor to another. This implies individual lepton number is not conserved. Doesn't it also imply that, if the neutrinos have mass, the mass ...
2
votes
0answers
192 views

Why is there a Majorana zero mode in the $\pi$ flux core of the p+ip superconductor?

In this review paper (http://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.1293.pdf), the author shows that threading a $\pi$ flux through a 2D $p_x+ip_y$ superconductor will trap a Majorana zero mode at the flux center. The ...
0
votes
1answer
77 views

Problem evaluating $C^{-1}M^\dagger C$

How can I show the following? $$\overline{\psi_L}M^\dagger (\psi_L)^c=\overline{\psi_L}CM^\dagger\overline{\psi_L}^T$$ where $\psi^c=C\overline{\psi}^T$ and ...
5
votes
1answer
1k views

Majorana mass vs Dirac Mass

Why is it said that the Dirac mass term conserves the fermion number but the Majorana mass term does not? Can someone explain this mathematically? Which breakdown of symmetry is responsible for ...
2
votes
1answer
326 views

Majorana equation in two forms

Let's have two forms of Majorana equation. First form (standart or spinor representations of gamma-matrices). $$ i\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu}\Psi - m\Psi = 0, \quad \Psi = \Psi_{c} = \hat {C} \bar ...
2
votes
1answer
61 views

Non-vanishing commutator of potential and mass matrices for Majorana fermions interaction theory

Consider 2 different Majorana fermions $\Psi_{L}, \Psi_{R}$ (physically, neutrinos). In general case I can write the massive part of lagrangian of these fermions in the form $$ L_{m} = (\bar ...
1
vote
0answers
92 views

Josephson effect - fractional or not

It is well known that a current proportional to $J\propto\sin(\phi_1-\phi_2)$ flows when two superconductor with phases $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ are connected. Also, a current which depends on the ...
5
votes
1answer
281 views

Topology and Majorana bound states

I'm working at the moment on Majorana Bound states and their topological properties. Now I have a question about it. The Altland-Zirnbauer symmetry classes says us how many topological different ...
2
votes
0answers
95 views

Majorana equation and non-invariance of spinor representation under discrete Lorentz transformations

Here I asked about getting an equation for two-component spinor as the alternative for Dirac equation. It was found that it is called Majorana equation. It may be easily derived by using historical ...
1
vote
1answer
345 views

Determining spectra of edge states numerically

Normally we write a Bloch Hamiltonian $H(\mathbf{k})$ for the bulk and determine the spectrum which gives us various bands i.e we basically obtain $E=E(\mathbf{k})$ for the bulk only. Also in the ...
5
votes
1answer
129 views

What sorts of complications do massive neutrinos bring to the Standard Model?

Naively, I'd just think of considering them as any other massive fermions (but without electric charge), including the appropriate chiralities (and neutrino-higgs coupling when necessary). ...
8
votes
1answer
345 views

Question about Majorana fermions

I have a few questions about Majorana fermions. What is Majorana mass? Does it have a different value compared to the mass in the Dirac equation for an arbitrary fermion? How exactly do they differ? ...
3
votes
1answer
177 views

Vortices and chemical potential in topological superconductors

I am trying to read up some review articles about Majorana physics in topological material, but I am not really familiar with the condensed matter terminology (with condensed matter in general I ...
3
votes
1answer
253 views

Majorana wavefunction

I'm trying to compute the wavefunction for a Majorana state in an nanowire/superconductor hybrid system, like arXiv: Majorana Fermions and a Topological Phase Transition in ...
3
votes
1answer
430 views

Parity of the ground state of a Majorana chain

I work on the Kitaev toy model for Majorana fermions. He writes that in Majorana basis the Hamiltonian becomes in general $$ H = \frac{i}{4} \sum_{l,m} A_{l,m}\gamma_{l}\gamma_{m} $$ where $\gamma$ ...
3
votes
0answers
413 views

Definition of 'Majorana Number' in the Kitaev Chain

I have some questions about the Kitaev toy model for Majorana fermions (arXiv:cond-mat/0010440). First of all, his proof for the definition of the 'Majorana number' is not so clear to me. $$P(H(L_{1} ...
2
votes
1answer
122 views

Is a single particle transition allowed between two superconductors having Majorana modes?

Sorry maybe I ask a very naive and stupid question. The motivation to ask it is as follows: I am considering the parity protection of Majorana qubit based on Kitaev's 1D model. As we know, in the ...
4
votes
0answers
88 views

Is the conjectured noncommutative heavy scalar “brother” of the already detected Higgs boson is a pseudo scalar?

This is a technical (may be trivial?) question about this sigma scalar field advertised by Chamseddine and Connes to improve the electroweak vacuum stability involved by the weak mass of the already ...
8
votes
3answers
510 views

What is the most natural new physics one can expect at the TeV scale: new (supersymmetric)particles or some new (non-commutative) spacetime structure?

Up to now, nothing else than one Standard Model (SM) Higgs boson-like resonance has been found at the LHC while many predictions based on effective theories using supersymmetry require several Higgs ...
4
votes
1answer
159 views

What is an anapolar moment?

I just read this: Anapolar Dark Matter I'm not sure i've heard the term 'anapolar' before, so i google and i found this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toroidal_moment This confuses me, my ...
4
votes
1answer
232 views

Are majorana masses technically natural?

I understand that Dirac masses for fermions are "technically natural" (in the 't Hooft sense of technical naturalness) because they break chiral symmetry. In limit where the Dirac mass goes to zero, ...
4
votes
2answers
655 views

What is the importance of the Fermi energy $E_F$ or the chem. potential $\mu$ for topological superconductors

A lot of effort is put into shifting the Fermi energy of a topological insulator to exactly zero which then provides some advantages when this TI is coupled with a superconductor. I don't understand ...
4
votes
1answer
401 views

How is a Majorana fermion created when a s-wave superconductors is in proximity to a topological insulator (e.g. via an antidot)

Kane and Fu proposed a few geometries how to create Majorana zero modes using a s-wave superconductor in proximity to a 3D topological insulator (TI). -> ...
11
votes
1answer
3k views

What is a $p_x + i p_y$ superconductor? Relation to topological superconductors

I often read about s-wave and p-wave superconductors. In particular a $p_x + i p_y$ superconductor - often mentioned in combination with topological superconductors. I understand that the overall ...
17
votes
2answers
3k views

Basic questions in Majorana fermions

Why any fermion can be written as a combination of two Majorana fermions? Is there any physical meaning in it? Why Majorana fermion can be used for topological quantum computation?