The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

4
votes
1answer
490 views

Tracking down the locality assumption in a CHSH inequality derivation

CHSH inequality requires both locality and realism. I will equate here realism with counterfactual definiteness. Now counterfactual definiteness tells us that given two different measurements on the ...
0
votes
1answer
77 views

Lorentz invariance, energy-momentum conservation & the locality of interactions

I have been reading these notes ("Minkowski Spacetime: A Hundred Years Later", by Vesselin Petkov) ...
6
votes
0answers
103 views

Why don't we have logarithms or exponentials of the fields in the Lagrangians?

All tbe Lagrangian densities I have seen have always been polynomials of the fields. Is this a coincidence or is there a reason forbid, say, Lagrangians with logarithms or exponentials of the fields?
4
votes
0answers
52 views

Coincidence of spacetime events & Lorentz invariance

Am I correct in thinking that if two spacetime events are coincident in one frame of reference, then they are coincident in all frames of reference, i.e. coincidence of spacetime events is a Lorentz ...
4
votes
0answers
53 views

Locality, unitarity & vacuum energy

I've read in a set of lecture notes that the requirement of locality and unitarity in QFT imply that the vacuum must have a non-zero energy associated with it (http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05296 , top of ...
2
votes
0answers
65 views

Local symmetry and General Relativity

First I want to consider an example of 1D motion. Lagrange equation: $$ \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = 0 $$ If we transform $ L \rightarrow L+a $ ...
2
votes
0answers
92 views

How local fields transform in the holographic boundary

Consider a holographic description of gravity $f:\Omega \rightarrow \partial \Omega$ such that gravitational fields and curvature in a neighbourhood $\Omega$ of 4D spacetime induce local fields on ...
2
votes
0answers
197 views

microcausality and locality

There is this thing I got confused: Microcausality is the statement that spacelike separated local field variables commute so that we can specify field variables on a spatial slice as a complete ...
1
vote
0answers
46 views

Quantum Localization

Hi every body, Could someone please give me clarification and explanation about localization, localization length and Quantum localization? All i know is that it has something to do with diffusion. ...
1
vote
0answers
109 views

Does nonlocal theory violate causality?

Let's talk about two kinds of nonlocal theories. The first one frequently derives from integrating out part of the degrees of freedom to obtain a kind of effective theory. Probably, we get an integral ...
1
vote
0answers
151 views

QFT basics for Klein-Gordon fields

I am teaching myself QFT from Peskin for next years maths course and I have two questions: What is a c-number? Is it a complex number, and if so why does it mean, ...
1
vote
0answers
130 views

Non-Locality and Entanglement

Let’s consider a pair of particles [with their signals] comprising an isolated system. Any change in some property of either particle is due to the signal/s received from the other. Each particle has ...
0
votes
0answers
75 views

Lagrangians densities & interactions in field theory

To avoid ambiguity, this question pertains to the construction of Lagrangian densities (including interaction terms) in terms of their values at single points in spacetime. In classical mechanics in ...
0
votes
0answers
63 views

What does Bell's theorem rule out?

What exactly did Bell's theorem rule out? Did it rule out "locality", so we must give up and think of Copenhagen or maybe some realism theories (Bohmian for example)? ... That's how I understand ...
0
votes
0answers
22 views

Are unitarity and locality properties of quantum field theory somewhat capsuled in these propierties of the action?

Feynman path integral weighs all paths by a factor $e^{i\frac{S}{\hbar}}$, where $S=\int \! L \, \mathrm{d^4}x$ Two questions: Is relatedthe fact that the argument of the exponential is imaginary ...