Kaluza-Klein theory is a classical theory that unifies gravity and electromagnetism by showing that general relativity in 5-dimensions reduces to the equations of 4-dimensional general relativity and the Maxwell equations in 4 dimensions.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

2
votes
1answer
144 views

$U(1)$ 5-dimensional Kaluza-Klein topological defects

Five-dimensional Kaluza-Klein theory is well-known to predict that the electromagnetic field can be described as a curled additional dimension over four-dimensional spacetime. That is, you only need ...
0
votes
1answer
47 views

Kaluza suggested metric

Is there a book or a paper that goes into the mathematical details of getting scalar curvature of the 5 dimensional metric that Kaluza wrote down? I am running into many mathematical issues for I am ...
10
votes
0answers
208 views

Compactifying on a circle and the exchange of R and NS sectors

I've noticed a general phenomenon in compactifying on a circle where if you start with, say, an NS field, then the KK fields with an index along the circle will be in the R sector, and those without ...
5
votes
0answers
199 views
+50

Is there some no-go theorem for $D=9$ Kaluza Klein QCD+EM?

While QCD is a typical product of AdS/CFT and some other research trends in extra dimensions, I have never found in the literature an example producing the non-chiral part of the standard model, ...
2
votes
0answers
56 views

In KK theory, is proper time defined using the 5 dimensional or the 4 dimensional line element?

Let's consider five dimensional KK theory. This is Klein's metric $\hat{g}_{AB}= \begin{pmatrix} g_{00}+A_{0}A_{0}&g_{01}+A_{0}A_{1}&g_{02}+A_{0}A_{2}&g_{03}+A_{0}A_{3}&A_ 0\\ ...
2
votes
0answers
67 views

Laplacian in 4 spatial dimensions; 4th dimension warped

How can I prove the form of the Laplacian in four spatial dimensions, using the identification $y = y + 2\pi R$ for the fourth dimension and assuming the others as the usual Cartesian ones? I want to ...
2
votes
0answers
567 views

Tree level and loop level

I'm trying to read through a paper which explains the following about Universal Extra Dimensions (UED) vs ADD models: The new feature of the UED scenario compared to the brane world is that ...
1
vote
0answers
32 views

What is the significance of self-duality and anti self-duality in supergravity?

So I see the terms "self-dual" and "anti self-dual" appear routinely in supergravity/string thery, e.g. the fact that Type IIB supergravity contains a real self-dual rank-5 antisymmetric tensor ...
1
vote
0answers
71 views

Can spin angular momentum be understood as orbital angular momentum in extra dimensions?

It is to my understanding that in Kaluza-Klein theories the mass of particles can be understood as linear momentum in the extra dimensions. Let's consider in $\mathbb{R}^{1,3}\times{}B$ space-time a ...
1
vote
0answers
28 views

Compact manifold taken as an Einstein Manifold

In Kaluza-Klein theories I often see that the compact space is assumed to be an Einstein manifold, that is, its Ricci tensor is proportional to its metric. So, why is this done?
1
vote
0answers
105 views

Ricci scalar higher dimensions

I was wondering if there is a straightforward way to compute the Ricci curvature of a metric that has the form (à la Kaluza-Klein): $g_{MM}\equiv\begin{pmatrix}g_{\mu\nu}&g_{\mu ...
1
vote
0answers
138 views

Folded and/or compacted dimensions in M-theory?

I've on many occasions that there are various numbers of 'extra' dimensions above the 4th. However, I've heard that they are 'compacted' or 'folded' tightly and unimaginably small. Now, as I ...
0
votes
0answers
7 views

What about the massless vector mode in ADD model?

I have a question regarding the so called large extra dimensions model (or ADD due to Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos and Dvali). It is a extradimensional model with a 3brane to which SM forces and matter ...
0
votes
0answers
67 views

Ernst potential from Kaluza-Klein reduction of axisymmetric space-time

Following appendix A of "Ergoregions in Magnetised Black Hole Spacetimes" by G. W. Gibbons, A. H. Mujtaba and C. N. Pope, starting from the Lagrangian $$\mathcal{L} = \hat{R} - ...