The Hamiltonian formalism is a formalism in Classical Mechanics. Besides Lagrangian Mechanics, it is an effective way of reformulating classical mechanics in a simple way. Very useful in Quantum Mechanics, specifically the Heisenberg and Schrodinger formulations. Unlike Lagrangian ...

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

1
vote
1answer
49 views

I cannot verify if given transformation is canonical (CT) [on hold]

I'm going on a list of exercises and there's 6 days that I can't figure to this. Prove that given transformation is canonical: $\Large Q=\frac{p}{mw}\sin(\frac{mwq}{P})$; $\Large P=p\cos(\frac{...
1
vote
1answer
78 views

Action variables in canonical transformations

Let's suppose we have a Hamiltonian $H(p_k, q_k)$ and we want to transform it via a canonical transformation to one Hamiltonian which doesn't depend on the new coordinates $w_k$, but only in the ...
1
vote
1answer
130 views

Spherical phase space dynamics

I have a hamiltonian of the form $$H(\phi,z) = (1-z^2)\cos(2\phi) + \chi z^2$$ with position $\phi$ and conjugate momentum $z$. It has this form provided that $z \in [-1,1]$ and we have natural ...
3
votes
1answer
187 views

Do primary first class constraints change the electric field in the Hamiltonian form of Maxwell's theory?

In my understanding of Dirac's theory of constrained Hamiltonians, the primary (and also the secondary) first class constraints are generators of canonical transformations that do not change the ...
1
vote
0answers
27 views

Poisson brackets among derivatives in the constraints of the Hamiltonian formulation of General Relativity

The issue I have is from the Hamiltonian formulation of General Relativity (GR) and concerns calculation of certain Poisson brackets. In this formulation, we have the 3-dimensional metric $h_{ij}(x)$ ...
-1
votes
0answers
21 views

hamiltonian in a rotating frame [on hold]

ˆ H0 = h(ωopt − Gx)a†a + hΩb†b··· this is the hamiltonian of optomechanical system how this can be solve after switching to a frame rotating at the incomming frequency ωL.
0
votes
1answer
64 views

Determining constants of motion for this Hamiltonian? [closed]

Let $S$ be a Hamiltonian system with three degrees of freedom, let $q_1, q_2, q_3$ be the generalized coordinates. Suppose the Hamiltonian of the system is $$ H = \alpha \sum_{i=1}^3 p_i + V(q_1^2 + ...
3
votes
1answer
225 views

Deriving the Poisson bracket relation of the Ashtekar variables

I'm trying to figure out how to calculate the orthogonality of Ashtekar variables with respect to the ADM hypersurface metric and conjugate momentum. $$\{{A_a}^i(x), {E^b}_j(y)\} = 8 \pi \beta \delta^...
1
vote
1answer
30 views

Existence of stationary solutions to the Liouville equation for the harmonic oscillator

So I was trying to solve the Liouville equation, which for the classical harmonic oscillator in one dimension looks like this: $$\frac{\partial \rho }{\partial t} + \frac{p}{m} \frac{\partial \rho }{\...
11
votes
1answer
197 views

Physical Interpretation of the Graph of the Legendre Transform?

See Making Sense of the Legendre Transform and Legendre Transforms for Dummies. Look at the following diagram from the first link: I was trying to think of the simplest example to interpret this ...
3
votes
1answer
605 views

Gradient involved commutator in $\phi^4$ theory

In a phi fourth theory, the Hamiltonian density is: $$\mathcal{H}=\frac{1}{2}\pi^2+\frac{1}{2}(\nabla \phi)^2+\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2+\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4$$ Now I impose the usual equal time ...
0
votes
1answer
52 views

Legendre transform

How do they obtain this? $$g(x, y, u) = ux − f(x, y)$$ Is in page 3 after eqn 4.4.
1
vote
0answers
24 views

Demonstration that $H\star f(x,p)$ is equal to $Ef(x,p)$ for the time-independent Wigner function [closed]

I am attempting to understand why $H(x,p)\star f(x,p)=Ef(x,p)$, where $H(x,p)$ is the Hamiltonian, $\star=e^{\frac{i\hbar}{2}\left(\overleftarrow{\partial_x}\overrightarrow{\partial_p}-\overleftarrow{\...
0
votes
1answer
92 views

Hamilton-Jacobi problem

In analytical mechanics by Fasano and Marmi they consider the Hamilton-Jacobi equation for a conservative autonomous system in one dimension with the following Hamiltonian, \begin{equation} H=\frac{p^...
1
vote
1answer
27 views

Hamiltonian lattice gauge theory with physically observable local degrees of freedom

In my answer at What, in simplest terms, is gauge invariance?, I mentioned that in certain contexts there can be a "gauge theory" with a local symmetry that leave the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian invariant ...
10
votes
4answers
351 views

What makes an equation an 'equation of motion'?

Every now and then, I find myself reading papers/text talking about how this equation is a constraint but that equation is an equation of motion which satisfies this constraint. For example, in the ...
6
votes
0answers
115 views

The consistency conditions of constrained Hamiltonian systems

I am studying the Hamiltonian description of a constrained system. There are some questions puzzled me for days, which I have been stuck on it. From the lagrangian, we can obtain the primary ...
2
votes
0answers
28 views

On the Liouville-Arnold theorem

A system is completely integrable (in the Liouville sense) if there exist $n$ Poisson commuting first integrals. The Liouville-Arnold theorem, anyway, requires additional topological conditions to ...
3
votes
0answers
91 views

Learning about 4 topics in physics [closed]

This isn't really a question on any of those numerous underlying concepts behind the various sub-disciplines of physics, but hear me out: I'm still in Higher Secondary, but I'd really love to know ...
6
votes
2answers
150 views

Beyond Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics

Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations are the bedrock of particle and field theories, produce the same equations of motion, and are related through a Legendre transform. Are there more such ...
1
vote
0answers
47 views

Hamiltonian formulation of the semiclassical Model of electrons

I'm currently reading the book Solid State Physics by Neil W. Ashcroft and N. David Mermin. In Chapter 12 they introduce the "Semiclassical Model of Electron Dynamics". In short: After having solved ...
0
votes
1answer
68 views

How to find the corresponding Hamiltonian in quantum, if Hamiltonian in classical mechanics is given? [closed]

Hamiltonian in classical mechanics is $$H=wxp $$ $x=$ position, $p=$ momentum coordinate. Find the corresponding Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics!
1
vote
1answer
344 views

Canonical transformation problem

(Apologies if HW questions are not allowed -- I couldn't really find a definite answer on this) Question Let $Q^1 = (q^1)^2, Q^2 = q^1+q^2, P_{\alpha} = P_{\alpha}\left(q,p \right), \alpha = 1,2$ ...
3
votes
1answer
43 views

Derivation of Hamilton's Third Relation. Where is the mistake?

As a sort of follow-up from my previous question, I'd like to point out two derivations of Hamilton's third relation that lead to two different results. Clearly there is a mistake within the process, ...
1
vote
1answer
404 views

Hamiltonian reduction having constant of the motion

I have this $2^n*2^n$ matrix that represent the evolution of a system of $n$ spin. I know that I can have only one excited spin in my configuration a time. (eg: 0110 nor 0101 ar not permitted, but ...
4
votes
1answer
51 views

What is a “stochastic web”?

In this lecture-video (at about 37:17) on Hamiltonian dynamics, the instructor mentions that for an (Arnold-Liouville) integrable finite-dimensional Hamiltonian system one has the following: Phase-...
0
votes
0answers
76 views

Why don't we have to go through the Lagrangian in QM? [duplicate]

In classical mechanics, I remember whenever we calculated the Hamiltonian, we'd first have to calculate the Lagrangian, and then we'd get the Hamiltonian through the definition: $$H= \sum\dot q_ip_i-...
12
votes
2answers
511 views

Hamiltonian or not?

Is there a way to know if a system described by a known equation of motion admits a Hamiltonian function? Take for example $$ \dot \vartheta_i = \omega_i + J\sum_j \sin(\vartheta_j-\vartheta_i)$$ ...
4
votes
2answers
161 views

Does the conservation of the Wronskian follow from Noether's principle?

Noether's principle is the paradigm that symmetries of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian systems correspond to conservation laws of various kinds. Consider a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator $$\tag{*} \...
4
votes
1answer
91 views

Significance of symplectic form in classical field theory

I'm trying to understand the significance of construction presented to me in field theory class. Let me first briefly describe it and then ask questions. Given two solutions $\phi_1$, $\phi_2$ of the ...
8
votes
2answers
531 views

How to promote algebraic expressions to operators in quantum mechanics?

Okay, I know that in quantum mechanics the quantum observable is obtained from the classical observable by the prescription $$ X \rightarrow x,\quad P \rightarrow -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x} $...
3
votes
1answer
384 views

Reduction of Nambu Goto action to true degrees of freedom

First consider the particle $$S=m\int\sqrt{-\dot{X}^2}d\tau$$ if you choose the static gauge $\tau=X^0$ and replace it in the action you get $$=m\int\sqrt{1-\dot{X}^j\dot{X}^j}d\tau$$ So now, you ...
3
votes
4answers
851 views

Why the Hamiltonian and the Lagrangian are used interchangeably in QFT perturbation calculations

Whenever one needs to calculate correlation functions in QFT using perturbations one encounters the following expression: $\langle 0| some\ operators \times \exp(iS_{(t)}) |0\rangle$ where, ...
2
votes
1answer
136 views

Interesting Hamiltonian System [duplicate]

The definition of a Hamiltonian system I am working with is a triple $(X,\omega, H)$ where $(X,\omega)$ is a symplectic manifold and $H\in C^\infty(X)$ is the Hamiltonian function. I am wondering if ...
2
votes
1answer
35 views

My Hamiltonian for a light ray vanishes

I have the following issue with understanding. A light ray traveling from $q(\tau_1)$ to $q(\tau_2)$ minimizes the integral $\int\limits_{\tau_1}^{\tau_2} n(q(\tau))|\dot{q}(\tau)| d\tau$, so the ...
1
vote
1answer
54 views

Connection between “classical” Grassmann variables and Heisenberg Equation of motion

I have been reading di Francesco et al's textbook on Conformal Field theory, and am confused by a particular statement they make on pg 22. Let $\{\psi_i\}$ be a set of Grassmann variables. Starting ...
16
votes
11answers
10k views

Book about classical mechanics

I am looking for a book about "advanced" classical mechanics. By advanced I mean a book considering directly Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation, and also providing a firm basis in the geometrical ...
2
votes
0answers
47 views

Non-canonical transformation

I would like to know any method to transform a known non-canonical set of variables to a canonical set for a given system. The Lagrangian and Hamiltonian are known in the non-canonical variables. I ...
2
votes
1answer
53 views

Generallized Canonical Ensemble - Isobaric Ensemble

I am trying to understand the way generalized canonical ensembles like the pressure ensemble are derived from the standard canonical ensemble. In the derivation for the standard form, one defines a ...
3
votes
1answer
97 views

Is there any Hamiltonian that contains time derivative? [duplicate]

Quantum mechanics is governed by Schrodinger's equation: $$\hat{H}\psi=i\hbar\partial_t \psi$$ It seems that Hamiltonian acts on wave functions like a time derivative. Just out of curiosity, is ...
1
vote
0answers
62 views

Definition of anomalous symmetry in Hamiltonian formalism

In the Lagrangian path-integral formulation of QFT, an anomalous symmetry is defined to be a symmetry of the action which is not a symmetry of the measure of the path integral, and therefore not a ...
1
vote
1answer
72 views

Hamiltonian flow?

I was wondering what the Hamiltonian flow actually is? Here is my idea, I just wanted to know if I am correct about this. So let $(x(t),p(t))' = X_{H}(x(t),p(t))$ are the Hamilton's equations and $...
1
vote
1answer
57 views

Classical dynamics of a matrix

For a system of interacting particles, we can formulate Hamiltonian dynamics in terms of a vector of position coordinates $q$ and a vector of momentum coordinates $p$. Then the Hamiltonian takes the ...
0
votes
1answer
45 views

Correct Definition of Angular Momentum of a Charged Particle in an Electromagnetic Field? (Classical Mechanics) [duplicate]

What is the more correct definition of angular momentum $\vec{\mathbf{M}}$ in three dimensions? (I.e. classically/Lagrangian/Hamiltonian, not necessarily quantum or relativistic) $$\vec{\mathbf{M}}...
1
vote
1answer
59 views

Why does time-independent Hamiltonian not depend on angle variable?

In Landau and Lifshitz Mechanics, $\S50$ Canonical variables a time-independent Hamiltonian is considered, and a canonical transformation is done such that adiabatic invariant $I$ becomes the new ...
2
votes
2answers
227 views

How to find the rank of the matrix $\frac{\partial ^2\mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{X^\mu} \partial \dot{X^\nu} }$ for the Nambu-Goto string Lagrangian?

In this case $$\mathcal{L}~=~-T\sqrt{-\dot{X^2}X'^2+(\dot{X}\cdot X')^2}.$$ I was reading some books and papers about the constraints in the Nambu-Goto action, and all of them say something like ...
6
votes
2answers
99 views

Understanding Gibbs $H$-theorem: where does Jaynes' “blurring” argument come from?

According to this Wikipedia article, the $H$-theorem was Boltzmann's attempt to demonstrate the irreversible increase in entropy in a closed system starting from reversible microscopic mechanics. ...
2
votes
1answer
67 views

Hamiltonian from a differential equation

In my differential equations course an example is given from the Lotka-Volterra system of equations: $$ x'=x-xy$$ $$y'=-\gamma y+xy.\tag{1}$$ This is then transformed by the substitution: $q=\ln x, ...
0
votes
0answers
24 views

Are time-$t$ maps of a Hamiltonian system with 1 degree of freedom typically twist?

If we take a typical Hamiltonian system $H(q,p)$ with one degree of freedom, and look at its time-$1$ map $(q(0),p(0)) \mapsto (q(t),p(t))$, will it generically satisfy the twist property, e.g. $\...
17
votes
4answers
1k views

Equivalence between Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Mechanics

I'm reading a proof about Langrangian => Hamiltonian and one part of it just doesn't make sense to me. The Lagrangian is written $L(q, \dot q, t)$, and is convex in $\dot q$, and then the Hamiltonian ...