The central term in the hamiltonian formalism. Can be interpreted as an energy input, or "true" energy.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

2
votes
0answers
64 views

Poisson brackets and magnetic field [on hold]

I'm a maths student trying to teach myself some physics so sorry if I'm missing something simple here. I think the main problem is lack of experience with the Levi-Cevita symbol. We have a particle ...
1
vote
1answer
37 views

Commutation between Dirac hamiltonian and angular momentum

In reading about angular momentum and spin, I came across a derivation showing that the Dirac Hamiltonian does not commute with orbital angular momentum, and hence L is not conserved. What is it about ...
0
votes
1answer
43 views

What is time evolution operator?

Could you explain to me (level 1 years undergrade) what is a time evolution operator? I read on Wikipedia, and it confuses me.
3
votes
1answer
52 views

Effective theories and unbounded operators

If you have two operators, one the true Hamiltonian $H$ and one we call an effective Hamiltonian $H_{eff}$ and say they agree on every eigenvector with eigenvalue up to $E_{eff}.$ Above that, they can ...
2
votes
1answer
34 views

Do time-invariant Hamiltonians define closed systems?

In classical mechanics, every time-invariant Hamiltonian represents a closed dynamical system? Can every closed dynamical system be represented as a time-invariant Hamiltonian? Or are there closed ...
0
votes
2answers
44 views

Time-ordering and Dyson series

In Dyson series we use a time-ordered exponential by arguing that a Hamiltonian at two different instants of time does not commute. Why is it that so? Can anyone explain with example why should the ...
1
vote
0answers
69 views

In QFT do we always use normal-ordered Hamiltonian? [duplicate]

In quantization of the Dirac field I learned that we use normal ordering to get rid of negative energy vacuum state. From this point is there any reason we would use original Hamiltonian?
3
votes
2answers
110 views

How to include Berry connection in Hamiltonian?

When we calculate Berry connection, $A(R)=i<\psi(x,y)|\frac{d}{dR}|\psi(x,y)>\hat{R}$ corresponding to the Berry phase of any system, the gauge potential is related to the $R$ of the parameter ...
1
vote
3answers
148 views

Why does Hamiltonian follow the property $H^*_{ij} = H_{ji} $?

I was reading Feynman's Lectures III's Hamiltonian Matrix. There I found this property of Hamiltonian Matrix: The Hamiltonian has one property that can be deduced right away, namely, that ...
5
votes
6answers
270 views

Why does time evolution operator have the form $U(t) = e^{-itH}$?

Let's denote by $|\psi(t)\rangle$ some wavefunction at time $t$. Then let's define the time evolution operator $U(t_1,t_2)$ through $$ U(t_2,t_1) |\psi(t_1)\rangle = |\psi(t_2)\rangle \tag{1}$$ and ...
1
vote
1answer
33 views

Complex scalar theory: annihilation and creation operators give wrong commutators with Hamiltonian

The theory of a real (hermitian) scalar field can be found in many books and everywhere online. On the other hand, if we take the field non-hermitian, then I can only find notes on path integrals. I ...
2
votes
0answers
69 views

How to get Heisenberg Equation of Motion?

If a system Hamiltonian is given by, $$ ...
0
votes
1answer
113 views

Example where Hamiltonian $H \neq T+V=E$, but $E=T+V$ is conserved

I'm looking for an example of a Hamiltonian $H$, where $H\neq T+V$, but the total energy in the system, $E=T+V$, is still conserved. While I'm at it, I might as well add that I'd be most interested ...
0
votes
0answers
10 views

Trapped ion Hamiltonian: simultaneous blue and red sidebands

In the paper "Spin-motion entanglement and state diagnosis..." (Home et al., Nature, 2015), the authors talk about a single trapped ion, optically pumped, simultaneously driving the red and blue ...
2
votes
1answer
99 views

Is the Klein-Gordon Hamiltonian unbounded below?

This question is about the Klein-Gordon Hamiltonian for simplicity, but the problem seems to remain when dealing with other fields (e.g. Dirac, photon...). One usually writes the Hamiltonian ...
1
vote
1answer
72 views

A trace formula of two noncommutative operators

In many cases of quantum many-body problems, the Hamiltonian $H$ can always be divided into two parts, i.e. $H_0$ and $H'$. In this occasion, one can systemically calculate the partition function ...
0
votes
1answer
44 views

What is the form of the kinetic energy operator on a one dimensional (real space) lattice? (In second quantization)

I'm trying to figure out how one would write down the hamiltonian of a free fermion system (eventually in second quantization) on a one dimensional lattice and I'm having trouble both coming up with ...
0
votes
1answer
60 views

Any three-body Hamiltonian? [closed]

Is there an extension of spin interactions into three-body interactions such as $$H\sim \sum J \sigma_1\otimes \sigma_2 \otimes \sigma_3$$
1
vote
1answer
112 views

Quantum mechanic particle

In non relativistic quantum mechanic, we are dealing with a problem involving a particle in one dimensional space, and it has been given the potential and it reads: ...
0
votes
0answers
56 views

Constructing a dispersion relation from the Hamiltonian

I'll begin by saying that I'm not entirely clear on if this is possible. I have a Hamiltonian of the form $$ \left( \begin{array}{cccc} \text{$\omega $1} & \text{J12} & 0 & \text{J14} \\ ...
0
votes
1answer
90 views

Why do $H$ and $L^2$ commute in spherically symmetric potential?

In this PDF document (a lecture by Shivaly Reddy, page 13), he says that $L^2$ is independent of $r$; therefore it commutes with any function of $r$. This seems related to a problem in ...
0
votes
2answers
99 views

Would $[\hat{Q},\hat{H}]$ correspond to an observable? [closed]

Would $[\hat{Q},\hat{H}]$ correspond to an observable? Where $\hat{Q}$ is an observable and $\hat{H}$ is the Hamiltonian. Surely that would just mean that $[\hat{Q},\hat{H}]$ would commute i.e. = 0?: ...
2
votes
1answer
55 views

How does the Hamiltonian change when going to a moving frame?

The Hamiltonian of a free particle in a rotating frame is given by $$ H = H_0 - \omega \cdot J, $$ where $H_0$ is the Hamiltonian in the non-rotating frame, $\omega$ is the angular velocity of the ...
1
vote
1answer
56 views

Changing the zero-point energy

I have the following Hamiltonian $$\mathcal{H}(\{x_i,y_i \})=-l\sqrt{2}\sum_{i=1}^N \mathbf{f}_i \cdot \hat{\mathbf{b}}_i+E_0$$ For calculating things like the partition function it would be ...
0
votes
1answer
99 views

Jacobi energy function $h$ and the Hamilton $H$ and the Hamilton-Jacobi equation

My understanding of the Jacobi energy function $h$ as defined in Goldstein is that it is the total energy $T+V$ expressed as, \begin{equation} h(q,\dot q,t)=\sum \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q}\dot ...
3
votes
1answer
283 views

Mean field theory Weiss Approximation for the Isling Model of a Protein

A model for protein in 2D can be formed by adding bonds of fixed length $l\sqrt{2}$ on a square lattice along the diagonal, ie $\hat{\mathbf{b}}_i=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\pm \hat{\mathbf{x}}\pm ...
1
vote
1answer
53 views

What does it mean for a quantum particle to have energy $E_n$? And what is its general normalised state?

In this particular case, I have found the energy to be quantised with energy levels $\frac{h^2n^2}{2m} >0 $ where $n$ is an integer. Suppose a particle has energy $E=\frac{4h^2}{2m}$, then this ...
0
votes
0answers
35 views

Does the time Evolution operator commute with the both free and interaction Hamiltonian?

Consider a quantum system (finite dimensional) which has overall Hamiltonian: $H_s = H_0 + w(s)H_c$ with $H_0, H_c$ constant in time and traceless and $w(t)$ a, not too badly behaved, function of ...
1
vote
1answer
140 views

How do we find the phase space density from the Hamiltonian?

How do we find the phase space density from the Hamiltonian? For example: Consider a classical gas made of N identical non-interacting particles in 1d. Each molecule is characterised by centre mass ...
0
votes
1answer
48 views

Trick for reformulating in terms of centre of mass and relative variables

I am working through a problem that has caused me difficulties in the past. I have the Hamiltonian $$\mathcal{H}=\frac{p_1^2}{2m_1}+\frac{p_2^2}{2m_2}+\frac{k}{2}(q_1-q_2)^2$$ I want to express the ...
1
vote
1answer
56 views

The grand partition function of non interacting hamiltonians

In the case of non interacting particles I know we can write the Hamiltonian as $$H(\mathbf{q}_1,\dots,\mathbf{p}_1,\dots)=\sum_{i=1}^N h(\mathbf{q}_i,\mathbf{p}_i)$$ but I am having trouble ...
1
vote
0answers
45 views

Hamiltonian flow?

I was wondering what the Hamiltonian flow actually is? Here is my idea, I just wanted to know if I am correct about this. So let $(x(t),p(t))' = X_{H}(x(t),p(t))$ are the Hamilton's equations and ...
2
votes
2answers
145 views

What is the meaning of commuting Hamiltonians?

I have two quantum mechanical Hamiltonians such that \begin{equation} [\hat{H}_1,\hat{H}_2] = 0, \end{equation} where $\hat{H}_1$ and $\hat{H}_2$ act on the same set of states. What is there to ...
0
votes
0answers
49 views

Time evolution of interaction Hamiltonian in the Heisenberg picture

How does the interaction Hamiltonian of a (finite dim) quantum system with Hamiltonian: $H(t) = H_0 + w(t) H_I$ evolve in time in the Heisenberg picture. Is there anything special about the way ...
0
votes
1answer
100 views

Commutator and Hamiltonian [closed]

Assume that $[\hat{A},\hat{H}]_-=0$ and $[\hat{B},\hat{H}]_-=0$ but we know that $[\hat{A},\hat{B}]_-\neq 0$. Then there exists degenerate stationary states of $H$. How to prove it?
0
votes
0answers
66 views

Unitary evolution operator

Assume we have a system in a state $\psi$ that is a superposition of eigenvectors of some observable $A$. Now we make a measurement of the observable $A$; the state after the measurement $\phi$ is a ...
2
votes
2answers
108 views

Time dependent Hamiltonian and Gauge invariance

In general, in quantum mechanics we can prove probability current or the Schrodinger equation and other quantities are gauge invariant. However, the Hamiltonian isn't gauge invariant. Under a gauge ...
5
votes
2answers
158 views

Momentum is a cotangent vector?

Imagine we have a particle described by $x \in M$, where $M$ is some manifold, then it is very intuitive I think that a velocity is an element of the tangent space at $x$, so $x' \in T_{x}M.$ Thus, by ...
0
votes
0answers
53 views

Computing the probability density of wavefunctions

Suppose I am given a Hamiltonian operator $\hat{H}$ that satisfies the time-independent Schrödinger equation $$\hat{H} \psi = E\psi$$ I can compute energy eigenvalues and their associated ...
1
vote
0answers
40 views

How geometry, and hence, a tight-binding Hamiltonian dictates the eigenvalues?

Considering an 'N' atom system, how should we understand the geometric dependence on the calculated eigenvalue spectrum by solving the nearest neighbor tight-binding Hamiltonian? A simple example ...
0
votes
2answers
83 views

Energy conservation $\iff \frac{dE}{dt} = 0\ $?

If I'm asked to prove that a system is/ isn't conservative and compare it to whether or not the Hamiltonian is conserved, does that mean I need to compute the time derivative of energy $(T+U)$? Doing ...
5
votes
3answers
154 views

Does Peskin & Schroeder Eq. (4.26), $U(t_1,t_2)U(t_2,t_3) = U(t_1,t_3)$ imply $[H_0,H_{int}] = 0$?

Peskin & Schroeder equation (4.17) define the operator, \begin{equation} U(t,t_{0})~=~e^{i(t-t_{0})H_{0}}e^{-i(t-t_{0})H} \tag{4.17} \end{equation} where $$H~=~H_0+H_{\text{int}}\tag{4.12}$$ is ...
0
votes
1answer
64 views

Commuting with time evolution operator implies commuting with Hamiltonian

Consider a quantum system (finite dimensional) has overall Hamiltonian: $H_t = H_0 + w(t)H_c$ with $H_0, H_c$ constant in time and traceless and $w(t)$ a, not too badly behaved, function of time. ...
1
vote
1answer
60 views

Formulating a symplectic integrator for a non-local Hamiltonian

I recently asked two questions, Q. [1] and Q. [2], regarding reformulating non-local Lagrangians as Hamiltonians. In these questions, the Hamiltonian is formulated as an integral because of it's ...
0
votes
0answers
33 views

CSCO and Hamiltonian

Is there a relationship between the Hamiltonian and the number of observables needed in a CSCO to fully describe a quantum system? I am thinking that a new observable is needed each time there is a ...
0
votes
0answers
37 views

Why doesn't a quantum pairwise Hamiltonian couple states in which more than one interaction occurs?

This question is about the standard quantum mechanical pairwise interaction Hamiltonian. I'll phrase it in terms of an example using Rydberg atoms, but you could just as well imagine spins (for ...
1
vote
1answer
60 views

Average Energy of a coherent state

The question is relating to a previous problem concerning the harmonic oscillator. Determine the average energy < E > in a coherent state |alpha>. From my understanding the expectation of the ...
0
votes
0answers
60 views

Does the additivity property of Integrals of motion and Lagrangians valid in all situations?

I would like to know if the additivity property of an integral (constant) of motion valid in all situations ? It works for energy but does it work for all other integrals of motion in all kinds of ...
1
vote
3answers
212 views

Quantum Mechanincs - Dirac notation and solving time dependant schrodinger [closed]

The $\hat{S}_{x},\hat{S}_{y},\hat{S}_{z}$ obviously correlate to $x,y,z$ components of the operators. Consider the Hamiltonian: $$\hat{H}=C*(\vec{B} \cdot \vec{S})$$ where $C$ is a ...
0
votes
1answer
91 views

How much information does the Hamiltonian contain in quantum mechanics? [closed]

Given a Hamiltonian, let's say of a many-body system, through the Schrodinger equation,in principle we can find the eigenfunctions and their corresponding eigenvalues (spectrum). Now given an ...