Group theory is a branch of abstract algebra. A group is a set of objects, together with a binary operation, that satisfies four axioms. The set must be closed under the operation and contain an identity object. Every object in the set must have an inverse, and the operation must be associative. ...

learn more… | top users | synonyms

0
votes
0answers
28 views

Uses of the accidental isomorphism $SO(5)\sim Sp(2)$?

Some of the accidental isomorphisms of low dimensional Lie algebras have very important applications in physics. The theory of angular momentum makes use of the fact that $SO(3)\sim SU(2)$. ...
2
votes
1answer
38 views

$SU(2)$ generators and creation annihilation operators

The algebraic method to find the irreducible representation of the $SU(2)$ group makes use of the operators: $$J_z\\J_+=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(J_x+iJ_y)\\J_-=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(J_x-iJ_y)$$ In the book ...
0
votes
0answers
10 views

Explanation for orientation entanglement

I have to write a summary for "orientation-entanglement": the state of an object/subsystem depends in general not only (locally) on its configuration in space, but also (nonlocally) on its topological ...
2
votes
0answers
19 views

Group theory of quark model [closed]

I am trying to understand the group theoretical aspects of quark model. In chapter 11 - Hypercharge and Strangeness- in the book titled 'Lie Algebras in Particle Physics' by H. Georgi, I am not able ...
0
votes
0answers
15 views

normal degeneracy and the “span” of an irreducible representation

In Tinkham's "Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics", Tinkham defines normal degeneracy so that the span of the action of the Hamiltonian's symmetry group on any energy eigenstate yields all possible ...
4
votes
1answer
71 views

Complete derivation of generator of rotations

I have been look all across the internet and every book I could find trying to get a full derivation of the generator of rotations and more specifically angular momentum as a generator of rotations. I ...
1
vote
2answers
51 views

Half-integer spin and infinitesimal rotations

On p. 692 of 'Quantum Mechanics' by Cohen-Tannoudji, he states that: Every finite rotation can be decomposed into an infinite number of infinitesimal rotations, since the angle of rotation can ...
0
votes
0answers
29 views

How is SO(2) compact according to this definiton? [migrated]

According to MathWorld, a compact Lie group is a group whose parameters vary over a closed interval. I'm not sure if this definition is rigorous enough. I've also seen a similar definition here: ...
1
vote
1answer
56 views

Problem with determining number of goldstone bosons

Consider a theory $$\mathcal{L}=(\partial_\mu\Phi^\dagger)(\partial^\mu\Phi)-\mu^2(\Phi^\dagger\Phi)-\lambda(\Phi^\dagger\Phi)^2$$ where $\Phi=\begin{pmatrix}\phi_1+i\phi_2\\ ...
2
votes
0answers
36 views

Finding Casimir operators for the Poincare group $ISO(1,2)$

I was asked to write the generators for translations and Lorentz-transforms in 1+2 dimensions and then to find the Casimir operators. For the generators I can take the same ones as in 1+3 case ...
0
votes
0answers
13 views

The Wigner 3j-Symbol and Kronecker delta

If you look up the definition of the Wigner 3j-Symbol (e.g. on Wolfram) you'll find $m_1+m_2=M$ must be satisfied. Does that mean that, for an arbitrary Wigner 3j-Symbol I could replace: $ ...
0
votes
1answer
53 views

Is the fundamental representation of $SU(3)$ irreducible?

I want to check if the fundamental representation of $SU(3)$ is irreducible. The algebra is $$\mathbb{su}(3) = \{ m \in Mat(3,\mathbb{C} )\ |\ m = -m^+,\ Tr[m] = 0 \}$$ and I've found the generators. ...
0
votes
2answers
50 views

How would I relate $\Lambda=e^{-i\omega_{\mu\nu}J^{\mu\nu}/2}$ to the Lorentz boost matrix?

$\omega_{\mu\nu}$ contains infinitesimal parameters and $J^{\mu\nu}$ contains generators of boost and rotation. Any 4-vector transforms as $p^\mu=\Lambda^\mu_\nu p^\nu$. Starting from given ...
2
votes
0answers
50 views

Relation between representations/classifications

Generally a quantum system can be characterized in the following way: its states form a representation space for every symmetry group of that system. The representation has to be unitary (or ...
5
votes
2answers
167 views

Is a spinor in some sense connected to space?

Spinors transform under the representation of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ which is the double cover of the Lorentz group $SO(1,3)$ - or in the non-relativistic case under $SU(2)$, the double cover of $SO(3)$. ...
2
votes
0answers
46 views

What is the difference between the groups $PSU(N)$ and $SU(N)$? [closed]

What is the difference between the groups $PSU(N)$ and $SU(N)$? For example how is $PSU(2,2|4)$ different than $SU(2,2|4)$?
1
vote
1answer
54 views

If isospin is conserved under strong interactions why it is represented by SU(2)?

As far as I know from my readings SU(2) is a representation group of isospin symmetry which shows deep symmetry of the strong force which conserves flavor. Isospin symmetry is broken under weak ...
0
votes
1answer
48 views

Why is the Poincaré group non-abelian?

Based on what I've learned, I gather the Poincaré group is the group of isometries of Minkowski spacetime and it is a non-abelian Lie group. Why is it non-abelian? Or perhaps rather, does the fact ...
1
vote
0answers
43 views

Why use class multiplication to describe topological entangling and merging?

I'm studying some references about topological defects in ordered media like Soft matter physics: An introduction by Kleman and the Review modern physics paper The topological theory of defects in ...
1
vote
2answers
108 views

Tensor product of two different Pauli matrices $\sigma_2\otimes\eta_1 $

I'm solving problem 3.D in H. Georgi Lie Algebra etc for fun where one is to compute the matrix elements of the direct product $\sigma_2\otimes\eta_1$ where $[\sigma_2]_{ij}\text{ and }[\eta_1]_{xy}$ ...
0
votes
3answers
70 views

$SO(3)$, $SU(2)$ and symmetries in quantum mechanics [duplicate]

A rotation in the vector space $\mathbb{R}^3$ is represented by the known 3x3-matrices. But at this point I'm really confused how to get from there to Quantum Mechanics. The group of ...
2
votes
0answers
19 views

Simplification of matrix-element given the Wigner-Eckardt theorem and Clebsch-Gordon coefficients of a 1,1/2 system

How can I simplify the following matrix-elements $$\left\langle 1,1/2;m_1,m_2\left| S \right| 1,1/2;m_1^{'},m_2^{'} \right\rangle$$ given the Wigner-Eckard theorem $$\left\langle j,m|S|j^{'},m^{'} ...
2
votes
1answer
55 views

Does $GL(N,\mathbb{R})$ own spinor representation? Which group is its covering group? (Kaku's QFT textbook)

In Kaku's QFT textbook page 54, there is a saying: $GL(N)$ does not have any finite-dimensional spinorial representation. This implicates that $GL(N)$ owns infinite-dimensional spinorial ...
4
votes
0answers
77 views

Group theory and quantum optics

This is a question about application of group theory to physics. The starting point is the group $SU(n)$. I have a representation $R$ of $SU(n)$ that takes values on the unitary group on an infinite ...
2
votes
2answers
83 views

What's the degree of freedom of this kind of matrix?

We first have a unitary matrix $$\{a_{ij}\}\quad(n\times n)$$ I know how to calculate its degree of freedom, which is $n^2$ if we consider a real variable as one degree of freedom. Now we have a ...
3
votes
1answer
77 views

Subgroup of Lorentz Group Generated by Boosts

It is common knowledge that a composition of boosts is not a boost, but involves a rotation. Further, in discussions of Thomas precession, it is often stated that boosting in $x$, then $y$, then back ...
4
votes
1answer
66 views

How can we measure chirality in experiments?

Chirality is a concept quite different from helicity. These two concepts only happen to have the same numerical value for massless particles. I understand that we can measure helicity, but how can we ...
3
votes
1answer
59 views

Is there a general theorem stating why the restricted Lorentz group's exponential map is surjective?

The exponential map for the restricted Lorentz group is surjective. An outline of why is shown on the wiki page Representation Theory of the Lorentz Group. Is there a more general theorem that states ...
3
votes
2answers
139 views

Why is the $(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})$ representation of the Lorentz group realized as the vector space of complex $2\times 2$ matrices?

Why can we write an arbitrary object $v_{a \dot{b} }$ our transformations in this basis act on as $$ v_{a \dot{b} } = v_{\nu} \sigma^{ \nu}_{a \dot{b} } = v^0 \begin{pmatrix} 1&0 \\ 0&1 ...
3
votes
2answers
83 views

Identifying irreps of $SU(2)$

How does one verify that, the representations of $SU(2)$ corresponding to $j=1/2$ or $j=1$ is irreducible? I think showing the irreducibility (taking the representative matrices into a block-diagonal ...
9
votes
1answer
144 views

What exactly do we mean by symmetry in physics?

I'm referring here to invariance of the Lagrangian under Lorentz transformations. There are two possibilities: Physics does not depend on the way we describe it (passive symmetry). We can choose ...
9
votes
2answers
205 views

If $v_{a \dot{b}}$ transforms like a four-vector, what does $v_{a}^{\dot{b}}$ describe?

The $( \frac{1}{2}, 0)$ representation of the Lorentz group acts on left-chiral spinors $\chi_a$, the $( 0,\frac{1}{2} )$ representation on right-chiral spinors $\chi^{\dot a}$. The $( \frac{1}{2}, ...
4
votes
1answer
111 views

How to interpret spin observables constructed by non-standard phase choices?

If we try to find matrix elements of ladder operators ( $J_{\pm}$) for spin when they act on eigenstates of $J^2$ and $J_z$ ( $\newcommand{ket}[1]{\left|#1\right\rangle} ...
8
votes
1answer
84 views

Group notation $\otimes$ and $\oplus$ used for representations of quarks and mesons

I've been trying to figure out this statement from the PDG quark model summary (PDF). Following $\mathrm{SU}(3)$, the nine possible $q\bar{q}′$ combinations containing the light $u$, $d$, and $s$ ...
1
vote
1answer
58 views

Physical interpretation of diffeomorphism from $SO(3)$ to $\mathbb R \mathbb P^3$

I am not good at picturing either $SO(3)$ or $\mathbb R \mathbb P^3$, the latter denoting the real projective space. Can someone give me a rough physical understanding of the geometry and implication ...
2
votes
0answers
44 views

Decomposing a representation under a subgroup [closed]

I am trying to understand what is the method for decomposing representations of a group under one of its subgroups. I already had a look in Slansky, but I could not extract a concrete set of ...
4
votes
0answers
71 views

Branching rules for $SU(3)$

How does one compute the branching rules for $SU(3)\to SU(2)\times U(1)$.? In particular, I do not know how to put the abelian charges. Take for example the adjoint $\mathbf{8}$ of $SU(3)$. I can ...
2
votes
1answer
80 views

Geometry, Group Theory, and Statistical Mechanics

During the course of my first statistical mechanics course we generally concerned ourselves with a bulk amount of our system and considered it in terms of a set of lattice sites that had a state. How ...
1
vote
0answers
28 views

What is the largest subgroup of the Galilean group and the Lorentz group?

What is the largest subgroup of the Galilean group and the Lorentz group? In the book Structure of Dynamical Systems - A Symplectic View of Physics by J.-M. Souriau, the author mentions (p. 168), ...
1
vote
0answers
22 views

Reference request: Relation between $Sp(N)$, $Spin(N) $, $SU(N)$ groups and physics [duplicate]

I want to understand the relationship of the so common $SU(N)$ and $SO(N)$ groups in physics with the symplectic group which I think is the double cover of the first and the Spin groups $Spin(N)$. Is ...
2
votes
1answer
55 views

Representations of subalgebra in the super virasoro algebra

In the Virasoro algebra, which is generated by $L_n$, one has the obvious subalgebra spanned by $L_{-1}$ ,$L_{1}$ and $L_{0}$ which is isomorphic to the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{R})$. The ...
1
vote
1answer
41 views

What conserved quantities does a one-dimensional non-symmetric lattice have?

When I asked what leads to degeneracy of eigenstates of free particle, the answer was parity. But it appears that even if we consider a lattice with non-symmetric cell, so the potential looks as shown ...
2
votes
1answer
73 views

How to diagonalise the Lagrangian mass term with SU(4) symmetry and self-dual tensors

I should write the mass term of the Lagrangian with global SO(4) symmetry in tensor representation with anti-symmetric tensors and then diagonalise this term with defining a new set of tensors ...
5
votes
0answers
126 views

How to calculate $3\otimes 3$ and $3\otimes 3\otimes 3$ in $SU(3)$? [closed]

EDIT: I have boiled my question down to How many independent components does a rank three totally symmetric tensor have in $n$ dimensions? A derivation would be nice too. OP: I know that I can ...
5
votes
2answers
80 views

SU(3) antiquark triplet transformation

I'm reading a rather elementary particle physics text, Modern Particle Physics by Thomson. He is staying away from the heavy group theoretic stuff. He derives the transformation law for an SU(2) ...
2
votes
1answer
108 views

Is there a connection between Lie Groups and observable quantities in physics?

Good evening everybody. I have some questions about the relation between Lie groups and observables in physics. Indeed, taking the example of spin formalism of Quantum mechanics I know that Pauli's ...
2
votes
1answer
70 views

Unitary representations of $SO(3)$ and $so(3)$

According to my skript: Quantum mechanic states $ψ ∈ \mathcal H$ changes under a rotation $R ∈ \text{SO(3)}, \vec{x} \rightarrow R\vec{x}$ according to $ψ \rightarrow U(R)ψ$, whereas $U(R)$ is a ...
3
votes
3answers
405 views

In physics, what is the importance of distinguishing between a matrix and a group? [closed]

On the topic of Pauli matrices, I have noticed that some authors tend to use the term matrix and group interchangeably. I am asking because I do not see see any profound difference referring to the ...
4
votes
0answers
54 views

Why the bosonic part of the superconformal group $SU(2,2|1)$ is $SO(4,1) \times U(1)_R$?

Why in $d=4$ $\mathcal{N}=1$ SCFT the bosonic part of the superconformal group $SU(2,2|1)$ is $SO(4,1) \times U(1)_R$? More generally how can I determine the such a thing in other theories? Is there ...