Use as a synonym to the representation-theory tag

learn more… | top users | synonyms

5
votes
1answer
219 views

Is a $SU(2)$ supergauge theory really a $SU(2)$ gauge theory?

Consider $SU(2)$ supergauge theory with $A$, a doublet of two chiral superfields in the fundamental representation. $$A= \begin{pmatrix} \Phi_1\\ \Phi_2 \end{pmatrix}$$ where $\Phi_1$ and $\Phi_2$ ...
2
votes
1answer
136 views

$SU(3)$ Tensor Methods in a Tetraquark

I am trying to understand the Georgi chapter of tensor methods in $SU(3)$ representations, and I don't know how to resolve the tensor product of 2 matrices in a 2 heavy quark + 2 light antiquark ...
1
vote
1answer
77 views

Angular momentum in baryon multiplets

In the Murray Gell-Mann model, particles are brought together as a function of their angular momentum. The classification diagrams can be seen as irreducible representations of $SU(3)$, following ...
4
votes
1answer
117 views

Representation of the Lorentz group

Is there any representation of the Lorentz group where $$U^{-1} f(x) U = f(\lambda^{-1}x)$$ other than the (0,0) representation? If not then is it possible for a field (with a well defined polynomial ...
2
votes
2answers
125 views

Does every Hilbert Space carry a representation of Poincare group?

We know all infinite dimensional Hilbert Spaces are unitarily equivalent. It should follow therefore that if I have an unitary representation of say Lorentz or Poincare group on one infinite ...
1
vote
2answers
79 views

Complex conjugation of Weyl Spinors

Let $\chi$ be a left-handed Weyl spinor transforming as $$\delta\chi=\frac{1}{2}\omega_{\mu\nu}\sigma^{\mu\nu}\chi.$$ In my lecture notes it is explicitly stated that complex conjugation interchanges ...
1
vote
0answers
42 views

Is the coordinate transformation of an object the same of the action of a group on this same object?

I am having troubles in understanding frame transformations in physics from the mathematical point of view. What I understand for a coordinate transformation is just a function to one chart to another ...
1
vote
2answers
344 views

Operator vs. Matrix in quantum formalism

We use in Dirac formalism of QM the tool of operators and kets in spatial and spin spaces to obtain eigenvalues and eigenkets. But the operation here is simply that of a matrix multiplication. Now ...
4
votes
1answer
170 views

What defines the spin of a certain field? (formally)

Update: see the restatement of the question below! I've seen this question over and over through the archive of questions, but so far the closer to an answer was this. But I still don't understand. ...
4
votes
1answer
178 views

Difference between Cartesian product and tensor product on gauge groups

After a comment of John Baez from a question I asked about on MathOverflow I would like to ask what is the difference between, for example, $SU(3)\times SU(2) \times U(1) $ and $SU(3) \otimes SU(2) \...
20
votes
1answer
534 views

Why exactly do sometimes universal covers, and sometimes central extensions feature in the application of a symmetry group to quantum physics?

There seem to be two different things one must consider when representing a symmetry group in quantum mechanics: The universal cover: For instance, when representing the rotation group $\mathrm{SO}(...
1
vote
1answer
163 views

Trivial representation in Clebsch-Gordan decomposition

My professor defined the Clebsch-Gordan series as the direct sum decomposition of the tensor product of two representations of the Lie group SU(2): $$ D_{j_1} \otimes D_{j_2} = D_{j_1+j_2} \oplus D_{...
7
votes
1answer
146 views

Why complexify in order to construct Dirac representation?

Suppose we have a theory is covariant under the Spin group Spin(2n-1; 1). We consider the real vector space $V = R^{2n-1,1}$, which naturally comes with a Lorentzian inner product. On this vector ...
2
votes
1answer
167 views

How do simple two-component Fierz identities follow from a property of the Pauli matrices?

On page 51 Peskin and Schroeder are beginning to derive basic Fierz interchange relations using two-component right-handed spinors. They start by stating the trivial (but tedious) Pauli sigma identity ...
1
vote
1answer
108 views

Unitarily Inequivalent Representations

The definition of unitarily equivalent representations I am using is the one given here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haag%27s_theorem. Now in this text http://www.sa.infn.it/Massimo.Blasone/...
1
vote
1answer
78 views

Regarding different representations of the Lorentz Group & its defining properties

Take $\Lambda$ to be a Lorentz matrix, it satisfying $\Lambda^T \eta \Lambda=\eta$. By writing $\Lambda=\exp[-\frac{i}{2}\omega_{\mu\nu}\mathcal J^{\mu\nu}]$, we find that the generators satisfy $$ [\...
1
vote
0answers
55 views

Mass, Spin, Internal Energy and 1-Particle States in Galilean Quantum Mechanics

I have been reading an article discussing the unitary representation of Galilean group and non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The link to the article is given below. http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.2442 ...
4
votes
1answer
236 views

Anomaly cancellation in the standard model (calculating the symmetrized trace of generators)

The Problem We can show that the condition for the Standard Model to be anomaly-free is that the symmetrized trace over the generators of the gauge group vanishes: \begin{align} \text{tr} \big(\{\...
4
votes
0answers
124 views

The classification of particles or fields in general spacetime- Is it still meaningful to say spin-0, 1/2 ,1 field in general spacetime? [closed]

In 3+1 dim Minkovski spacetime, the classification of particle or field, that is spin-0, 1/2 , 1..., depends on the representation of the universal covering group of $SO(1,3)$, that is $SL(2,C)$. When ...
0
votes
0answers
37 views

trace of spherical components of an angular momentum multiplet

My basic mathematical question is whether or not there exist selection rules regarding the traces of the spherical tensor components of some operator acting on some subspace of definite total angular ...
3
votes
1answer
108 views

Representations of Lorentz group in interacting QFT

In QFT, we obtain a representation of the Lorentz group by defining a set of unitary operators whose action on (spinless) free particle states is given by \begin{equation} U(\Lambda) |k \rangle = |\...
0
votes
0answers
53 views

Why is the tensor product $n \otimes n = 1$ for $SO(n)$ not the usual scalar product?

For concreteness let's consider $SO(4)$. The quantum numbers for the four states in the fundamental representations are (schematically) $$ (1, 1) ,(-1, 1) ,(1, -1) ,(-1, -1 )$$ thus $$ 4= \...
0
votes
0answers
43 views

Double groups in Crystallography

I'm currently studying double point groups and their applications in condensed matter physics. Let me start by giving you the definition of the double group that is used in my textbook: Let $G$ be a ...
2
votes
1answer
115 views

How unique are the quantum numbers we commonly use?

We use the eigenvalues of the Cartan generators (=diagonal generators) of a given gauge group as quantum numbers in physics. Are these numbers somehow fixed and if not, what transformations are ...
1
vote
2answers
112 views

What does it mean by saying the generators of translations transform as vectors under the Lorentz Group?

The commutator of generators of Lorentz transformation and translation is as follow: $$[M^{\mu\nu},P^\sigma]=i(P^\mu\eta^{\nu\sigma}-P^\nu\eta^{\mu\sigma} ).$$ Then from this we usually say that the ...
4
votes
1answer
144 views

On the Lorentz Group representation [closed]

I am going through the notes on QFT by Srednicki (which is certainly a worth reading on the subject, and can be found online, see http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/qft.html). When describing fermions,...
10
votes
0answers
100 views

Degenaracy in mass of $8$ and $27$ reps of $SU(3)$ in Coleman's Aspects of Symmetry [closed]

In Coleman's Aspect of symmetry he proposes an amusing problem in the first chapter. It asks us to consider a set of eight pseudo-scalar fields transforming in the adjoint representation of $SU(3)$. ...
1
vote
1answer
69 views

How to check if some term in the Lagrangian involving gauge bosons is gauge invariant without explicit computations?

Normally (for fermions and scalars) we can simply use the decomposition of tensor products of gauge group representations to find invariant terms that we can write into the Lagrangian. For example ...
0
votes
1answer
139 views

Do gauge bosons really transform according to the adjoint representation of the gauge group?

Its commonly said that gauge bosons transform according to the adjoint representation of the corresponding gauge group. For example, for $SU(2)$ the gauge bosons live in the adjoint $3$ dimensional ...
1
vote
2answers
144 views

Rest Mass and Wigner's Classification

I believe (but please correct me if I'm wrong) that I understand the basic philosophy and most of the mathematics involved in Wigner's classification of particles via group representations. But I'm ...
3
votes
1answer
117 views

Representation of the Standard Model group $SU(3) \times SU(2) \times U(1)$

As the gauge group of the Standard Model is $SU(3) \times SU(2) \times U(1)$, would the associated fermions fields be the product of a triplet, a doublet and a singlet, for all particles, or is that ...
1
vote
1answer
152 views

How is the Full Standard Model group representation displayed?

I have often seen, on YouTube lectures and textbooks, the direct product gauge group representation listed below and it is often accompanied with a statement to the effect that "this is how we sum ...
1
vote
0answers
51 views

Invariant linearly independent scalar potential construction for product groups

Lets say one has a gauge group for example SU(n) or SO(n) and has a scalar field which belongs to a certain representation (m-ranked tensor). If one wants to write down the invariant potential for the ...
1
vote
1answer
281 views

Do particles have spin because there exist spinor representations for the Lorentz group?

I am reading Peskin and Schroeder's An introduction to field theory. They first describe the spinor representation of the Lorentz group, and then they mention the fact that different particles have ...
2
votes
1answer
121 views

Representation of U(1) on fock space

I am currently reading up on the use of group theory in physics using Peter Woit's book draft (available on his homepage). I do understand the mathematical concepts but have a bit of a problem making ...
2
votes
0answers
70 views

Traceless Tensors in $SU(3)$, Georgi's Lie Algebras

I'm doing a self-study through Georgi's Lie Algebra's in Particle Physics and there is a ''note without proof'' in the book that I have not managed to see through myself. In Section 10.3, Georgi ...
3
votes
1answer
106 views

Finding Electronic Energy Levels by Representation Theory

Let $$u=\left( \begin{array}{cccc} c_1&c_2&c_3&c_4 \end{array} \right)^T$$ for $$\psi = c_1\psi_1 + c_2\psi_2 + c_3\psi_3+ c_4\psi_4$$ We assume that $\left<\psi_i|\psi_j\right> = \...
6
votes
3answers
528 views

Explaining a quote by Weinberg about the signifcance of symmetry groups in physics

When skimming through a book, I found this quote: The universe is an enormous direct product of representations of symmetry groups. —Steven Weinberg I am a mathematician (so I know only basic ...
0
votes
1answer
77 views

Getting to spins of arbitrary direction

Let me rephrase this question: Let us assume we know that symmetry transformations always look like this: $$U(s)=e^{iKs} $$ with a hermitian Operator K. This tells us that for very small $s$: $$U(...
1
vote
1answer
81 views

Representations of Lorentz algebra

It is well known that the Lorentz algebra can be written as two $SU(2)$ algebras. By defining $$N_i=\frac{1}{2}(J_i+iK_i), \qquad N^{\dagger}_i=\frac{1}{2}(J_i-iK_i)$$ we have $[N_i,N_j]=i\...
1
vote
0answers
37 views

symmetry group of multi-electron atom

Neglecting spin effects, the energy levels of multi-electron atoms are characterized by states of definite total orbital ($L^2$) and spin angular momentum ($S^2$). From this it seems that the ...
2
votes
2answers
238 views

Where does the Lorentz boost for a Dirac spinor come from?

I have read, that if you have a Dirac spinor \begin{equation} \psi = \begin{pmatrix} \phi_R\\ \phi_L \end{pmatrix} \end{equation} that you can apply a Lorentz boost along the $z$-direction with ...
1
vote
0answers
89 views

Decomposition of a tensor under transformations

To illustrate my question I'll take an example from theory of relativity: An arbitrary 4-tensor $A^{ik}$ changes under a general coordinate transformation: $$ A'^{ik} = C^{i}_mC^{k}_n A^{mn} $$ (...
3
votes
2answers
183 views

Why do decompositons like $16 \otimes 16 = 10 \oplus 120 \oplus 126$ tell us which Higgs representations we can use?

EDIT: I found an answer, which I do not understand: In Gürsey - Symmetry breaking patterns in E6 he writes: " Because of Fermi-Dirac statistics of fermions they must occur in the symmetric part of ...
1
vote
1answer
816 views

Spin commutation relations

For orbital angular momentum defined as $L= r \times p $ we can prove, in quantum mechanics, the commutation relations. Also, we could prove these relationships through the study of rotations (...
3
votes
3answers
73 views

Uniqueness of expression of a Lie group element

Just take the SU(2) group as an example. The three generators are $J_z$, $J_+$, and $J_-$. For an element $ g $, sometimes we want to express it as $$ g = e^{i a J_+} e^{i b J_z} e^{i c J_-} . $$ ...
2
votes
1answer
264 views

Why $SU(3)$ has eight generators?

The generators of $SU(3)$ group are Gell-Mann matrices and one can construct these generators from Pauli spin matrices, basically expanding in 3d and rotating about each axis. Take $\sigma_3$, assume ...
1
vote
3answers
119 views

Calculations with angular momentum

Is the following correct, when adding 3 angular momenta/spins: \begin{align} 1\otimes 1\otimes \frac{1}{2}&=\left(1\otimes 1\right)\otimes \frac{1}{2} \\ &=\left(2\oplus 1\oplus 0\right)\...
3
votes
1answer
830 views

How to use Clebsch-Gordan coefficients for 3 particles?

I have a Hamiltonian for 3 particles of spin 1 that I boiled down to: \begin{equation} k(\textbf{S}^2+\cdots), \end{equation} where: \begin{equation} \textbf{S}=\textbf{S}_1+\textbf{S}_2+\textbf{S}_3. ...
2
votes
1answer
282 views

Spinors and Möbius strips

I asked this question on Math.SE as I thought the perspective of representation theory might be enlightening. But since the question was provoked by a description of Spinors describing the spin of ...