The tag has no usage guidance.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (2)

0
votes
0answers
3 views

Water flow in salt solutions contemporary exposed to an electrical and constant magnetic field

When a permanent magnet is held motionless close to a salt solution which already has been exposed to an electrical field a flow in the water will be induced and can be detected by applying some ...
1
vote
0answers
28 views

Fayet-Iliopolous Parameters from Separation of NS5-branes in $(x_{7}, x_{8}, x_{9})$: An ambiguity as to which gauge group the FI parameter belongs

hep-th/9611230v3, page 12 explains how, for a configuration of D3s along $(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{6})$, and NS5's along $(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}, x_{5})$, the Fayet-Iliopolous D-term coefficient $\zeta$ ...
1
vote
1answer
43 views

A question to gauge fixing in nonabelian gauge theories

In quantum gauge theories it is usual to fix the gauge with the equation $\partial^\mu A_\mu = 0$ where $A_\mu$ is the gauge connection. From this gauge fixing condition the remaining gauge degree of ...
1
vote
1answer
31 views

How to divide areas in electric field lines based on field strength?

A negative charge is surrounded by four positive charges. They are all of the same strength. The electric field lines are plotted below. I am looking for the property of the drawn 'red lines' that ...
3
votes
1answer
92 views

Is the Dirac equation equivalent to the Klein-Gordon equation for its left handed component?

The Dirac equation $$(i\gamma^a\partial_a - m)\psi=0\tag{0}$$ is given by a first order operator acting on a Dirac spinor, which is the direct sum of a left handed spinor and a right handed spinor. ...
5
votes
1answer
96 views

What canonical momenta are the “right” ones?

I'm doing some classical field theory exercises with the Lagrangian $$\mathscr{L} = -\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu \nu}F^{\mu \nu}$$ where $F_{\mu \nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu$. To find the ...
0
votes
3answers
82 views

How many fields that we know of permiate the universe?

The Higgs field, as I understand it reading layman's articles, permeated the entire universe only a fraction of a second after the big bang. Are there any other fields that they know about or ...
2
votes
3answers
125 views

General relativity without curvature?

Is there a reformulation of general relativity without curved space time, just with fields (like classical E&M)? Edit: removed the part about E&M with curvature (multiple posts).
0
votes
1answer
70 views

In field theory, why are some symmetry transformations applied to the field values while other act on the space that the fields are defined on?

My basic understanding is that a field theory consists of symmetry groups, a space $S$ that the symmetry groups act on and of fields defined on that space $S$. In other words, the space $S$ is the ...
2
votes
5answers
453 views

Euclidean geometry in non-inertial frame

Refer, "The classical theory of Fields" by Landau lifshitz (Chap 3). Consider a disk of radius R, then circumference is $2 \pi R$. Now, make this disk rotate at velocity of the order of c(speed of ...
1
vote
2answers
89 views

Why Kink can not tunnel to vacuum, and is topologically stable?

Why the kink $$\phi(x)=v\tanh(\frac{x}{\xi}) ,$$ can not tunnel into vacuum $+v$ or $-v$ (Spontaneous symmetry breaking vacuum). From the boundary condition ($x\rightarrow \pm\infty, ...
0
votes
0answers
36 views

How can the VEV of a field be a function of spacetime?

Often in the discussion of effective action and effective potential (say, in the context of $\phi^4-$theory )the one-point function in presence of source is defined as \begin{equation} \frac{\delta ...
0
votes
1answer
25 views

How do simple two-component Fierz identities follow from a property of the Pauli matrices?

On page 51 Peskin and Schroeder are beginning to derive basic Fierz interchange relations using two-component right-handed spinors. They start by stating the trivial (but tedious) Pauli sigma identity ...
0
votes
0answers
16 views

Where do certain relations relevant to helicity eigenstates come from in Peskin and Schroeder?

On pages 46-47 of Peskin and Schroeder, equations 3.52 and 3.53 are introduced when we have picked specific values of the numerical two-component spinor $\xi$. We choose a basis of ...
3
votes
1answer
72 views

Permutation symmetry - a continuous symmetry?

From quantum mechanics it is known that permutation between identical particles does not change the Hamiltonian. Assuming that the quantum system consists of a very high number of particles such that ...
0
votes
0answers
41 views

Noether's 2nd Theorem and Local Gauge Identities

I am trying to derive the so called Gauge Identities: \begin{equation} D_\nu\frac{\delta S}{\delta\phi} = 0 \end{equation} Where $D_\nu$ is an operator involving derivatives and $\frac{\delta ...
1
vote
2answers
49 views

What does it mean to differentiate a spinor-valued field?

Peskin and Schroeder, equation 3.28, states that the Klein-Gordon equation $$(\partial^2+m^2)\psi=0 \tag{3.28}$$ is a valid choice of equation for a Dirac spinor field. Their explanation makes sense ...
4
votes
1answer
54 views

Is local chiral symmetry qualitatively the same as gauge symmetries?

I am confused by the role that local chiral symmetry plays in chiral perturbation theory. For the case of chiral QCD with three quark flavors, the Lagrangian is invariant under global ...
3
votes
0answers
59 views

Why does Landau theory not fail when dealing with a first order phase transition?

Here is a problem where I can do the calculation, but I am not understanding the philosophy behind it. It is about Landau theory: The Landau theory of phase transitions is based on the idea that the ...
3
votes
2answers
57 views

Determination of the ground state of a field theory

Consider the Spontaneous symmetry breaking in the theory $$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu\phi\partial^\mu\phi-\frac{\mu^2}{2}\phi^2+\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4.$$ By the ground state of a ...
0
votes
3answers
79 views

Can the sign of metric change physics?

Consider the Lagrangian of a massless real scalar (classical field) in $\phi(\textbf{x},t)$: $$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}\partial^\mu\phi\partial_\mu\phi$$ The Hamiltonian density in two different ...
0
votes
0answers
19 views

Scalar gravity coupled to matter

I am reading Ortin's Gravity and Strings and trying to understand the generalisation of Newtonian Gravity to a relativistic field theory. On page 47 (link above) he motivates the study of the Poisson ...
0
votes
1answer
67 views

Finding the action of a discretized Lagrangian

I am trying to find the action associated with the Lagrangian density $$ \mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{\partial\phi}{\partial x} \right)^2 + \frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2. \tag{1} $$ I am supposed to ...
0
votes
1answer
66 views

Regarding the Weyl spinor and its transformation properties

I am trying to prove the Lorentz invariance of the (left-handed) Weyl Lagrangian: $$\mathcal L=i\psi^\dagger\bar\sigma^\mu\partial_\mu\psi$$ A Lorentz transformation is realized as $\psi\to M\psi$, ...
3
votes
2answers
82 views

Noether's theorem: meaning of transformation of coordinates

I have a question regarding Noether's theorem. In our introductory QFT class (which is based on the book by Michele Maggiore) we have derived the Noether currents in the same form as displayed in this ...
1
vote
1answer
64 views

Is EM interpreted in a principal or vector bundle?

I've read in a few places that EM is a $U(1)$-principal bundle; but is this correct? Isn't it rather an associated vector bundle using the adjoint representation of $U(1)$?
4
votes
3answers
207 views

Energy-Momentum Tensor for Electromagnetism in Curved Space

$\newcommand{\l}{\mathcal L} \newcommand{\g}{\sqrt{-g}}$$\newcommand{\fdv}[2]{\frac{\delta #1}{\delta #2}}$I want to calculate the energy-momentum tensor in curved free space by functional ...
0
votes
0answers
77 views

Lagrangians densities & interactions in field theory

To avoid ambiguity, this question pertains to the construction of Lagrangian densities (including interaction terms) in terms of their values at single points in spacetime. In classical mechanics in ...
0
votes
2answers
94 views

How does Lorentz invariance make $(\Psi_0,J_{\mu}\Psi_0)$ vanish?

Right before equation (10.4.7) in Weinberg's volume 1 on quantum field theory, he said $(\Psi_0,J_{\mu}\Psi_0)$ vanishes due to requirement of Lorentz invariance. As I understand, this term is a ...
0
votes
0answers
26 views

How does the idea of a scalar potential for a 3-vector field generalize to Minkowski space?

How does the idea of a scalar potential for a 3-vector field generalize to Minkowski space? As I guess, I thought one way would be to generalize 3-force to 4-force and replace the 3-gradient with the ...
0
votes
0answers
25 views

Beyond the third time derivative [duplicate]

Why do texts on classical mechanics never mention any derivative of position beyond the jerk, while at the same time being general in the sense of using of generalized coordinates?
0
votes
2answers
80 views

Does a field have any physical meaning or significance? [duplicate]

Is the concept of a field just a mathematical construct? Is there any way to realize its existence? For instance, the fact that moving a charge affects other charges in the surrounding not ...
1
vote
1answer
37 views

Do different fields interact with each other directly?

There are many different types of fields such as electron field, magnetic field, higgs field, electric field, quarks field etc, my question is do these fields interact directly with each other? ...
0
votes
1answer
94 views

Problem to find field equations with Euler-Lagrange in field theory [closed]

I have the Euler-Lagrange equations, as stated in field-theory: $$\partial_\nu \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\nu \phi_\rho)}\right) - \frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi_\rho}=0$$ However ...
1
vote
1answer
87 views

Should the (On-shell) (2+1)d $N=2$ Chiral Multiplet Contain Two Scalars and Two Majorana Spinors?

In supermultiplets, the bosonic degrees of freedom and the fermionic degrees of freedom need to match in number. The number of degrees of freedom of a field corresponds to the number of independent ...
0
votes
0answers
25 views

Mass spectrum of field theory

How can I find the mass spectrum of a field theory given a Lagrangian made of a canonical kinetic term and a potential. I mean, I think I have to find the matrix of the quadratical terms in all the ...
2
votes
1answer
99 views

Doubts with basic renormalization

When we renormalize to obtain the physical mass, the $\Lambda$ dependence of the physical mass is removed by introducing the counterterms in the Lagrangian. So whether we put ...
0
votes
0answers
28 views

Mean-field solution of Potts model

The mean-field equation for the three-state Potts model $H= -J∑δσiδσj$ can be derived as follows using this: a) show that $H$ is equivalent to $-J∑Si.Sj$ where, $Si=(1 0) , (-1/2 √3/2 ) , (-1/2 ...
2
votes
2answers
59 views

Why is the introduction of a quantization volume necessary for quantization of the EM field

I have been working through the quantization of the electromagnetic field, and every source I find introduces a quantization volume with periodic boundary conditions in the process, in which we fit ...
0
votes
1answer
69 views

How do you take the derivative with respect to a rank two tensor?

I am learning classical field theory and am trying to find the momentum density of the electromagnetic lagrangian as part of an example of Noether's Theorem. The derivative I am encountering is: $$ ...
0
votes
1answer
44 views

What is the difference between the momentum in the Fourier transform of a scalar field and the conjugate momentum of the field?

What is the difference between the momentum $p$ in $\exp(ipx)$ in the Fourier transform of a scalar field and the corresponding conjugate momenta $\pi(x)$ of the scalar field?
1
vote
1answer
41 views

As the magnetic field propagates does it have a momentum that can be felt by another magnetic field of the same charge?

If I have a solenoid and a permanent magnet, and I placed the magnet an inch away from the solenoid, oriented in a position where the magnet would be repelled as the solenoid is turned on. Is it a ...
0
votes
2answers
42 views

Field theory for a finite temperature normal fluid

Can normal-fluid (not superfluid) hydrodynamics be derived from some classical field theory? Here I mean conservation (continuity) equations for mass (density), momentum, and energy (entropy, ...
1
vote
0answers
54 views

Noether Current and Feynman Diagrams

My question is simple. Assume that there is no anomaly and we have found from the lagrangian that there is a conserved current. I want to know what this means in terms of feynman diagrams, not in ...
2
votes
1answer
65 views

If time-like paths are geodesics, what physical principle applies to space-like intervals?

If I have a number of particles interacting with one another locally, then the center of mass of the system moves along a geodesic. Taking this further with the particles interacting via an EM field, ...
4
votes
0answers
70 views

Renormalization of Auxiliary Fields

I have the following non-linear sigma model (the base space $\mathcal{M}$ is Euclidean): $$ \mathcal{L}=\dfrac{1}{2\alpha}\int_{\mathcal{M}}\mathrm{d}^2\sigma\ \partial^2X^{\mu}\partial^2X_{\mu} $$ ...
0
votes
1answer
25 views

Meaning of these terms for stress fields?

I'm from a math & comp sci background and I'm currently looking at facture theory which deals with stress fields. Can someone explain to me what the following terms represent in the context of a ...
2
votes
2answers
94 views

Why don't we take this term $D_{\mu}D_{\nu}F^{\mu\nu}$ in Lagrangians?

Why don't we take $$D_{\mu}D_{\nu}F^{\mu\nu}$$ in Lagrangians?
0
votes
1answer
45 views

quantum fluctuations and the virtual particles

In the introduction of chapter-12 of “An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory” by Peskin and Schroeder I encountered this line: “The quantum fluctuatuations at arbitrarily short distances appear in ...
2
votes
1answer
58 views

Poincare non-invariance in real world and field theory

This may be a very blunt question but I wonder why we always use Poincare invariant Lagrangians in field theory. After all, the entire world around us is by no means homogeneous, isotropic and so on. ...