The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

6
votes
0answers
175 views

Deriving Feynman rules from Renormalized Lagrangian

In the context of Renormalized Pertubation Theory Peskin Schröder says: The Lagrangian $$ \mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2} (\partial_\mu\phi_r)^2-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi_r^2-\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi_r^4 + \frac{1}{2} ...
6
votes
0answers
309 views

gauge invariance of the Feynman amplitudes

When we calculate the photon polarization sums over amplitudes, $$X=\sum\limits_{r=1}^{2}|\mathcal M_r|^2=\mathcal M_\alpha\mathcal M_\beta^*\sum\limits_{r=1}^{2}\epsilon_r^\alpha\epsilon_r^\beta$$ ...
6
votes
0answers
611 views

If Renormalization Scale is Arbitrary, Why Do We Care about Running Couplings?

For the bounty please verify the following reasoning [copied from comment below] Ah right, so the idea is that overall observable quantities must be independent of the renormalization scale. But at ...
6
votes
0answers
308 views

An use of the Schwinger-Dyson equation

I was confused as to how the equation 10 on page 7 or equation 21 on page 8 of this paper http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.1866 was derived. Can someone explain from where does this come and what do the ...
5
votes
0answers
152 views

Functional integral aproach for Feynman rules

I am familiar with the basic ideas of quantum field theory but I feel uncomfortable when I have to derive Feynman rules by myself for a given action (for example in non-linear sigma models or ...
5
votes
0answers
156 views

Understanding the intermediate field method for the $\phi^4$ interaction

In Rivasseau's and Wang's How to Resum Feynman Graphs, on page 11 they illustrate the intermediate field method for the $\phi^4$ interaction and represent Feynman graphs as ribbon graphs. I had to ...
4
votes
0answers
78 views

Feynman rules for coupled systems

I have the following system of two coupled real scalar fields $\sigma$ and $\phi$: ...
4
votes
0answers
191 views

Why do we use functional integration in QFT?

Recently I learned functional integral's formalism in quantum field theory. I have realized that I don't understand why exactly do we introduce it. We have the expression for $S$-matrix, then we may ...
4
votes
0answers
114 views

Can $\langle\Omega|f|\Omega \rangle$ always be reduced to $\langle0|f|0\rangle$?

I've not come across any expression involving $\langle\Omega|f|\Omega\rangle$ in Srednicki's QFT book (please correct me if these exist there). On the other hand, they are abound in Chapter 7 of ...
4
votes
0answers
64 views

Helicity dependence in loop diagrams

I am trying to evaluate a diagram that looks like The middle of the diagram is a fermion loop. I know that the coupling between the $Z^0$ and fermions depends on the fermions' helicities, so it ...
3
votes
0answers
81 views

Contradictory result for scalar-field propagator from Feynman rules and LSZ formula

I am trying to learn how to calculate scattering amplitudes in a Klein-Gordon theory. I am getting stuck with the simplest of the examples: $\phi\to\phi$ in a free scalar-field theory. Let's say that ...
3
votes
0answers
244 views

How to count and 'see' the symmetry factor of Feynman diagrams?

Could somebody explain how one can derive the symmetry factor both by counting possible contractions and by looking at the symmetry of a diagram. Consider for example this diagram in $\phi^4$-theory ...
3
votes
0answers
115 views

Variations of S-matrix functional and Feynman diagrams in Weinberg QFT

Weinberg on p. 287 of his QFT vol. 1 introduces the extended interaction operator: $$ \tag 1 \hat{V}(t) \to \hat{V}(t) + \sum_{a}\int d^{3}\mathbf x \hat{o}_{a}(\mathbf x ,t)\varepsilon_{a}(x). $$ ...
3
votes
0answers
89 views

What is the phase space for outgoing photons?

For a scattering process for which $n$ fermions are scattered, (by some conventions) the cross section acquires a phase space factor of: $$d\sigma \sim \prod_{i=1}^n\frac{d^3p_i}{(2\pi)^3 2E_i}$$ ...
3
votes
0answers
94 views

Symmetry factor of tree diagram

In Mark Srednicki's Quantum field theory(page 89) it says This is a general result for tree diagrams (those with no closed loops): once the sources have been stripped off and the endpoints ...
3
votes
0answers
96 views

Feynman Toy Model Constraints on Number of Each Kind of External Lines

(From my homework) In our toy model we have three kinds of spinless particles: $A$, $B$, and $C$. The primitive vertex of decay/interaction is shown below: My actual problem statement says: ...
3
votes
0answers
139 views

Vertex for quartic interaction of complex scalar multiplet

Since I'm new to QFT and I tend to do a lot of errors during calculations, I would like you to tell me if I got the four-point vertex of the quartic interaction with a multiplet of complex scalar ...
3
votes
0answers
49 views

Scattering theory on Schrodinger and Feynman languages

Recently I heard that both of "languages" of scattering theory (formal solution by method of classical scattering theory and its reworking by Feynman with his rules) predict virtual particles. But for ...
2
votes
0answers
70 views

$\phi^4$ theory two-loop contributions

Wherever I see calculations of two-loop contributions to the $\phi^4$ propagator (such as Peskin, page 328, on the bottom), only the sunset diagram (aka the Saturn diagram) is considered, but not, ...
2
votes
0answers
64 views

Why do tadpoles contribute to amplitudes?

In some quantum field theories tadpoles of the form                         ...
2
votes
0answers
149 views

Perturbation theory : quadratic external field

I'm trying to derive the explicit form of S-matrix of an interaction Hamiltonian $$H' = \frac{1}{2} \lambda \left[ \int d^3 x \rho({\vec x}) \phi({\vec x}, t)\right]^2\tag{1}$$ Even though the ...
2
votes
0answers
59 views

Off-shell legs in Feynman diagrams

I have a tree-level diagram with one leg being off-shell (its momentum beeing $\mathcal{O}(m_B)$). How do I treat this leg when computing the amplitude? Do I put in the propagator and ignore the ...
2
votes
0answers
139 views

Feynman propagator with general $\xi$ parameter

Hey from my notes in my PS book it seems I have solved this some time in the past, but I cannot seem to get the indices straight this time around. So in deriving the Feynman photon-propagator which ...
2
votes
0answers
68 views

The Ward identity for EM amplitude with massive vector boson

Let's have theory of massive vector boson interacting with EM field: $$ L = |D_{\mu}W_{\nu} - D_{\nu}W_{\mu}|^{2} + m^{2}|W|^{2}, \quad D_{\mu} = \partial_{\mu} - ieA_{\mu}. $$ The question: how to ...
2
votes
0answers
76 views

S-Matrix Generating Functional (Problem 4.1 in Weinberg)

I'm currently working through Weinberg's QFT book, but I'm somewhat stuck at problem 4.1, which states: Define generating functionals for the S-matrix and its connected part: \begin{equation} ...
2
votes
0answers
124 views

Feynman rules of a theory in non-standard form

I am currently studying lecture notes by Akhmedov on interacting scalar field theory in de Sitter space. In these notes, he considers a scalar field theory of the form ...
2
votes
0answers
83 views

Approximation of skeleton diagrams

I'm studying the diagrammatics for a Bose system (in the superfluid phase) developed by Gavoret and Nozieres (Annals of Physics 28 349 (1964)). In this paper, they show how to solve the problem using ...
2
votes
0answers
145 views

Møller scattering: twisted?

I am studying the Møller scattering, but I don't know how to get the twisted diagram from the S-matrix. Has anybody a good explanation?
2
votes
0answers
81 views

Chirality when moving around legs in Feynman diagrams

Assuming one has the following term in a Lagrangian: $$ g (\overline{A_R} B_L)(\overline{C_R}D_L) $$ where A,B,C,D correspond to spin 1/2 Dirac particles and the subscripts $R$ and $L$ denote left- ...
1
vote
0answers
21 views

Is there a useful way to represent the optical theorem in the parametric representation?

The usual way to represent the optical theorem for Feynman diagrams is through the Cutkosky rules. The proof of these rules works by considering the momentum representation and performing the iterated ...
1
vote
0answers
51 views

How do the renormalization enter the actual amplitude calculation in QFT?

I have studied QFT from Peskin and Schroeder and from a few other books and lectures and I think I understand the procedure of renormalizing various parameters in the Lagrangian like mass, coupling ...
1
vote
0answers
46 views

Clarification on Use of Counterterms in Renormalized Perturbation Theory

In renormalized perturbation theory, it's unclear to me how exactly we add the necessary counter-terms. Do we: Draw all possible diagrams, including the diagrams of the counter-terms to some order ...
1
vote
0answers
32 views

Fermion - Antifermion (annihilation) scattering amplitude

I'm trying to get the scattering of the diagrams described here in the "annihilation, part ii" (fermion/antifermion - scalar/scalar) ...
1
vote
0answers
73 views

If you are only interested in deriving Feynman diagrams can you skip path integrals and just compute greens functions?

I've been reading about the path integral approach to quantum field theory and I noticed that at the end you are just computing greens functions that you could have started computing in the beginning. ...
1
vote
0answers
66 views

Shifting the integration variable in loop integrals

We know that, in four dimensions, shifting the integration variables is valid only for convergent and logarithmically divergent integrals. If we employ a hard cutoff $\Lambda$, is it permissible to ...
1
vote
0answers
67 views

QFT Perturbative analysis of multiple atom-level quantum computers close to each other

Following up on this question, I'm wondering about electromagnetic interactions perturbation expansions close to a "black-box" quantum computer and modularity of Feynman diagrams in general. Let me ...
1
vote
0answers
71 views

Why only fully connected diagrams contribute to T matrix

In Peskin's introduction to QFT, he wrote: only fully connected diagrams, in which all external lines are connected to each other, contribute to the T matrix. I don't understand this ...
1
vote
0answers
91 views

Sign of Feynman rules with derivative couplings

Feynman rules for derivative couplings always make me confused. For example, the derivative in $gV^\mu\phi^+\partial_\mu\phi^-$ will give you $\pm ip_{-\mu}$, where $\pm$ depends on whether the ...
1
vote
0answers
57 views

Physical interpretation of scalar tadpole loops

In Feynman diagrams, fermionic loops are drawn like this: While scalar loops are drawn as tadpoles: I assume the difference comes from the scalar not having an anti-particle. But how should one ...
1
vote
0answers
32 views

Estimation of polarization perturbative term

I'm studying a diagrammatic approach to degenerate electron gas. Now I need to prove that the energy contribution, with an arbitrary potential, of polarization at first perturbative order given by the ...
1
vote
0answers
98 views

Two forms of Feynman Diagrams?

I am confused. I know Feynman Diagrams looks like the ones here. But then I saw these, look in page 17[1247] of this paper. Any idea?
1
vote
0answers
269 views

Field Strength Renormalisation in Peskin and Schroeder

In chapter 7 of Peskin and Schroeder they define the field strength renormalisation $Z$ for a quantum field to be the residue of the Fourier transform of the correlation function $$\langle \Omega | ...
1
vote
0answers
89 views

Exact summation of a sub-class of diagram: do we know the exact solved problem?

In quantum field theories (to be relativistic, (non-)relativistic statistical or whatever), we have the powerful diagrammatic approach at our disposal. Most of the time we can not sum up all the ...
1
vote
0answers
129 views

Feynman Diagram for Interaction of Deuteron with Oxygen-16

I have to draw a Feynman diagram for the interaction of a deuteron with Oxygen-16. The interaction is as follows: $ d + {}^{16}O \rightarrow p + {}^{17}O . $ I am generally ok with Feynman ...
0
votes
0answers
19 views

How was this one probability amplitude derived by Mattuck?

I'm reading A Guide to Feynman Diagrams in the Many-Body Problem by Richard D. Mattuck (2nd edition). You can look at the relevant pages here. On page 45, he presents a formula for $D_t c_p(t)$. ...
0
votes
0answers
41 views

Feynman Parametrization in muon magnetic moment

I am calculating the muon magnetic moment due to Electroweak interactions in one loop diagrams involving $W$ bosons. While referring a particular research article by John S. Curiale, titled Weak ...
0
votes
0answers
36 views

What do the tensors here equal to?

In the process $$e^+e^- \rightarrow \gamma \gamma$$ for which the amplitude can be written as: $M= \epsilon^*_{1\nu}\epsilon^*_{2\mu}(A^{\mu\nu}+\tilde{A}^{\mu\nu})$, where $\epsilon_i$ is the ...
0
votes
0answers
42 views

How to calculate explicitly the *external leg correction* diagram

I tried to calculate the Amplitude of the external leg correction of figure 6.1 in Peskin&Schroeder. I focus on the diagram with one incomming charged fermion $f^-$ (with momentum $p'$), then a ...
0
votes
0answers
42 views

Correction of arrow of particle direction

I have seen a stamp of Richard Feynman where Feynman hold the famous Feynman diagram. But is there any problem of the direction of arrow?
0
votes
0answers
49 views

Diagrammatics of Slavnov Taylor Identity

Is there a reference other than the original paper of 't-Hooft and Veltman, where I can get a pedagogical introduction to the diagrammatic approach to understanding the BRST-Ward or Slavnov-Taylor ...