The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

11
votes
10answers
936 views

Is quantum entanglement mediated by an interaction?

You can get two photons entangled, and send them off in different directions; this is what happens in EPR experiments. Is the entanglement then somehow affected if one puts a thick slab of EM ...
7
votes
2answers
371 views

Bells Theorem for Dummies, How does it work?

I've been reading up on theoretical physics for a few years now and I feel like I am starting to get an understanding of particle physics, at least as much as you can from Wikipedia pages. One thing ...
7
votes
1answer
445 views

Can observations of entangled particles affect their unobserved counterparts?

There are two experiments that are often used to explain Quantum Mechanics: the two-slit experiment and the EPR paradox. I am curious what would happen if you combined them. Imagine an experiment ...
4
votes
12answers
2k views

Could the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle turn out to be false?

While investigating the EPR Paradox, it seems like only two options are given, when there could be a third that is not mentioned - Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle being given up. The setup is this ...
4
votes
1answer
156 views

The choice of measurement basis on one half of an entangled state affects the other half. Can this be used to communicate faster than light?

It is often stated, particularly in popular physics articles and videos, that if one measures a particle A that is entangled with some other particle B, then this measurement will immediately affect ...
4
votes
1answer
97 views

Causality in QFT from vanishing commutator and the EPR paradox

The question relates to this post. As shown in Peskin and Schroeder's introduction to quantum field theory p. 28., $$[\phi(x),\phi(y)] = 0 \;\;\mathrm{if}\;\; (x-y)^2<0$$, which implies the ...
4
votes
1answer
352 views

Tracking down the locality assumption in a CHSH inequality derivation

CHSH inequality requires both locality and realism. I will equate here realism with counterfactual definiteness. Now counterfactual definiteness tells us that given two different measurements on the ...
3
votes
4answers
473 views

How do we show that no hidden variable theories can replace QM?

I've always hit two big stumbling blocks in conceiving of the proof or disproof of hidden variable theories as being even valid idea, let alone an answerable question... I feel I must be ...
3
votes
5answers
574 views

Trying to understand the EPR paradox

So I keep reading all these articles on the EPR paradox, and I follow them pretty easily right up until it gets to the most important matter. Assuming you are trying to measure x and y spin, ...
3
votes
2answers
57 views

Why would classical correlation in Bell's experiment be a linear function of angle?

Sorry if it's a newbie question, but I have trouble understanding the following part in the Wikipedia's explanation for the Bell's theorem: With the measurements oriented at intermediate angles ...
2
votes
4answers
223 views

Why isn't quantum entanglement just a lack of information?

From this question and answer from joshphysics, I didn't understand one thing, even after reading the comments: Why should assume that entangled electrons will only "decide" their state after ...
2
votes
1answer
150 views

What is the difference between realism in locality, and counterfactual definiteness?

I understand the EPR-experiment and the Bell inequalities. I can see how dropping 'locality' solves the issue, and how dropping 'realism' solves the issue (e.g. there are really no hidden variables ...
2
votes
1answer
73 views

Is it possible to determine the state or values of something without measuring it

To give context to this question, I am currently looking into non-locality / hidden variables / Bell's Theorem, EPR / etc. I've noticed the assertion that the values / state of something when ...
2
votes
0answers
109 views

Is the translational information all that matters, or do we need to take into account internal states?

For anyone in this community that's familiar with quantum teleportation, I need desperate help. I am currently working on my senior thesis and my goal is to teleport a molecule. Background: So in ...
1
vote
5answers
102 views

EPR paradox: instantaneous vs very fast?

An EPR quantum experiment can be explained by instantaneous collapse of the wave function regardless of the distance separating a pair of entangled particles. But do we have the certainty that the ...
1
vote
2answers
735 views

EPR-type experiments and faster-than-light communication using interference effects as signaling mechanism

I understand that faster-than-light communication is impossible when making single measurements, because the outcome of each measurement is random. However, shouldn't measurement on one side collapse ...
1
vote
1answer
74 views

Photon source for Bell test

Wiki tells us that In practice most actual experiments have used light, assumed to be emitted in the form of particle-like photons (produced by atomic cascade or spontaneous parametric down ...
1
vote
0answers
31 views

EPR Experiments and Monogamy

Normally in an EPR experiment two measurements are performed on entangled particle pair. Only the particle pair is treated quantum mechanically and it is usually prepared in a state like $$ ...
0
votes
2answers
124 views

EPR vs. EPRBB? Why can't we perform the original EPR experiment?

The EPR gedanken experiment was invented by Einstein Podolsky and Rosen in 1935. It involved positions and momenta. In 1957, Bohm revised this gedanken experiment into one involving spins, or ...
0
votes
1answer
311 views

Relativity and Entanglement

Say we have two particles which are entangled so that they have opposite spins. If one is up, the other is down. They are sent off to two spatially separated observers A and B. Both observers can ...
0
votes
0answers
21 views

Exhaustive list of assumptions for the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality

I am trying to create an exhaustive list of all assumptions which work as the base of the CHSH inequality. Locality - this means an object can be influenced only by its surroundings. So, the events ...
-1
votes
1answer
95 views

Many worlds interpretation

I think many worlds interpretation is inconsistent with the EPR paradox. Quantum mechanics says that particles are really in more places at the same time and the particle is really only probability ...