The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

0
votes
0answers
22 views

Reference request for supersymmetric localization

I would like to ask for some readable introduction or maybe review of the technique of supersymmetric localization for $\mathcal{N}=1,2$ SUSY theories. I would like a different one than the one people ...
1
vote
0answers
31 views

Diagrammatics of Slavnov Taylor Identity

Is there a reference other than the original paper of 't-Hooft and Veltman, where I can get a pedagogical introduction to the diagrammatic approach to understanding the BRST-Ward or Slavnov-Taylor ...
1
vote
1answer
32 views

Volume factor in Faddeev-Popov quantisation

In Faddeev-Popov quantisation, why does the integral over gauge parameter cancel the volume factor of the gauge group that's in the denominator? In fact, I don't understand where the volume factor ...
1
vote
1answer
104 views

Noether Current when the Lagrangian depends on second derivative of the fields

Let a Lagrangian density for a field theory of $N$ fields $\left\{\phi_i\right\}_{i=1}^N$ be given. Assume that the Lagrangian density depends on the fields, their spacetime derivatives, and their ...
2
votes
0answers
76 views

BRST quantization of point particle

Suppose we have Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ with basis $t_a$ with a representation $$ t_a \mapsto K_a: V \to V. $$ Denote by $c^a$ the dual basis. Chevalley differential is defined as $$ Q = c^i K_i - ...
5
votes
0answers
132 views

What is the fundamental difference between ghost and auxiliary fields?

I am somehow confused by the notion of auxiliary fields, such as for example the fields $F$ and $D$ which appear in supersymmetry, and the notion of ghost fields which appear for example in the BRST ...
8
votes
2answers
530 views

Why do Faddeev-Popov ghosts decouple in BRST?

Why do Faddeev-Popov ghosts decouple in BRST? What is the physical reason behind it? Not just the mathematical reason. If BRST quantization is specifically engineered to make the ghosts decouple, how ...
8
votes
1answer
136 views

Relation between cohomology and the BRST operator

Given a manifold $M$, we may define the $p$th de Rham cohomology group $H^p(M)$ as the quotient, $$C^p(M) \, / \, Z^p(M)$$ where $C^p$ and $Z^p$ are the groups of closed and exact $p$-forms ...
1
vote
1answer
240 views

Why this integral is equal to zero?

Recently I have read that for gauge-invariant functional (under transformations of some $SU(n)$ group) $R(A) = R(F_{\mu \nu}^{a})$ contains only gauge field $A_{\mu}^{a}$ satisfies the identity $$ ...
3
votes
0answers
85 views

Polchinski equation 4.3.16

I am trying to obtain the polchinski's equation 4.3.16 which is following $ Q_B^2 = \frac{1}{2}\{ Q_B, Q_B \} = -\frac{1}{2}g^{K}_{IJ}g^{M}_{KL}c^Ic^Jc^L b_M =0$ Where $ Q_B = C^I(G_I^m ...
2
votes
1answer
191 views

Lagrangian depends on second derivative of field

In case of the gauge-fixed Faddeev-Popov Lagrangian: $$ \mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}\,^{a}F^{\mu\nu ...
9
votes
0answers
313 views

Noether currents for the BRST tranformation of Yang-Mills fields

The Lagrangian of the Yang-Mills fields is given by $$ \mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{4}(F^a_{\mu\nu})^2+\bar{\psi}(i\gamma^{\mu} D_{\mu}-m)\psi-\frac{1}{2\xi}(\partial\cdot A^a)^2+ ...
3
votes
1answer
94 views

Yang-Mills Lagrangian invariant under BRST

In equation 16.47 in Peskin & Schroeder, it is claimed that $$ -\frac{1}{2}g^2f^{abc}f^{cde}\left(A_{\mu}\,^{b}c^{d}c^{e}+A_{\mu}\,^{d}c^{e}c^{b}+A_{\mu}\,^{e}c^{b}c^{d}\right) ~=~ 0 \tag{16.47}$$ ...
3
votes
0answers
48 views

Old covariant quantization of open string at level N=1

I have a question regarding an equation in Polchinski's "String Theory, Volume 1, An introduction to the bosonic string". The equation is (4.3.27) on p.135. This section is about the brst-cohomology ...
5
votes
1answer
105 views

Does the LSZ reduction method prove gauge-independence in massless gauge theories?

I've been working my way through L. Baulieu's excellent paper [Perturbative gauge theories, Physics Reports, Volume 129, Issue 1, December 1985, Pages 1-74]. Towards the end, he goes on to prove that ...
4
votes
1answer
239 views

The BRST construction for YM with or without auxiliary field

I'm learning BRST symmetry for Yang-Mills theory and I see that there are two ways of writing BRST differential. In some books (for example Ryder's and Ramond's textbooks) BRST differential acts as ...
2
votes
1answer
173 views

Adding stuff to the path integral (Faddeev-Popov method)

I'm wondering about the Faddeev-Popov method described in Peskin Schroeder and also on page 7 in this link. What gives them the right to simply add the Gaussian $\omega$ and thus introduce the $\xi$ ...
2
votes
0answers
46 views

A question about the constraints in BRST-Fock theories

In BRST Symmetry in the Classical and Quantum Theories of Gauge Systems, Henneaux says the Fock representation is not applicable to an odd number of constraints. Then he goes on to say that the ...
6
votes
1answer
210 views

Gupta-Bleuler Formalism

In the Gupta-Bleuler formalism we have a problem with two states (scalar photons and longitudinal photons), because here $\langle \vec{k}_a|\vec{k}_b\rangle $ is negative or zero. However, I thought ...
2
votes
1answer
163 views

Ghost fields in particle physics

In my particle physics lecture, ghost fields were briefly mentioned. As far as I understand, these come up when computing cross sections by the path integral method, to compensate for equivalent ...
10
votes
2answers
237 views

For the $U(1)$ problem, is the Kugo and Ojima Goldstone quartet wrong?

On page 96 in "Local Covariant Operator Formalism of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories and Quark Confinement Problem", Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 66 (1979) 1, KO state the following: Finally we should ...
1
vote
1answer
131 views

Lorenz gauge in the Gupta-Bleuler Method

Greiner in his book Field Quantization page 180 & 181 wrote: As shown in (7.24) the Lorenz condition cannot be enforced as an operator identity. Instead we will use it as a condition for the ...
1
vote
1answer
69 views

Ghosts on Torus worldsheet

Why after the expansion, only 0-mode of bc-ghost contributes to the 4-points ghost function on a torus worldsheet? $$<c(z_1)b(z_2)\tilde{c}(\bar{z}_3)\tilde{b}(\bar{z}_4)>_{T^2} ...
3
votes
3answers
169 views

Is BRST ghost number conserved in quantum gravity?

Quantum gravity needs Faddeev-Popov ghosts. Feynman showed that. Take a black hole. Hawking pair production of ghost-antighost pair. One ghost falls into the hole and hits the singularity. The ghost ...
3
votes
1answer
155 views

Ghost Number Conservation

I've been reading about gauge theory quantization, and understand it mostly. The only thing I don't get is why people talk about "ghost number conservation". As far as I can tell, the ghost number is ...
7
votes
0answers
156 views

The Integral Trick and An Equality in Nakajima's Lecture

In Nekrasov et al's series papers MNS, they calculate such kinds of integral $$ \frac{E_1 E_2}{N(2\pi i)^N(E_1+E_2) }\oint d\phi_1 \wedge d\phi_2\wedge \ldots\wedge d\phi_N \prod_{i<N} (-\phi_i) ...
4
votes
1answer
191 views

Conservation of BRST current in QED

I am trying to understand the conservation of the BRST current in QED but am having some trouble. This is what I have so far, QED lagrangian density in Lorenz gauge is, $$L = ...
4
votes
1answer
150 views

A question about BRST current in bosonic string theory

I have a question about Eq. (4.3.3) in Polchinski's string theory book volume I, p. 131. It is said Replacing the $X^{\mu}$ with a general matter CFT, the BRST transformation of the matter fields ...
1
vote
1answer
78 views

A question of BRST symmetry of bosonic string theory

This question relates to this post I tried to verify Eq. (4.2.7) in Polchinski's string theory book vol I p. 127 but I miserably miss a sign $$ \delta_B (b_A F^A) = i \epsilon (S_2 + S_3) ...
2
votes
1answer
115 views

How do I show the existence of a conserved ghost number with BRST in bosonic string theory?

I have three questions about the BRST symmetry in Polchinski's string theory vol I p. 126-127, which happen together Given a path integral $$ \int [ d\phi_i dB_A db_A d c^{\alpha}] ...
4
votes
2answers
146 views

BRST transformation of adjoint spinor

in Yang-Mills-Theory with matter fields a dirac spinor $\psi$ transforms under BRST as $$\psi \to \delta_\Omega\psi=i\eta\psi $$ with $\eta$ being a ghost field. If I want to get the transformation of ...
5
votes
1answer
373 views

How to get the $i\epsilon$ prescription for a Faddeev-Popov ghost propagator?

In path integral formalism, for a physical field there will be an $i\epsilon$ term in the action, which comes from identifying the in and out vacuum, and in turn this $i\epsilon$ will naturally appear ...
5
votes
1answer
185 views

Quantum master equation in the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism

I am reading the Section 15.9 of Weinberg's book "The Quantum Theory of Fields, vol. 2". Under a shift $\delta\Psi[\chi]$ in $\Psi[\chi]$, we have $$ \begin{split} \delta ...
3
votes
2answers
493 views

What is the ontological status of Faddeev Popov ghosts?

We all know Faddeev-Popov ghosts are needed in manifestly Lorentz covariant nonabelian quantum gauge theories. We also all know they decouple from the rest of matter asymptotically, although they ...
10
votes
2answers
440 views

Virasoro constraints in quantization of the Polyakov action

The generators of the Virasoro algebra (actually two copies thereof) appear as constraints in the classical theory of the Polyakov action (after gauge fixing). However, when quantizing only "half" of ...
9
votes
2answers
291 views

Is ghost-number a physical reality/observable?

One perspective is to say that one introduced the ghost fields into the Lagrangian to be able to write the gauge transformation determinant as a path-integral. Hence I was tempted to think of them as ...
4
votes
1answer
119 views

Negative open string norms after BRST cohomology?

The question Disappearance of moduli for condensate of open strings made me think. Suppose we have a Dp-brane completely wrapped over a $T^d$ compactification with $p\leqslant d$. Look at an open ...
5
votes
2answers
339 views

Kugo and Ojima's Canonical Formulation of Yang-Mills using BRST

I am trying to study the canonical formulation of Yang-Mills theories so that I have direct access to the $n$-particle of the theory (i.e. the Hilbert Space). To that end, I am following Kugo and ...
2
votes
3answers
190 views

Quantizing first-class constraints for open algebras: can Hermiticity and noncommutativity coexist?

An open algebra for a collection of first-class constraints, $G_a$, $a=1,\cdots, r$, is given by the Poisson bracket $\{ G_a, G_b \} = {f_{ab}}^c[\phi] G_c$ classically, where the structure constants ...
8
votes
1answer
432 views

Clarification on “central charge equals number of degrees of freedom”

It's often stated that the central charge c of a CFT counts the degrees of freedom: it adds up when stacking different fields, decreases as you integrate out UV dof from one fixed point to another, ...
7
votes
1answer
149 views

Request for Reference: BRST formalism/transformations

Could anyone please suggest a very basic paper/reference/literature on BRST symmetry/formalism that requires rudimentary knowledge of Dirac's method for dealing with constrained systems and generation ...
8
votes
1answer
230 views

Who added $\frac{3}{2} \partial^2 c$ to the virasoro BRST current (and why)?

I've been looking at the literature on quantizing the bosonic string, and I noticed that there was a change made in the definition of the BRST current around 1992. However, I haven't found any ...