Tagged Questions
3
votes
2answers
125 views
Could we get rid of explicit fields derivatives in Quantum Field Theories?
For instance, if we choose the following scalar field Lagrangian, which is (I hope) Lorentz-invariant, where $l$ is a a length scale, and with a $(-1,1,1,1)$ metric:
$$ \mathfrak{L}(x) \sim ...
4
votes
2answers
264 views
Gauge fixing and equations of motion
Consider an action that is gauge invariant. Do we obtain the same information from the following:
Find the equations of motion, and then fix the gauge?
Fix the gauge in the action, and then find the ...
1
vote
1answer
114 views
What do I call the inverse of a propagator?
Let's suppose I have a theory described by a Lagrangian as follows:
$ \mathcal{L} = A_\mu \underbrace{\left( \partial^2 g^{\mu\nu} - \partial^\mu \partial^\nu + m^2 g^{\mu \nu} \right)}_{K^{\mu \nu}} ...
3
votes
3answers
289 views
Calculating lagrangian density from first principle
In most of the field theory text they will start with lagrangian density for spin 1 and spin 1/2 particles. But i could find any text where this lagrangian density is derived from first principle.
2
votes
1answer
148 views
Differentiation of the action functional
In the QFT book by Itzykson and Zuber, the variation of the action functional $I=\int_{t_1}^{t_2}dtL$ is written as:
$$\delta I=\int_{t_1}^{t_2}dt\frac{\delta I}{\delta q(t)}\delta q(t)$$
How is ...
7
votes
1answer
176 views
To construct an action from a given two-point function
This is really a basic question whose answer I guess may have to do with the way we construct Feynman rules and diagrams. The question is: Suppose I have been given a two-point function (found in some ...
