Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there a way or sense in which one can Bosonize this kind of a Lagrangian,

$L = \bar{\psi}\gamma^\mu \partial _\mu \psi + f(x) \bar{\psi}\psi$

for $f(x)$ being some function on space-time.

  • What is the most pedagogic reference which explains the Thirring Model/Sine-Gordon bosonization from scratch?
share|cite|improve this question

Try the lecture Classical Lumps and their Quantum Descendants (Lecture 6) from Sidney Coleman's Aspects of Symmetry - Selected Erice Lectures (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 185-264. I can think of no better place, since not only is Coleman a great expositor, but he also was the one who discovered this stuff.

share|cite|improve this answer
Does it deal with the example that I was talking of? (..I have tried reading one of Coleman's original papers and it was very hard to read - he used a lot of previous results from some Klaiber - and it became a mess...) – user6818 Feb 20 '14 at 5:37
Sorry, I should have said that my answer refers to your second question (i.e. the Thirring / sine-Gordon bosonization). As for your first question, one must have in mind that bosonization of fermion fields only works in 1+1 dimensions (this is missing from your question). That being said, it doesn't look much different from bosonization of free fermion fields, although your model may get messy depending on the form of $f$. Do you have a specific $f$ in mind? – Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro Feb 20 '14 at 6:49
Can you explain as to how do you think the 1+1 bosonization will work with that $f$? It seems you think it will! (...also it seems that Bosonization of these theories makes sense for higher-dimensions also - ) – user6818 Feb 21 '14 at 2:24
Your model is still free in the sense that the field equations are linear, but you no longer have a translation invariant vacuum state if $f$ is not constant. Nevertheless, you still have quasi-free reference states (i.e. such that all truncated $n$-point functions vanish for $n>2$) whose 2-point function have a short distance behavior similar to that of a vacuum state (the so-called Hadamard states). If one works with one of these states, the bosonization procedure shouldn't be that different from the standard one applied to Dirac fields in 1+1 dimensions. – Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro Feb 21 '14 at 21:27
Bosonization of Dirac (free) fields in 1+1 dimensions, on its turn, can be found in books on string theory such as Green-Schwarz-Witten or Polchinski. – Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro Feb 21 '14 at 21:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.