Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The eigenfunctions of a Hermitian operator are real. But consider a function $\psi(x)=e^{-\kappa x}$, $x\in\mathbb{R}$, where $\kappa$ is a real constant. Then, $$\hat p \psi(x)=-i\hbar \frac{d}{dx}e^{-\kappa x}=i\kappa \hbar \psi(x).$$ This gives a pure imaginary eigenvalue. Is it not a contradiction? Or am I missing some crucial point?

share|cite|improve this question
Interesting question. Just pointing out the eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator are real, not the eigenfunctions. – JeffDror Feb 12 '14 at 13:48
this function is unphysical – Danu Feb 12 '14 at 14:06
Unphysical doesn't mean that it is mathematically impossible. I believe that the right answer lies on the rigged hilbert space associated is $L^2(\mathbb{R})$, i have to check but I think that $\psi(x)=e^{-\kappa x}$ with real $\kappa$ don't lie there. Anyway, you don't need eigenvectors to define eigenvalues, and the spectral theorem, in this case, rules out non-real eigenvalues – Hydro Guy Jun 6 '14 at 18:39
up vote 10 down vote accepted

What is your Hilbert space? In $L^2(\mathbb R)$ your eigenfunction would have infinite norm. If you dealt instead with a bounded set $L^2([a,b])$, your operator would not be Hermitian unless you impose suitable boundary conditions to discard boundary terms. These boundary conditions, however, would rule out your candidate eigenvector!

share|cite|improve this answer
Okay. I was guessing that while specifying an operator we must also specify its domain. Is that right? – SRS Feb 12 '14 at 14:08
Yes you must also specify the Hilbert space and the domain therein! – Valter Moretti Feb 12 '14 at 14:10
V. Moretti-But even $e^{ikx}$ is not a member of $L^2(-\infty,\infty)$. But this gives real eigenvalue for the same operator. Therefore, what I understood from your answer is that unless the domain is specified it is not guaranteed that the eigenvalues of the hermitian operator are real, it could be be anything, real or imaginary. – SRS Feb 12 '14 at 14:21
(I rewrite, since it was unclear as I sent it from my mobile phone). Yes, $e^{ikx}$ is a generalized eigenvector like $\delta(x)$ for the position operator...For self-adjoint operators, reality condition holds for generalized eigenvectors, too, but it is more technical to prove. – Valter Moretti Feb 12 '14 at 18:57

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.