Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm a little unclear as to how QFT differs from Elementary particle physics. They both use pictorials of Feynman graphs, is it that Elementary particle physics assumes the point particle perspective, while QFT treats them as fields?

share|cite|improve this question
Concerning this answer to another question. You appear to have duplicate accounts. There is a help center page about that. – dmckee Feb 10 '14 at 13:23
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Quantum Field Theory is the framework that we normally use to study particle physics. It is the idea that the world is described by fields and each field can move into excited states which correspond to particles.

Since we are working with fields, you not constricted to a fixed particle number as in Quantum Mechanics. This is very useful since due to $E=mc^2$, particles constantly appear and disappear in the real world.

Particle physics on the other hand, is the study of the particles that make up our world. Since QFT's are terrific at describing Nature, we use them to describe particle physics; they are tool we need to study particle physics. However, some people study QFT for the sake of QFT since its a very deep and subtle subject.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.