Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm an undergraduate interested in theory. I recently asked one of my professors, a physicist in the particle theory group at my school, if he'd be willing to take on an undergraduate for a senior project. He told me to check back in at the end of the quarter, and that he might have a project related to super-symmetric quantum mechanics and integrable systems that may be feasible for me to try out then.

In the meantime, I want to familiarize myself as much as possible with the relevant math and physics so that I can impress him when I ask again. Do any of you have any books/online sources that you recommend I take a look at?

share|cite|improve this question

Before answering, please see our policy on resource recommendation questions. Please write substantial answers that detail the style, content, and prerequisites of the book, paper or other resource. Explain the nature of the resource so that readers can decide which one is best suited for them rather than relying on the opinions of others. Answers containing only a reference to a book or paper will be removed!

    
Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/26912 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/30353 and links therein. – Qmechanic Feb 7 '14 at 0:10
2  
see also the answer at physicsoverflow.org/16267 – Arnold Neumaier Nov 29 '14 at 8:45
up vote 3 down vote accepted

regarding supersymmetric quantum mechanics:

By all means you should read and absorb the source of all supersymmetric quantum mechanics, which is still probably the deepest article on this topic, namely the original

This is one fourth of the work that won Witten the Fields medal in 1990.

When I learned this stuff back then, I was very much enchanted by the perspective of spectral geometry (i.e. Connes' spectral triples) that is highlighted in the survey

I'd say if you read that in parallel with Witten, you'll end up with a rather profound understanding of what the deep aspects here are. Because, as you will notice, the topic of susy QM has the tendency to make many people write many rather shallow articles. Stay clear of them and focus on the substantial stuff here.

Speaking of substance, of course the full conceptual impact of supersymmetric QM rests in its relation to index theory and K-theory. You may not need that for your physics project (depends), but for your own education I'd suggest to at least look at the surveys and get the basic idea. This is tremendous stuff.

Finally a fun fact to know -- in particular when somebody quizzes you on applications or is sceptical about the value of supersymmetry -- is that every fermion particle is described by relativistic supersymmetric quantum mechanics on its worldline. See here. This is in itself a somewhat trivial fact really, but drastically underappreciated. It is of course directly related to the way that Witten initially bumped into susy QM in the first place, namely by considering the point-particle limit of superstrings.

share|cite|improve this answer

For an elementary introduction to supersymmetric quantum mechanics see

Supersymmetry and Quantum Mechanics by Cooper et al. available at

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9405029

share|cite|improve this answer
2  
Link-only answer are bad answers by definition. – dmckee Feb 22 '14 at 4:24

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.