Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

So I am given a 2-dimensional harmonic oscillator with $H=H_1+H_2$ where $$H_i=\frac{p_i^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2x_i^2$$ Additionally, $$L=x_1p_2-x_2p_1$$ If we define $$A=\frac{1}{2\omega}[H_1-H_2]$$ $$B=\frac{1}{2}L$$ $$C=\frac{-i}{\hbar}[A,B]$$ Where [A,B] is the commuatator of A with B. We are asked for the explicit form of C, but isnt it just $$[H_1-H_2,L] = [H_1,L]-[H_2,L]=0$$ Due to the isotropy of space. It just does not make sense that C would be 0, because then the three would not be closed under commutation (which I am supposed to show).

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

When I compute the commutator explicitly, I don't get $0$. Use the canonical commutation relations \begin{align} [x_j, p_k] = i\hbar I\delta_{jk} \end{align} where $I$ is the identity operator, and recall that the harmonic oscillator components are independent which means; \begin{align} [x_k, x_j] = 0, \qquad [p_i, p_j] = 0 \end{align} to compute: \begin{align} [H_1-H_2, L] &= [H_1, L] - [H_2, L] \\ &= [H_1, x_1p_2 - x_2p_1] - [H_2, x_1p_2 - x_2p_1] \\ &= [H_1, x_1]p_2 -x_2[H_1, p_1] - x_1[H_2, p_2] + [H_2, x_2]p_1 \\ &= \frac{1}{2m}[p_1^2, x_1]p_2 - \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 x_2[x_1^2, p_1] - \frac{1}{2} m\omega^2 x_1[x_2^2,p_2] + \frac{1}{2m} [p_2^2, x_2]p_1 \\ &= \frac{1}{2m} (-2i\hbar)(p_1p_2 + p_2p_1) - \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2(2i\hbar)(x_2x_1+x_1x_2) \\ &= -\frac{2i\hbar}{m}p_1p_2 - 2im\omega^2\hbar x_1x_2\\ &\neq 0 \end{align}

share|cite|improve this answer
Is this result hermitian? Because it has i in the result doesnt that negate, making adj(c)=-C, not hermitian – yankeefan11 Feb 6 '14 at 14:21
@yankeefan11 Well the commutator I computed above is not hermitian, but $C$ is given by $-i$ times the commutator, so the $i's$ go away making $C$ hermitian. – joshphysics Feb 6 '14 at 16:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.