Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The question and mark scheme I will write in bold and my own thoughts in normal sized text.

I'm told that:

When a $\bf{_{92}^{235}U} $ nucleus is exposed to free neutrons it can absorb a neutron. The resulting nucleus decays, first to $\bf{_{93}^{239}Np}$ and then to $\bf{_{94}^{239}Pu}$.

I'm then asked a few questions this, one of which I don't understand the answer to. They say that:

The number of $\bf{_{93}^{239}Np}$ nuclei present eventually becomes constant, calculate this constant number of $\bf{_{93}^{239}Np}$ nuclei, given that the half life of $\bf{_{93}^{239}Np} = 2.04 \times 10^{5} s$ and that the number of $\bf{_{93}^{239}Np}$ nuclei produced is at a constant rate of $ \bf{1.80 \times 10^{7} s^{-1}} $

The mark scheme uses the equation:

$ \bf{A = \lambda N}$

and rearranges this to say that:

$\bf{N=\dfrac{A}{\lambda}}$ and we also know that $\bf{\lambda = \dfrac{0.693}{t_\frac{1}{2}}}$

$\bf{\therefore \lambda \approx 3.397 \times 10^{-6}}$

I understand all of this and I understand the maths of the next step, I just don't understand why it gives you they value of the number of nuclei of $_{93}^{239}Np$ when the rate of decay of $_{93}^{239}Np$ equals the rate of formation of $_{93}^{239}Np$.

Substituting this value of lambda into our equation for $\bf{N}$ gives us:

$\bf{N = \dfrac{1.8 \times 10^{7}}{3.397 \times 10^{-6}} \approx 5.3 \times 10^{12}}$

$\bf{{\therefore}}$ the number of $\bf{_{93}^{239}Np}$ nuclei when this number becomes constant is $5.3 \times 10^{12}$

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 0 down vote accepted

The rate of decay of Np is $$-\frac{d}{dt}\left[N e^{-\text{Log}(2)t/\tau}\right]_{t=0}=\frac{n \log (2)}{\tau }$$ where $\tau$ is the Np half-life and $A$ is the number of Np atoms present. Equating this with the Np influx rate $A$ and solving for $N$ yields $$N=\frac{A \tau }{\log (2)}=5.3\times10^{12}.$$ Are you confused why you equate the two? If the influx rate was larger than the decay rate, the population would be increasing, not constant, and vice versa.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you, is influx rate the same as activity? –  Elise Feb 4 at 18:05
    
The influx rate is the same as the number of U atoms that decay per second, since each decay produces a Np atom. –  DumpsterDoofus Feb 4 at 18:39
    
Sorry for the late reply, and thank you, I get it now :) –  Elise Feb 5 at 15:54
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.