Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm looking for the critical mass of Polonium; is there a formula? E.g.:$$\text{Neutrons / Protons}\cdot\text{ Constant = X kg}$$

There is a little table in the Wikipedia. E.g.:

$\begin{array}{ccccr} \text{Name}&\text{Symbol}&\text{Neutrons}&\text{Protons}&\text{Crit. mass} \\\hline \text{Uranium-233}&{}^{233}\text{U}&141&92&15\:\mathrm{kg} \\\text{Plutonium-238}&{}^{238}\text{Pu}&144&94&9\text{–}10\:\mathrm{kg} \\\text{Plutonium-240}&{}^{240}\text{Pu}&146&94&40\:\mathrm{kg} \end{array}$

I'm wondering, is there any dependence? What about with a neutron reflector?


What is the critical mass of Polonium?

share|improve this question
    
You cannot have critical mass assembly if it has a short half-life, for its enormous decay heat/time. Plutonium-238 alpha-decay heat is used in radioisotope thermoelectric generators. Champion fissile nuclei are odd-numbered atomic weights. U-233, U-235, Pu-239. Polonium isotopes are useless as critical masses for their very short half-lives. –  Uncle Al Mar 6 at 23:04

2 Answers 2

Apparently not. For Polonium in particular, see
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130813085058AAlzSVd

If calculating critical mass were easy, we'd have a lot of physicists out of work :-( -- or alternatively, the Nazis would have had a working bomb long before 1944.

share|improve this answer
2  
I'm not sure I'd cite answers.yahoo.com if I wanted an authoritative source (though in this case I agree with the answers there). –  John Rennie Feb 4 at 16:00
    
I'll wait for answer with precise in kg. See answer from suitti answered 6 months ago from answers.yahoo.com. –  user2496 Feb 4 at 16:08
    
@user2496: you can only have a critical mass if a chain reaction is possible. This isn't possible for polonium hence you can't define a critical mass for it. –  John Rennie Feb 4 at 17:58

If you have neutron-absorption cross-section/neutron energy, average neutrons/fission emitted within a shake or two of the event, and density of the material, all else is number crunching. Note the world is a dirty place (impurities, multiple isotopes, phase transitions, structural disorder and voids, atmospheric neutrons from cosmic ray atom spallation, increasing temperature plus disassembly in the interval...) so there will be slop in the gears.

Look at isotope half-lives. Assembling a subcritical spherical few kg of polonium is a not insignificant cooling problem. Is polonium fissile at all? No. Also see "tickling the dragon's tail." A Manhattan project engineer sought to assemble an exponentially sub-critical mass of fissile material within neutron-reflecting blocks. As he leaned over, his bodily wealth of neutron-reflecting hydrogen and carbon set it supercritical.

"Layer-cake" cores have been tried. If you simultaneously D-T fusion (lots of 14.1 MeV neutrons) your fission critical mass decreases. However, reaction requires time versus the imploded fissile body rebounding, heating, expanding, and disassembling. An H-bomb has a thick non-fissile U-238 bomb jacket. The blast of neutrons from the fusion secondary are all well in excess of 1 Mev, the (nonpropagating) fission threshold for U-238. It all fissions anyway.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.