Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Possible Duplicate:
Invariant spacetime - distance - Circular Motion

This is a question that I thought up a few years ago when I was taking mechanics. I asked the professor but didn't really get a straight answer.

Imagine a record spinning at relativistic speeds. In the lab frame, the circumference of the record should decrease according to the Lorentz contraction. However the radius of the record should remain fixed since it is orthogonal to the direction of motion. So does the shape of the record appear distorted since the circumference is smaller but the radius is the same? What would it look like?

I have a feeling the answer is obvious and/or well known since it would seem to be similar to the situation of relativistic particles traveling around a circular accelerator but I can't think of how it can be solved.

share|improve this question
2  
Possibly related to physics.stackexchange.com/questions/8659/… –  Lagerbaer May 10 '11 at 21:21
3  
This is the well known Ehrenfest paradox. –  MBN May 10 '11 at 21:22
    
yes, I see this has basically been answered in the link provided by @Lagerbaer. Is the correct protocol to now delete this question? –  BeauGeste May 10 '11 at 22:10
1  
Not necessarily. It might be closed as an "exact duplicate" with a link to the other question, because others might search for "record player" and then your question is a good anchor. –  Lagerbaer May 10 '11 at 23:04
    
I wasn't sure whether this was really an exact duplicate, but after some thought (and since you think the other question's answers cover it, @BeauGeste) I guess it is close enough to be closed. –  David Z May 11 '11 at 5:10
add comment

marked as duplicate by David Z May 11 '11 at 5:10

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1 Answer

As MBN pointed out, this is called the Ehrenfest paradox. Wikipedia summarizes

The modern resolution can be briefly summarized as follows: Small distances measured by disk-riding observers are described by the Langevin-Landau-Lifschitz metric, which is indeed well approximated (for small angular velocity) by the geometry of the hyperbolic plane, just as Kaluza had claimed. For physically reasonable materials, during the spin-up phase a real disk expands radially due to centrifugal forces; relativistic corrections partially counteract (but do not cancel) this Newtonian effect. After a steady-state rotation is achieved and the disk has been allowed to relax, the geometry "in the small" is approximately given by the Langevin-Landau-Lifschitz metric.

I don't have anything to add - I think Wikipedia is good for this one.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.