Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The question: Two very large, nonconducting plastic sheets, each 10.0 cm thick, carry uniform charge densities $\sigma_1$,$\sigma_2$,$\sigma_3$ and $\sigma_4$ on their surfaces, as shown in the following figure. These surface charge densities have the values $\sigma_1= -6.30$ $\mu \text{C}/m^2$ , $\sigma_2= 5.00$ $\mu \text{C}/m^2$, $\sigma_3= 2.10$ $\mu \text{C}/m^2$, and $\sigma_4= 4.00$ $\mu \text{C}/m^2$. Use Gauss's law to find the magnitude and direction of the electric field at the following points, far from the edges of these sheets.

enter image description here

Attempt: So, using Guass' law, I attempt to place the charge densities into a surface and use $E = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}$, representing the sheets as infinite thin sheets.

For A, I have a surface encompassing every $\sigma$. $\sigma_1$ is negative, so it goes into the surface, and the other three are inside the surface and positive, so they are going from inside to outside the surface. Hence, for A, it should be $\frac{\sigma_2 + \sigma_3 + \sigma_4 - \sigma_1}{2\epsilon_0}$.

For B, I have a surface encompassing $\sigma_1, \sigma_2$ and one encompassing $\sigma_3, \sigma_4$. Well, again $\sigma_1$ goes into the surface, and the other three go out of their surfaces, so it would be the same answer as for A, but apparently this isn't right. I would use the same methodology for C, but it would be wrong. I don't understand how to approach this.

Edit: I have read solutions to this elsewhere, but they aren't in-depth enough and aren't satisfactory.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

I am unable to add comments, so I give a few hints here

  1. Look at the derivation of the formula you used for computing field - check its assumptions and scenario carefully - it is slightly different from what you have here
  2. Use the same method as that in the derivation, but, be careful about the values of the field strengths, and you can get the answer.
share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.