Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My new question here: has string theory been analyzed somewhere in the context of various quantization prescriptions formulated in a mathematically sound way? I mean something like geometric quantization, Klauder Quantization, Brownian quantization etc. It is important to know if string theory ever passed through all the mathematical requirements that define a quantum theory; and by the way, are all the mathematical prescriptions defined consistently? Do we have a mathematically sound (consistent) prescription for quantization that is free of ambiguities? People generally boast with the fact that string theory is "mathematically consistent" as a quantization of 1 dimensional objects. Is it so indeed? Is the "quantum" part in string theory really exactly the way it should be? and is the "way it should be" really known?

share|improve this question
I suppose quantization of strings is (at least) as consistent as what we do with QFT :P Only, the UV behaviour is better! –  Siva Feb 2 at 19:49
I suppose that a topological series expansion may require a slight generalization at least in the context of BRST quantization but then what do I know? In the end we are talking about a theory that should presumably explain interactions between black holes, subject where I am (as everyone else) a complete ignorant... –  user33923 Feb 2 at 20:00
I am wondering if that was a spam or a simple misunderstanding: what I mean is a mapping from classical to quantum, like deformation quantization, geometric quantization etc. where you start from a symplectic manifold define a pre-hilbert space, define a polarization etc. The notes in the comment above are at best off topic... but forgivable if unintentional... the notes by "Heisenberg" –  user33923 Feb 2 at 21:16
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 7 down vote accepted

The core of perturbative string theory has a mathematically rigorous formulation. In fact much of mathematical physics and mathematical insight into quantum field theory as such has been gained from the study of the low-dimensional QFTs that constitute the worldvolume theories of the string and the various branes. For instance the axiomatization of QFT in the “FQFT” flavor (roughly dual to the AQFT picture) historically originates in insights gained in the study of (topological) string (namely the Moore-Seiberg axioms). On the other hand, the attempted implementations and applications of core string theory are vast and numerous, and when it finally comes to string phenomenology the usual level of rigor is just that common among practicing quantum field theorists. On the far end, deep aspects of string theory that are felt by many researchers to be of metaphysical relevance, such as the “landscape of string theory vacua” have led and are leading to speculations that are not anymore backed up by any disciplined reasoning.

More in detail:

The quantization of the string sigma-model may be obtained cleanly via the mathematical sound process of geometric quantization, see the references on the nLab at string – Symplectic geometry and Geometric quantization. The famous Weyl anomaly of the string is formally understood in terms of anomalous action functionals, see for instance (Freed 86, 2.). Various other obstructions to quantization (quantum anomalies) in the background fields for the string sigma-model such as notably the Freed-Witten-Kapustin anomaly, have been understood in fine detail in terms of obstructions in differential cohomology, see for instance (Distler-Freed-Moore 09).

Particularly well analyzed are the two special sectors of first quantized string theory, that of rational conformal field theory, which contains the example of strings propagating on Lie group manifolds – the Wess-Zumino-Witten model; as well as the example of topological strings. Rational conformal field theories indeed stand out as one non-trivial and rich class of QFTs which have been subject to complete mathematical classification (in the same sense in which mathematicians for instance do the classification of finite simple groups). For details on this classification see on the nLab at FRS formalism.

For the topological string much more is true. The topological string has effectively become a subject in pure mathematics, with its rigorous axiomatization via the TCFT version of the cobordism hypothesis-theorem, its formulation as mathematical homological mirror symmetry, its relation to geometric Langlands duality etc.

But the FQFT-axiomatics that serves to mathematically formalize the topological string is not restricted to the topological sector, it also applies to the physical string. For instance Huang’s theorem shows that the familiar description of physical string via vertex operator algebra is an instance of the FQFT-formalization. Indeed, in FRS formalism these two formalizations, vertex operator algebras (via their modular tensor categories of representations, and TQFT combined via the rigorous AdS3-CFT2 and CS-WZW correspondence give the classification of rational CFT). (In particular this says that in this low dimensionl holography and AdS-CFT duality is rigorous, of course this is far, far from true in higher dimensions.)

In summary this is a level of rigour with which the worldsheet 2d QFT of the string is understood which is well beyond of what one typically encounters for non-trivial interacting (non-free) QFT. And this is full non-perturbative quantum field theory (on the worldsheet!), not just the approximation in perturbation theory.

From here on, also string field theory (its action functional, that is), has a completely rigorous formulation in terms of operads and L-infinity algebras (Lie n-algebras for n→∞).

A snapshot of the state of the art of rigorous foundations of string theory as of 2011 is in (Sati-Schreiber 11).

The above text with hyperlinks for all technical terms is also on the nLab at string theory FAQ -- Is string theory mathematically rigorous?.

share|improve this answer
Thank you! And congrats for the nlab posts! I read them relatively often. The references therein are also quite useful! :) Now, to the subject: there are several steps in the formal procedure of quantization where choices of a certain degree of arbitrariness are being made (see choice of Polarization, choice of a section of a fiber bundle, choice of a picture, choice of a ghost structure, etc.). The next question: is it possible that certain choices of this kind interact such that new structures emerge? Say, Kahler polarization and spin or complexification and a specific metric? –  user33923 Feb 2 at 22:05
I see what you are after here. Right, so I am not aware of a decent discussion of the space of geometric quantization choices on the string worldsheet itself, the usual Kähler polarization looks maybe too canonical to have inspired many to look for something else. One exception is.. –  Urs Schreiber Feb 2 at 22:37
One exception is Klaus Pohlmeyer and a few of his followers to this day. Pohlmeyer had been hoping that if one changes something about the string quantization prescription that then the critical dimension would go away, see the review here: arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0403260 (together with an argument for why it does not). The latest work inspired by Pohlmeyer is arxiv.org/abs/1204.6263 , which gives a rigorous but perturbative quantization of the 2d Nambu-Goto action, claiming that the anomaly is not seen there. –  Urs Schreiber Feb 2 at 22:38
hmm... gets somehow closer to what I have in mind except that I must insist on being consistent with previous quantization prescriptions, i.e. not to get nonsensical results when applying this to old known theories. Also, the result may not necessarily be elimination of critical dimension but something maybe even better :) –  user33923 Feb 2 at 22:42
I suppose what you are after may not be in the literature yet. But another among articles that study spaces of choices in producing string worldsheet QFTs (for the rational case, e.g. WZW) is Runkel et al.'s "Uniqueness of open/closed rational CFT with given algebra of open states" arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0612306 . –  Urs Schreiber Feb 3 at 0:32
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.