Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the physical meaning of the $c$-numbers $Q, P\in \mathbb{R}$ in the exponent of the Weyl system $\exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar} Q \hat{p}\right]$ and $\exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}P\hat{q}\right]$? Here $\hat{q},\hat{p}$ are operators of position and momentum with canonical commutation relation $[\hat{q},\hat{p}]=i\hbar$.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 0 down vote accepted

There's a considerable danger of oversimplification here, but I find it helpful to think of the construction $e^{i\lambda \hat q}$ as an operator that generates the characteristic function of a probability distribution in a particular state. Being a little free with mathematical details, we can write the probability density of observing the value $q$ in a vector state $\left|\psi\right>$ as $\mathsf{Pr}(q)=\left<\psi\right|\delta(q-\hat q)\left|\psi\right>$, for which the characteristic function is the fourier transform $$C(\lambda)=\int\left<\psi\right|\delta(q-\hat q)\left|\psi\right>e^{i\lambda q}\mathrm{d}q= \left<\psi\right|e^{i\lambda \hat q}\left|\psi\right>.$$ We can inverse fourier transform this back to a probability density. What is commonly labeled $Q$, as you have here, is more helpfully labeled in a way that emphasizes its difference from the position operator and the values that position measurements may take. Mathematically, $\lambda$ is a linear dual of the position. It's very clear what a fourier transform of a probability density is algebraically, but perhaps not so clear what its physical meaning is. It's perhaps best to think of it as a formal device that uses $\lambda$ for keeping track of all the moments of the probabilities of different measurement results, which allows us to say that $\lambda^n$ is associated with the $n$-th moment. [You could do a lot worse, if you want to understand generating functions, though this is slightly idiosyncratic suggestion on my part, to read John Baez's recent series on Network Theory with an open mind; a Google search for "network theory (part" baez finds them. It may well twist your head a little, however, so if you want quick understanding this may not be for you.]

Everything is essentially the same for the momentum operator taken alone, but if we introduce both $\hat q$ and $\hat p$, so that we consider an object such as $$\tilde W(\lambda,\mu)=\int\left<\psi\right|\delta(q-\hat q)\delta(p-\hat p)\left|\psi\right> e^{i\lambda q+i\mu p}\mathrm{d}q\mathrm{d}p= \left<\psi\right|e^{i\lambda \hat q+i\mu\hat p}\left|\psi\right>,$$ and then inverse fourier transform this object, we obtain negative "probability densities" for some values of $p$ and $q$. This is the Wigner function, about which much has been written.

share|improve this answer
    
@user1901 if you put your TeX inside dollar signs, you'll get the more readable $H_{\delta}= h (n+ \delta)^2$. Your comment appears to be conceptually significantly different from your initial Question. I think also that your comment is not enough to put into a definite context. I suggest you edit your Question instead of commenting on my Answer. It appears that I may have missed the point of the Question you intended to ask, although it still looks more-or-less OK to me as an Answer to the Question as you initially asked it. –  Peter Morgan May 9 '11 at 21:20

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.