# Seiberg Witten theory

I'm currently reading the Seiberg-Witten paper on $N=2$ supersymmetric Yang Mills pure gauge theory (i.e. no hypermultiplets). I have the following question:

How does one understand that the metric on the moduli space of the full quantum theory is the same as the metric obtained from the Kahler potential for the scalar field (or in general the $N=1$ chiral superfield) in the low-energy effective theory? On the face of it, the two things seem quite different - while the moduli space is the space of all gauge-inequivalent vacua in the full theory, the Kahler metric is derived from the Kahler potential in the low energy theory.

-

Dear Onkar, they're the same thing. The (massless or at least light) scalar fields are what parameterizes the moduli spaces - in any theory - and the metric on the moduli space (which is a mathematical concept that doesn't "a priori" exist in physics) is defined from the (ultimate low energy) kinetic terms of these scalar fields. In a supersymmetric theory, these kinetic terms $$\frac{1}{2}g_{ij}(\phi_a) \partial_\mu \phi^i \partial^\mu \phi^j$$ are determined from the Kähler potential, $g_{i\bar j}\sim\partial_i \partial_{\bar j} K$ because of the basic supersymmetric calculus. There is a lot of nontrivial maths here but the particular statement you're quoting is a tautology.