Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I came upon this while studying S.H.M.

Well,is there a difference between writing

$$a=\frac{dv}{dt}\;$$

and $$a=v\frac{dv}{dx}\;$$ do they differ on the basis of one being a vector and the other being a scalar equation?Please explain.

share|improve this question
    
$dv/dx$ is not a vector, it's a tensor of second order. When you multiply a vector, $v$, which is a first order tensor and the second order tensor, you get a first order tensor, which is a another vector –  Pranav Hosangadi Jan 26 at 6:17
    
Why do you say the second equation is a scalar equation? –  John Rennie Jan 26 at 8:02
    
Everything is formal without making explicit the physical context. Concerning the first equation you are dealing with a particle whose trajectory is given as a function of time $x=x(t)$, so $v=dx/dt$ and $a= d^2x/dt^2= dv/dt$. What about the second equation? It seems that you are given a function $v=v(x)$. What does this functional relation physically mean? –  Valter Moretti Jan 27 at 7:41
    
@johnrennie because my teacher told me. –  soumyadeep Jan 29 at 2:07

2 Answers 2

In the context of SHM they are probably meant to be interpreted as both scalar equations (ie $x$, $v$ and $a$ are all one-dimensional), especially since they use $x$ and not $r$, but they can also be written vector form. The first equation would be (using $r$ for the position vector)

$$ \vec{a} = \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt} $$

no surprises here. The second would be

$$ \vec{a} = \frac{d\vec{v}}{d\vec{r}} \vec{v} $$

this is strange - how can you differentiate a vector with respect to another vector? Well, let's say we're working in three dimensions. Then an expression like

$$ \frac{d\vec{v}}{d\vec{r}} $$

would be something like, how does $\vec{v}$ change as I change $\vec{r}$? But you can change $\vec{r}$ by changing $x$, $y$ or $z$, then in each case there will be a change in $v_x$, $v_y$ and $v_z$, so you need 9 numbers to specify $\frac{d\vec{v}}{d\vec{r}}$. As @Pranav says, this is a second-order tensor; in cartesian coordinates this would be

$$ \frac{d\vec{v}}{d\vec{r}} = \begin{bmatrix} \dfrac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial v_x}{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial v_x}{\partial y}\\ \dfrac{\partial v_y}{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial v_y}{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial v_y}{\partial y}\\ \dfrac{\partial v_z}{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial v_z}{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial v_z}{\partial y}\\ \end{bmatrix} $$

so the equation does make sense in the end.

share|improve this answer

We know that velocity is defined as $$v=\frac{dx}{dt}$$. Then using the chain rule for derivatives we can write acceleration as $$a=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}v.$$

For vectors lets take the index notation. Then $$v^i=\frac{dx^i}{dt}.$$ The expression for acceleration takes the following form $$a^i=\frac{dv^i}{dt}=\sum_{j=1}^{3}\frac{dv^i}{dx^j} \frac{dx^j}{dt}=\sum_{j=1}^{3}\frac{dv^i}{dx^j}v^j.$$

share|improve this answer
    
Yes i know that.But what i am asking is whether there is a difference on the basis of one being a vector and the other being a scalar equation. –  soumyadeep Jan 26 at 6:05
3  
They both are vector equations. In the second equation you do not do the scalar product, but just a summation of indices. –  Edvard Jan 26 at 6:07

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.