Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In diffraction from a single slit, we learn that the angular width of the central maxima, is given by $2\sin^{-1}\frac \lambda d$. For $d\approx \lambda$, the incoming wavefront should be spread to almost all directions.

Then, when a beam of light passes through a transparent material such as glass, the inter-atomic spacing in the material is almost comparable to $\lambda$, then why does not the incoming light be spread due to diffraction in the entire $2\pi$ steradians, i.e angular width of $\pi$ radians in all directions? Why is it still transmitted approximately as a beam?

share|cite|improve this question

The wavelength of visible light is about 500nm and the interatomic spacing in silica glass is about 0.15nm so there is a factor of around 3,000 difference between $\lambda$ and $d$. That's why light isn't diffracted by the atoms in glass.

share|cite|improve this answer
That means that $d$<$\lambda$, does that not violate the condition $\sin(\theta)\leq 1$? If it does, how do we find out the angular width in which it diffracts light? And for arguments' sake, what if there is a transparent material with $d\approx \lambda$, will it diffract light in all angles? – user4059 Jan 15 '14 at 10:42

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.