Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question already has an answer here:

As the cone cells are different in numbers in people, how can we say that everyone is seeing the color as same? for example the color you are saying as red may be not the one i see as red..

share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by John Rennie, jinawee, Qmechanic Jan 7 '14 at 10:12

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

This question appears to be off-topic because it is about biology and/or perception not physics – John Rennie Jan 7 '14 at 9:44
Questions like this would belong on Cognitive Sciences, I think. I'd be surprised if this isn't a duplicate of one there already. – EnergyNumbers Jan 7 '14 at 9:45
You may find this video interesting: Is Your Red The Same as My Red? – Pulsar Jan 7 '14 at 9:50
You can google "inverted spectrum" for a whole range of literature on this topic. (Mostly in the field of philosophy.) – Nathaniel Jan 7 '14 at 10:08

It is not known. Some would even go as far as to say it is not knowable.

"Color" is a quale; it is one of those things that may be different from one observer to the other, but both observers will always agree on the name, classification, etc. of a particular combination of frequencies and intensities of the EM spectrum. There is no way to discriminate between the two possibly different interpretations.

Physicists do away with this by saying something along the lines of "if there is no way to reliably discriminate between the two, there is no effective difference and it is pointless to consider it."

Philosophers, psychologists, etc. tend to worry about this a lot more. Personally, I think that some time in the not-so-far future it is possible to fully understand how one brain interprets for example "red", if and how it differs from how another brain interprets it, and eventually transfer the precise interpretation of the first brain into the second one, thus doing away with this ridiculous question once and for all!

share|cite|improve this answer

The gauge to measure color perception by our eyes is the rainbow. The colors of the rainbow are only frequency dependent, thus the same for everyone.

Color blind people will confuse the blue with orange, for example, and this will be evident in what they label the rainbow colors.

share|cite|improve this answer
The EM spectrum presented is indeed the same for all observers. "Color" is however an interpreted quality, thus involving a psychological component, possibly making the same colors appear different to different observers. They will all have the same word associations with the same parts or combinations of the spectrum however, so they will be able to successfully communicate this information to each other. – Rody Oldenhuis Jan 7 '14 at 9:19
@RodyOldenhuis but we do associate colors to the rainbow that is why I call it a gauge to measure how each person perceives color. For example a person I know who bought two bright orange chairs, when I asked him what color they were, answered blue. But both his statement "blue" and my statement "orange" might be cone dependent. Naming the colors of the rainbow would be definitive. – anna v Jan 7 '14 at 9:26
Spoken like a true physicist :) I don't disagree with you, there is just a nasty component to this question--it is possible for different observers to agree on the color, even though they both perceive the color differently. It has been demonstrated in various studies that the signals travelling along the optic nerve are (subtly) different for different observers when they look at the same light source under the same conditions. Also, both their brains respond (subtly) differently to the same stimuli as well. That makes it more a cognitive psychology question, not really a physics question. – Rody Oldenhuis Jan 7 '14 at 9:37
@RodyOldenhuis It is also a semantic thing, if all people see it the same and label the rainbow as having two oranges, for example, that will be the "fact". If most people agree on the rainbow then the others are off the chart. – anna v Jan 7 '14 at 9:46
So can we add a standard for defining colors – Sajin Shereef Jan 7 '14 at 10:34

I'd be happier answering this on the Philosophy or psychology stack exchange as I think there ARE actually at least DEFINITE answers to this, one that has a physics component, but an even more fundamental one that is not about physics at all, unless you count the signal processing that begets our consciousness as physics.

The physics component is given well by Anna V's answer and by Rody Oldenhuis's answer: that is that we can use a "standard" like the rainbow and show roughly that different observers will agree on the same colour, unless there is colour blindness. Actually it is more subtle than this, because the wavelength responses of two people's corresponding cones (red response in person 1 compared with red response in person 2, green in person 1 ....) can and is different in many cases. Indeed the green receptor responses split into two very distinct "populations" depending on how the relevant gene encodes the response (I've been looking around for a reference but cannot find it so far). Therefore, when two different spectra can be told apart by one particular person, another can't tell them apart and contrariwise. Some people see traffic light green LEDs as bluish green, others as greenish blue, and the difference is set by which of the two green receptor gene populations the observer belongs to.

Now for Rody's statement:

... it is one of those things that may be different from one observer to the other, but both observers will always agree on the name, classification, etc ....

I believe, psychologically speaking, we can go further than this. Two observers agreeing on the classification certainly will in general have a different experience of a colour, and we can prove this in a simple psychological experiment. How? Ask different people what their favourite colour is! People have different favourite colours: the conscious experience of the same pink will by someone who loves this colour is manifestly different for another observer who loathes the right same spectral mixture of light, even though both agree on the classification.

share|cite|improve this answer
Hmmm...not sure about that last statement. People's favorite colors are (at least in part) determined by past experiences and the positive/negative associations with particular colors. I think it is not sufficient to be able to say that the experiences of color are different, just because their favorites are different. – Rody Oldenhuis Jan 7 '14 at 11:47
@RodyOldenhuis I don't believe how favourites arise matters: my point is that the conscious response is different, and, at a crude level, it can be measured: strong disgust can be detected by physiological response for instance: stress hormone levels, even breathing rates. Now, whether that's seeing differently is debatable, but aside from the physical processes involved in presenting the basic data to the mind, there is only the mind's response to that data. However, as I said, this doesn't really belong to the physics discussion! – WetSavannaAnimal aka Rod Vance Jan 7 '14 at 11:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.