Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I have a line of copper wire (lets say 1 meter long, 1mm thick) and one end is a flattened disk of copper about the size of a quarter, and I apply a lot of heat to it (I'm talking 800 Celsius) will the entire line be heated to the same degree? I mean what temperature will the unheated end be after, say, a minute? Can it too reach 800 degrees over time? how much time? And lets assume it's in a vacuum so no air removes any of the heat the copper holds.

share|cite|improve this question
I have TIG wielded with #12AWG copper wire. One end is liquid, several inches away I hold it in my gloved hand. The glove is for UV protection. I have done the same with aluminum. – Optionparty Dec 31 '13 at 2:45
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Heat transport here obeys the heat diffusion equation $\partial_t T = \chi \partial^2_{xx} T$ where T(x,t) is the temperature and $\chi$ is the heat diffusivity. For copper $\chi \sim 10^{-4}$ m$^2$/s, according to Neglecting heat losses (thermal radiation in vacuum) we can estimate that in time $\tau \sim L^2/\chi$ where $L\sim$1 m is the wire length, the temperature will be pretty well equilibrated along the wire. Putting the numbers in, $\tau \sim 1/10^{-4} = 10^{4}$ s $ \sim $ 1 hour. An exact solution (in the form of a series) can be easily obtained if radiation is neglected. In particular it will show that the temperature at the unheated end will reach 800 C asymptotically in time (but will get close to it in $\tau \sim L^2/\chi$). With radiation, the problem becomes nonlinear so a numerical solution will be needed. But I would expect for this relatively low temperature and assuming a realistic diameter wire the effect of radiation losses will be pretty small, probably it will produce a correction below 1% .

share|cite|improve this answer
The surface area may be small in absolute terms, but the volume is smaller still. The temperature of a thin wire should be affected more by radiation than that of a thick wire. – Douglas Zare Feb 17 '15 at 10:09
You are certainly right, the relative role of surface losses (radiation and others) should be larger for a smaller size body; correcting the misleading statement in the answer. – Maxim Umansky Feb 17 '15 at 18:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.