Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When is it appropriate to use $\hat U$, the unitary time evolution operator? For example, say I had a system in a certain potential that is changed to a different one at time $t = 0$. Would it be valid to operate $\hat U$ on the new wavefunction (at $t = 0$) to calculate the wavefunction at later time $t > 0$?

share|cite|improve this question

The answer to your question "Would it be valid to..." is "yes."

Whenever your Hamiltonian is time-independent over a time interval beginning at some reference time $t_0$, then Schrodinger's equation takes the form

$$|\psi(t)\rangle= \hat{U}\,|\psi(t_0)\rangle $$ where

$$\hat{U} = e^{-i H t/\hbar} $$

is the unitary time evolution operator. It doesn't matter how the wavefunction arrived at its state at $t = t_0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

There is some restrictions on previous answer. Hamiltonian must be time-independent to use $U = e^{-iHt}$ rule. For time-dependent hamiltonian, time-evolution in form $\psi(t) = U(t,t_0) \psi(t_0)$ takes U in more general form $U(t,t_0) = \mathcal{T}\,\exp(-i \int _{t_0} ^ t H(\tau) d\tau)$. Of course, if your potential is constant over $t$ to $t_0$ period, you can use simple form.

share|cite|improve this answer
Hi Vladimir, I just added the time-ordering operator to your expression as it is needed in general when $H(\tau)$ doesn't commute with itself at different values of $\tau$: please check carefully. PS I'm a bit scared of $\mathcal{T}$, I prefer to think of the full Peano-Baker series, but $\mathcal{T}$ is in general use and seems to be less fearsome to physicist in general than to me. – WetSavannaAnimal aka Rod Vance Dec 15 '13 at 10:18
Thanks, WetSavannaAnimal aka Rod Vance, I've just forgot to write it. But I fear that after that even more explaination is needed. You are right, I'ts crucial sometimes, that $H(t)$ doesn't commute with $H(t^\prime)$ in general. – Vladimir Dec 15 '13 at 10:32

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.