Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I would like to support open-access journals by choosing to publish in journals which allow readers free online access. Ideally I would also like to retain copyright instead of signing it over to the journal.

What are some of the better open-access journals in physics? I am particularly interested in journals focused on optics, but let's keep the question general.

share|cite|improve this question
Certainly this should also be of interest to readers too! – nibot Apr 20 '11 at 20:43
Nice question. Why not a community wiki? A list of free access references is maintained here: PSE-list-of-freely-available-physics-books and I'll make a link to this Question. – Helder Velez Apr 21 '11 at 12:15
I don't know how to convert the question to a wiki -- mods feel free to do so. – nibot Apr 21 '11 at 15:47
Yep, that's done. – David Z Apr 22 '11 at 22:25
Personally, I do not like New journal of physics, simply because i do not like the loose layout of the papers. They can make the layout more compact so that a paper does not last for 10 pages always. – Jiang-min Zhang Jul 3 '14 at 13:12

The New Journal of Physics has done a pretty good job attracting serious papers, and there are a number of quite good cold atoms/condensed matter/quantum optics papers.

APS is new to the open access game, but I've no doubt that PRX (which I think, as a community, we should all refer to as Phys. Rev. eXtreme...) will be a good resource when it debuts.

edit: fixed so journal titles are links

share|cite|improve this answer
It's exciting that PRX is starting up so soon! – nibot Apr 21 '11 at 0:02
Ofcourse it is a nice development, but PRX does charge 1500,- per article published... And none of that money goes to the referees -- the journal takes all. – Olaf Apr 21 '11 at 11:50
Optics express also charges publication fees. I actually don't know of any peer -reviewed open-access journals that don't. I also have never been paid to referee. – Andrew Apr 21 '11 at 13:18
Here's the press release about the start of PRX, giving the $1500 figure: . The site doesn't have much information at the moment. Are there submission guidelines yet? – nibot Apr 21 '11 at 18:01
At least APS is a not-for-profit membership-based organization and not a for-profit corporation (like Nature Publishing Group, etc). – nibot Apr 21 '11 at 18:02

Optics express is excellent. Fast turnaround, high impact factor, and decent peer review.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, nibot! I should have linked. – Andrew Apr 21 '11 at 14:14


Though it is not a journal in the classical meaning (it is a repository of preprints), to some extent it serves as such. So when you care for the open-access, advisable it to upload your paper to arXiv and then send to a peer-review journal (open or not).

Sending a paper to arXiv give also other benefits - it is (almost) immediately accessible to the scientific community. So it both boosts the research process and prevents form being scooped.

(And out of my personal philosophy - publicly funded research should be released openly, not locked in private hands.)

share|cite|improve this answer
When is it permissible to post an article on the arXiv? i.e. Won't some journals (such as Science?) refuse to publish an article that has already appeared in the arXiv? – nibot Apr 22 '11 at 18:30
@nibot: that's called Ingelfinger's Rule. Most journals do not apply it so strictly. It is most often applied to discussions with the media prior to publication. Circulating pre-prints, conference/poster presentations are usually exempt from it. And almost all physics/maths specialty journals will not count arXiv against you (I mean, just look at home many pre-prints get circulated each day in the hep-th section of arXiv!) – Willie Wong Apr 22 '11 at 20:56
@nibot: Most physics journals I know either explicitly state that archiving a preprint is permitted (they don't count it as a publication) or just don't fight with it. And most current quant-ph are archived. AFAIK Nature and Science do not allow such publication. – Piotr Migdal Apr 23 '11 at 14:04

With regard to open access publication of conference proceedings, I draw your attention to Proceedings of Science . From their webpage:

"The aim of PoS is to offer a versatile, fast, inexpensive and open tool devised and run by the scientific community for the scientific community. The service will hence be open to all readers free of charge and the fees for publication will be kept low on a not-for-profit basis.

Given the Open Access nature of this proceedings collection, PoS has chosen to apply the Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike). Every author submitting his/her contribution to PoS retains the copyright, and upon submission (s)he applies this license to his/her work."

(emphasis mine).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.