Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I need to find the approximate solution of nonlinear Schrodinger equation $$ i\hbar \partial_{t} \Psi + \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\Delta \Psi - g |\Psi|^{2}\Psi - \frac{m\omega^2 (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}{2}\Psi = 0 $$ by using variational method. $\Psi$ has norm $\int |\Psi|^{2}d^{3}\mathbf r = N$, where N is the number of particles.

It was saying to me that I must start from the trial function $$ \Psi (x, y, z) = h e^{-\frac{1}{2\omega^{2}}\left( x^2 + y^2 + z^2\right)}e^{\frac{i}{\hbar}\mu t}, $$

where $\mu$ plays role of chemical potential.

So by using the property of $\Psi$ I got $h = \frac{\sqrt{N}}{(\omega \pi )^{\frac{3}{4}}}$. Then, due to the variational method, I must compute functional $J(N) = \langle \Psi | \hat {H}| \Psi\rangle$ and determine N from relation $\frac{\partial J (N)}{\partial N} = 0$. But I don't understand this step, because $N$ already is given in the task and equal to the integer number. So I don't have parameters in the trial function which can minimize functional $J(N)$.

Can you help me? Maybe, there is the mistake in the trial function and it must be some parameter $l^2$ instead of $\omega^{2}$?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Brandon Enright, John Rennie, jinawee, Qmechanic Dec 9 '13 at 15:23

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Homework-like questions should ask about a specific physics concept and show some effort to work through the problem. We want our questions to be useful to the broader community, and to future users. See our meta site for more guidance on how to edit your question to make it better" – Brandon Enright, John Rennie, jinawee, Qmechanic
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Minimizing the energy with respect to $N$ will give a relationship between $\mu$, $N$, and the other parameters of the system. This will fix the chemical potential to something like $\mu=gN$ (this is the correct value in the limit $\omega\to0$).

For sure the trial wave-function has a problem since $x^2/\omega^2$ is not dimensionless, but it seems quite obvious that you should just use the typical length scale given by the harmonic oscillator (that you called $l$, if I guess correctly).

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you. So you meaned that I get from $\langle \Psi |\hat {H}| \Psi \rangle $ expression $J(N, l)$ from the one side and $\mu $ from the another, which leads to fixing $\mu$? Is this step all that I must to do? –  Andrew McAddams Dec 4 '13 at 20:00
    
@AndrewMcAdams: because you're looking for an eigenstate of $\hat H$, you have $\langle \Psi|\hat H|\Psi\rangle/\langle \Psi|\Psi\rangle=\mu$, and you want to minimize this to get the ground-state (or to as close to it as possible with this ansatz). –  Adam Dec 4 '13 at 20:33

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.