Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The Minkowski metric transforms under Lorentz transformations as

\begin{align*}\eta_{\rho\sigma} = \eta_{\mu\nu}\Lambda^\mu_{\ \ \ \rho} \Lambda^\nu_{\ \ \ \sigma} \end{align*}

I want to show that under a infinitesimal transformation $\Lambda^\mu_{\ \ \ \nu}=\delta^\mu_{\ \ \ \nu} + \omega^\mu_{{\ \ \ \nu}}$, that $\omega_{\mu\nu} = -\omega_{\nu\mu}$.

I tried expanding myself: \begin{align*} \eta_{\rho\sigma} &= \eta_{\mu\nu}\left(\delta^\mu_{\ \ \ \rho} + \omega^\mu_{{\ \ \ \rho}}\right)\left(\delta^\nu_{\ \ \ \sigma} + \omega^\nu_{{\ \ \ \sigma}}\right) \\ &= (\delta_{\nu\rho}+\omega_{\nu\rho})\left(\delta^\nu_{\ \ \ \sigma} + \omega^\nu_{{\ \ \ \sigma}}\right) \\ &= \delta_{\rho\sigma}+\omega^\rho_{\ \ \ \sigma}+\omega_{\sigma\rho}+\omega_{\nu\rho} \omega^\nu_{{\ \ \ \sigma}} \end{align*}

Been a long time since I've dealt with tensors so I don't know how to proceed.

share|improve this question
    
@Qmechanic: Why the homework tag? "[...] any question where it is preferable to guide the asker to the answer rather than giving it away outright." - If it's not actual homework, shouldn't the OP decide what kind of answer he'd prefer? If I asked the question and needed the answer for actual work, I'd be very unhappy if given a pedagogical answer. –  jdm Nov 21 '13 at 13:22
    
@jdm: The homework tag does not relate to whether it is actual homework or not; it relates to the content of the question. See Phys.SE homework policy for details. –  Qmechanic Nov 21 '13 at 13:39
    
Sorry, I need to remember to add homework tags >_< –  user82235 Nov 21 '13 at 14:19
    
Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/28535/2451 –  Qmechanic Nov 21 '13 at 16:11
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Note that if you lower an index of the Kronecker delta, it becomes the metric:

$\eta_{\mu\nu}\delta^{\mu}_{\rho}=\delta_{\nu\rho}=\eta_{\nu\rho}$

And in your last step you got a wrong index. It should be $\omega_{\rho\sigma}$, not $\omega^{\rho}_{\sigma}$.

Then, the metric terms cancel and you neglect cuadratic terms.

That should be enough to solve it.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Since the Lorentz transformation is valid for any $x\in M_{4}$, it can be rewritten as $\Lambda_{\rho}^{\mu}\eta_{\mu\nu}\Lambda_{\sigma}^{\nu}=\eta_{\rho\sigma}$. Substituting the infinitesimal form of the Lorentz transformation into the previous formula we get

$$(\delta_{\rho}^{\mu}+\omega_{\rho}^{\mu})\eta_{\mu\nu}(\delta_{\sigma}^{\nu}+\omega_{\sigma}^{\nu})+o(\omega^{2})=\eta_{\rho\sigma}$$

after expanding

$$\eta_{\rho\sigma}+\omega_{\rho}^{\mu}\eta_{\mu\nu}\delta_{\sigma}^{\nu}+\omega_{\sigma}^{\nu}\eta_{\mu\nu}\delta_{\rho}^{\mu}+o(\omega^2)=\eta_{\rho\sigma}$$

and from this we can see that

$$\omega_{\rho\sigma}+\omega_{\sigma\rho}=0\Rightarrow\omega_{\rho\sigma}=-\omega_{\sigma\rho}$$

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.