Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Here I want to summarize the various kinds of topological ground-state degeneracy in condensed matter physics and want to know whether there exists any other kind of topological degeneracy. For convenience, let's consider a 2D lattice system with $N$ lattice sites, and we may consider the finite system with open boundary condition(OBC) or periodic boundary condition(PBC). Now there are two kinds of topological degeneracy:

(1)The topological degeneracy is approximate for finite $N$ no matter with OBC or PBC, and it becomes exact degenerate only under the thermodynamic limit($N\rightarrow \infty $). Example: FQHE.

(2)The topological degeneracy(>1) is exact for any finite $N$ with PBC(on a torus), and it's nondegenerate for any finite $N$ with OBC. Example: Kitaev's toric code model.

Is there any other kind(in the above sense) of topological degeneracy?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Topological degeneracy is only defined in the thermodynamic limit on a closed manifold. The ground state degeneracy of a finite-sized system or on an open manifold is not "topological", and can not be called topological degeneracy.

Considering your examples. (1) The ground state degeneracy is ill-defined with open boundary condition. Because there might be gapless edge modes on the boundary (which is indeed the case for FQHE), such that low-energy states form a continuum and the "ground state" can not be separate out. (2) The exact degeneracy for toric code model on a finite-sized system is not robust against local perturbation, and therefore not topological. Adding an $h \sigma_x$ term to the toric code Hamiltonian is enough to lift the degeneracy for finite-sized system. It is only because that the toric code model is fine-tuned to an ideal point that the degeneracy happens to be exact. In reality, finite-sized system is not topologically robust, so it makes no sense to classify the degeneracy for a finite-sized system.

share|improve this answer
    
@ Everett You Thank you for clarifying my misunderstanding of topological degeneracy. –  K-boy Nov 20 '13 at 12:09

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.