Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Eventually, we are going to reach our limits in particle physics, or maybe find the theory of everything. Particle physics isn't easy by any means. It requires at the minimum years of graduate school and more to master. The main motivation of learning is to come up with original research later. But if there is no more research to do in the future, hardly anyone would be motivated to learn particle physics given its intrinsic difficulty. What would happen then? Would knowledge of particle physics disappear because no one would be around to remember it? Or would it become a scholastic tradition passed down dogmatically from generation to generation.

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off topic by Moshe R., Marek, David Z Apr 12 '11 at 16:45

Questions on Physics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

From the FAQ "You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face. Chatty, open-ended questions diminish the usefulness of our site and push other questions off the front page." Seems to me case at point right here. – user566 Apr 11 '11 at 16:12
I personally think this is a very good question, for soon-to-graduate students, choosing a field to go into for the PhD is highly important. I noticed a tendency in fellow classmates to veer away from traditional experimental particle physics, since it looks like the LHC has done (one of) it's job, and until we have something many many ... many times more powerfull, which would be very expensive, research in this area may reach a platau. – Flint72 May 9 '14 at 21:23

There are huge challenges left in particle physics. There are number of free parameters which are put by hand to make proper predictions. Physicists will continue to struggle to find a theory which will predict those parameters. There are other compelling reasons to consider that there must be some post standard model physics. There is still the problem of a completely satisfactory quantum theory of gravity.

String theory is one answer which is an work in progress. It has not predicted those parameters from the theory till now but who knows what surprises may come in this journey.

Huge fields of study in particle physics lay before the physicists and the investigation is by no means over.

As someone says ‎"Confusion and disorientation reign…. Very likely we are still confused beginners with very wrong mental pictues, and ultimate reality remains far beyond our grasp… The more we discover, the less we seem to know. That’s physics in a nutshell...".

share|cite|improve this answer
Not to mention that we're a long, long way from having experiments capable of even beginning to sort any of this out. – Jerry Schirmer Apr 11 '11 at 15:50

A view of history helps:

Lord Kelvin (whose name was used for a unit of temperature) also said at the end of the 19th century that physics was finished, that everything had been understood, that our theories worked so well that they could not be wrong, but that there were perhaps two small clouds in the blue sky (in fact these small clouds were to lead to the theories of relativity and quantum physics!!!).

I will repeat the trite that knowledge is a circle with an expanding radius. Within the circle is the known, without is the unknown. The more the known is enlarged the greater the contact with unknowns.

Now specifically for particle physics, maybe it will go the way of thermodynamics, or electromagnetism :) . These disciplines are still being studied by physicists because new frontiers also open new questions in old disciplines.

Particle physics is no harder than other physics branches when one tries to describe and learn as much as possible. Now suppose that strings do turn up to be the theory of everything. Have you looked at what this everything is? at least six more dimension and God knows what this means as far as our reality goes. Rather future generations of physicists will try to see what this means.

In addition the tools available to physicists for calculations and experiments could not even be dreamed about during Lord Kelvin's time. Why should we be able to dream successfully about how physics and experiments will be 100 years hence?

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.