Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I presume the answer is that it depends on the mass and size of the star and black hole and how they approach either other, but I was wondering if somebody could provide some rough bounds (e.g. hours vs thousands of years) theorized or based on historical observed data.

By "eating" I mean the time it takes a star to go through the event horizon of the black hole and potentially reach the singularity.

share|cite|improve this question
are you referring to a star&black hole binary system? – Nic Apr 9 '11 at 0:07
Nothing crosses the event horizon according to an external observer. – Rob Jeffries Mar 15 at 21:30
up vote 4 down vote accepted

One of the main ways black holes are noticed is by looking at a solar system where the star appears to move as though it were a binary star system (e.i. two stars) when only one is seen. In these situations, depending on the distances, the black hole "feeds" off the original star, and a stream of the stellar plasma is slowly pealed off the star into the black hole.

This matter can sometimes form a very vivid accretion disk, that can be observed using telescopes (see Herbig–Haro object). This process can take a very long time, on the order of millions of years. However, of course, a rogue black hole could enter a star system head on and collide right with the sun and "suck it up," which would happen rather quickly (to an outside observer).

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks! I never thought that "a rough black hole could enter a star system head on and collide right with the sun and 'suck it up'". Fascinating. – Amelio Vazquez-Reina Apr 9 '11 at 13:49
I think he meant rogue not rough, no? As in rogue wave (ocean phenomenon). – Marcos Sep 14 '12 at 13:14

If you are asking about a star being "eaten" by a supermassive black hole at the center of a galaxy, as is being in another question here on Physics SE due to a recent event covered in the popular press (GRB 110328A), this relatively authoritative paper says that they stay bright for one month to one year.

This long period is due to the orbiting of the torn up parts of the star.

Probing Quiescent Massive Black Holes:
Insights from Tidal Disruption Events
A Whitepaper Submitted to the Decadal Survey Committee

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks Jim! It was GRB 110328A indeed what made me think about this question. – Amelio Vazquez-Reina Apr 9 '11 at 19:02
Minor comment to the post (v1): In the future please link to abstract pages rather than pdf files, e.g., – Qmechanic Dec 2 '14 at 21:32

protected by Qmechanic Dec 2 '14 at 21:30

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.