# How does a maple syrup evaporator work?

Some background info on what an evaporator is: It is a system of metal pans set over a heat source. Sap constantly enters the first pan controlled by a float valve to keep a constant depth. The pans have channels which are open to each other at alternating ends, so that the sap flows back and forth in a serpentine pattern. At the end of the pan system there is a manual valve where you periodically draw off finished syrup. From the beginning of the pan system to the end there is a ever-increasing concentration of sugar.

My question is, how does the sap get more concentrated towards the end of the pan? Or conversely, how is it that the sap doesn't maintain a homogenous sugar concentration throughout? (If you let the fire go out, once the sap cools it will redistribute itself until it is homogenous.)

I think somebody will probably tell me it has to do with the distance the sap has flowed through the pan by the time it gets to the other end (it would be a linear distance of about 24 feet in my system) but I don't think that answers the question because when you first start a batch, you flood the whole system with cold, fresh sap, all of uniform sugar content, and then you start the fire. It doesn't take long before there is a visible color difference between each channel of the final pan, with the darkest one being next to the draw-off valve.

And no, it's not flow caused by the pans being angled downwards either (a BS answer posted on yahoo!answers to a similar question). The pans are perfectly level. And as far as I can tell the heat intensity from the fire below is uniform at least for the final four channels, which are where you really begin to see visible color graduation as it becomes syrup.

There is one detail that I didn't describe at first because I couldn't figure out how to without a drawing, so now that I've added the drawing I'll elaborate on that. The first pan, where the sap goes in, has flues, which are deep, narrow vertical pockets in the bottom of the pan, which reach all the way down into the stove itself. The flames actually pass between the flues on their way to the stovepipe. This (obviously) greatly increases the surface area being heated. I don't know if this changes anything but I thought I should add it.

-
Could you break this into more readable paragraphs, please? Also, if you can find some photos of the set up, that would be helpful in visualizing the apparatus. – Mark Eichenlaub Apr 8 '11 at 6:35
Welcome to physics.SE! I see your linebreaks in the source, you have to leave one line empty to start a new paragraph. Also, to improve readability you can emphasize the core of your question by using the quote symbol > for that lines – Tobias Kienzler Apr 8 '11 at 7:42
Here is a picture link from a previous question on foam at maply syrup boiling. sites.google.com/site/lindsayssugarbush/_/rsrc/1240515239201/… – Georg Apr 8 '11 at 9:32
really nice picture! – lurscher Jun 14 '11 at 20:51

What's going on is that there are two flows here, a gas flow (produced by boiling) and a liquid flow. The liquid flow is from the entrance to the exit while the gas flow is to the air. The gas flow is controlled by allowing only one exit for the gas, near the place where you add syrup.

The longer the fluid spends in the contraption the more water is boiled out of it and the more sugar that is left. So by the time the liquid gets to the output spigot it's spent a lot of time boiling and has lost a lot of water.

The process is similar to distillation in that the steam preferentially carries off water rather than sugar. This suggests that a more efficient method of processing maple syrup is distillation, and that designing an evaporator so that it mimics the distillation process as much as possible is a good idea. The US Forest Service agrees:

Processing Maple Syrup with a Vapor Compression Distiller: An Economic Analysis Lawrence D. Garrett, Forest Service Research Paper NE-385, 1977
Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Northeastern Forest Experiment Station
6816 Market Street, Upper Darby, PA 19082

A test of vapor compression distillers for processing maple syrup revelaed that (1) vapor compression equipment tested evaporated 1 pound of water with 0.047 pounds of steam equivalent (electrical energy); open-pan evaporators of similar capacity required 1.5 pounds of steam equivalent (oil energy) to produce 1 pound of water; (2) vapor compression evaporators produced a syrup of equal quality to that from a conventional open-pan evaporation plant; and (3) a central plant producing 8,000 gallons of syrup per year should yield a return of 16 percent on investment. Increasing annual product output should increase the return on investment.

-
""The second reason for running the apparatus this way is that the fewer of the volatiles will be sent out with the gas."" This is nonsense. ""The pans are organized in a manner similar to a distillation apparatus."" I'd like to see such "distillation apparatus. In general: rechurning -1 – Georg Apr 11 '11 at 10:08
@Georg; I know a lot more about distillation than you think. I was the VP of engineering at Liquafaction corporation. My paper on black holes: arxiv.org/abs/0907.0660 lists my address as 720 Road N NE. This is, in fact, an ethanol distillation plant. See page 12 of: newprojectnews.com/jan08.pdf for the announcement that the same address was permitted for ethanol distillation production. – Carl Brannen Jun 12 '11 at 4:48
Here's a link to the processing of maple syrup referred to as distillation: "The exact origins of the discovery of maple sap and its distillation, or processing, into syrup is impossible to determine with any firm historical accuracy." associatedcontent.com/article/2718987/… Another reference: massmaple.org/history.php – Carl Brannen Jun 13 '11 at 4:02
An ethanol distillery typically has two products, ethanol and distiller's grains. The equivalent products for a maple syrup distillation is water and maple syrup. The portion of a distillation tower who's action is equivalent to a maple syrup processor is the "stripper". Instead of "bottoms" coming out of the bottom, you have maple syrup. But in both cases, the gas coming out of the top is largely water. – Carl Brannen Jun 13 '11 at 19:00
The gas escapes along the entire surface area. Most large scale sugaring operations use reverse osmosis on the front end of the process - then they feed the concentrated sap into the evaporator. – Tim Jun 29 '11 at 21:08

I can't vouch for the answer here, but it purports to be the reason.

The evaporator is perfectly level. If that's the case, visitors often wonder how it is that sap moves through the pan. Forgotten is the fact that rising steam is the equivalent of dipping or draining liquid from the pan. A level bottom means that sap moves under the pull of gravity as water leaves the pan as steam. (That, of course, is the whole objective of the process!) The sugar stays behind forming a syrup of increasing sweetness to make the finished product. At that point, the sugar concentration is at 60% and the boiling point is elevated about 7 degrees. The difference in viscosity coupled with the baffles in the pan allows finished syrup to accumulate in the last section without our ever having to mechanically separate the final product. At the end of the season or if, for some reason, we wish to shut down the process and empty the pans, it is possible to draw off virtually all the syrup. One could not, of course, simply drain the pan. The fire would cause melt-down in a matter of seconds. Instead, soft water from the farm pond takes the place of the entering raw sap and supplies the necessary cooling liquid. Boiling continues, and because of their different viscosities, the syrup and pond water do not mix significantly. This same situation occurs when oils of different densities flow sequentially in a transcontinental pipeline. Very little mixing occurs at the interface between the two products. Virtually all the syrup can be drawn off before the pond water arrives at the discharge valve.

I suppose the big question is why doesn't the liquid become homogeneous? That's probably due to the baffles limiting the interface significantly - reducing the the ability of the most concentrated fluid to mix with the most diluted.

-
""The evaporator is perfectly level"" Maybe, but the surface of the liquid isn't! When You watch the Missisipy down in Loisiana it looks quite level, but nevertheless there is some inclination of the surface towards the mouth! With the syrup gaining density by evaporation things are more complicated – Georg Jun 30 '11 at 9:53

In answer to how does your evaporator work: in the pan there is a frontal boundary of sugar concentrations, the long narrow compartments minimize this frontal boundary. The effectiveness of the evaporator is determined by the travel speed through the compartments versus the migration of sugar as it attempts to dissolve into the solution, thus segregating the fresh incoming sap from that boiled for a period of time allowing us to draw syrup continuously as sap is added continuously. Keeping steady feed, steady heat, minimal foam, and steady draw minimizes the intermixing that might occur. The density or the viscosity of the product has absolutely no bearing on this process.

-
I think the part about density being irrelevant is not, in principle, true. Since the density of enriched syrup is greater (up to 50%) than raw sap, at high addition rates if all else were equal the new sap would spread across the top of the liquid, rather than maintaining the horizontal gradient. In practice, though, you're right. And hot syrup has low viscosity anyways. – WhatRoughBeast Jul 21 '15 at 19:37

(If you let the fire go out, once the sap cools it will redistribute itself until it is homogenous.) I think somebody will probably tell me it has to do with the distance the sap has flowed through the pan by the time it gets to the other end (it would be a linear distance of about 24 feet in my system)

As You write, the pans all have a level "floor". This enables the concentrated (and higher density) sap from the last pan to flow as a stream close to the bottom backwards, the lighter sap from the first compartments will stream on top "downwards". (This is similar to salt water streaming "upward" at the mouth of a river from sea. ) In case the evaporator then rests for longer time, diffusion will equalize the sugar concentration vertically. That will take days I think. The stream "downward" of the low concentration sap on top at high temperature (fire just went out) is faster, and that is what You "see" or taste when testing with a finger dipped in.

but I don't think that answers the question because when you first start a batch, you flood the whole system with cold, fresh sap, all of uniform sugar content, and then you start the fire. It doesn't take long before there is a visible color difference between each channel of the final pan, with the darkest one being next to the draw-off valve. And no, it's not flow caused by the pans being angled downwards either (a BS answer posted on yahoo!answers to a similar question). The pans are perfectly level. And as far as I can tell the heat intensity from the fire below is uniform at least for the final four channels, which are where you really begin to see visible color graduation as it becomes syrup.

This part I refuse to "believe".The problem I see is Your idea of

uniform heat intensity from the fire

The process of evaporation in such a pan is controlled by the heat flux into the pan. (For every Joule of heat energy forced through the bottom, You get a certain amount of water evaporated into steam). Maybe that heat flux is homogenous, maybe not, this is a very tricky business of construction. Without inspecting details of the fire grate / stack gas ducts / details of pans from below, I have no idea on "truth".

In general and terms of chemical technology that pan(s) is a flow tube reactor (evaporator). The bubbles generated by evaporation make the medium turbulent. Such a flow is rather easy to treat mathematically, because it can be approximated rather exactly by assuming plug flow with perfect mixing across the flow, and some minor mixing along (in direction of) flow. The channels conecting the pans are some restriction to longitudinal mixing. The approximation is done by replacing this flow tube reactor by a cascade of the proper number of stirred reactors for each pan, and that cascades are cascaded to make tha model of the entire evaporator.

The medium (sap) is getting denser along the path of flow, due to increasing sugar concentration. But at the same time the temperature increases, this will reduce the density due to thermal expansion. The net effect of concentration and temperature will lead to a flow as explained above (after shut down) This flow counter to net product flow would impair the evaporation efforts. So, if I had to construct such an apparatus, I would use a little bit of inlination and more baffles to reduce this effect.

This is the theory You need to make an "ansatz" :=). In practice, I would try to find someone producing such evaporators, that people might know quantitatively what I can say only qualitative. There is some risk, that nobody ever developed those evaporators, but all was done in small steps starting with pans from kitchen by village blacksmiths, then nobody knows exactly.

PS

I just googeled for "maple syrup evaporator" to find a lot of pictures and some very instructive videos as well. One thing is important to Your question:

All the evaporators use countercurrent heat exchange. (Sap flow is opposite to the flow of stack gas) This is done very simply by pouring the sap from bin to bin with the most primitive tinkered evaporators, others have a continuous flow as You described.

This means that Your idea of "uniform heat intensity from the fire" is not reality.

-
Hi Georg, thank you for your answer. I am not quite sure what you mean about the backwards streaming of concentrate and downwards streaming of lighter sap. Are you saying that the sap concentration is vertically stratified while it is boiling? Wouldn't all that vigorous bubbling mix it up? Or is that what happens when it cools and mixes together? – MEM Apr 10 '11 at 21:13
This is the answer to Your first qu. "if You let the fire..." I thought that is clear? BTW Your sketch (thank You!) proves the countercurrent heat exchange, which explains Your finding in Your second claim. (as Í surmised in my answer). – Georg Apr 10 '11 at 21:23
Oops, pressed enter before I was ready... As far as heat uniformity, I do agree it couldn't be completely uniform, but probably more heat on the front pan than the back. Laterally in the front pan, any hot spot would be in the center, under the middle two channels. If that was driving the flow of syrup wouldn't the finished syrup end up in the middle of the pan rather than the side? – MEM Apr 10 '11 at 21:26

I have been boiling sap all weekend and have been wondering the exact same thing. When you are not drawing off syrup, and only adding sap to one end of the pan, why is the concentration of sugar more at the end (where the syrup tap is) and the lowest where you drip the sap in?

Okay - visualize the zig zag pattern of the pan as a long trough that goes left to right. You dump sap in the left side only. You are not drawing out of the right side yet. Equivalent boiling is occurring over the entire surface. Although there is no liquid coming out of the pan, the net flow of sap is from left to right because you are adding it to the right side, and it is being lost to the air at an even rate over the whole thing. The speed of the water flow is the fastest on the left side, and the slowest on the right side. As the water moves to the right, it also goes up, into the air as steam. As the sugar in the water moves to the right is does not go up, it only stays in the pan. The water/sugar on the left is moving faster, so it "leaves less sugar behind" and the water on the right moves slower, so "more sugar is left behind" leaving the sugar concentration on the right (or the end of the pan) greater than the concentration on the left (the beginning of the pan).

I will illustrate an analogy: Imagine a 1000 meter running race. No imagine that the runners (the sap) have pockets full of sand with a holes in their pockets. As soon as they start running, the sand starts running out of the holes in their pockets. They are running really fast at first and the amount of sand on the ground represents the sugar content in the liquid in the evaporator pan. They are getting tired half way through the race, thus leaving more sand per square inch on the ground. At the end, they are pooped, and moving really slowly. The sand is still spilling out onto the ground at the same rate (equal boiling rate over the whole pan). The speed of each runner approaches zero as the near the end of the race. The race track is covered with sand at the end. More runners keep starting the race at you dribble sap in and they all run the same way - fast in the beginning, slow at the end. Sand spills out at the same rate throughout the race. Sprinkles of sand in the beginning, piles at the end.

I'm pretty sure this is whats going on here. Osmosis is what describes why it becomes a uniform concentration when you stop dripping sap in and let it boil without taking any syrup off.

-

## protected by Qmechanic♦Mar 16 '14 at 22:57

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.