Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let us assume that we have this circuit:

Non trivial circuit

We know that:

$$I_1 = I_2 + I_3$$ $$I_1R_1 + I_3R_3 = V$$ $$I_1R_1 + I_2R_2 + \dfrac{q_c}{C_1} = V$$

Therefore we can write:

$$I_1 = k_1 - k_2*q_c$$

with:

$$k_1 = \dfrac{V(1/R_2+1/R_3)}{1+R_1/R_2+R_1/R_3}$$ $$k_2 = (R_2*C_1(1+R_1/R_2+R_1/R_3))^(-1)$$

The question is, Can we write the equation:

$$\dfrac{dq(t)}{dt}={k_1-k_2q(t)}$$

I doubt if $q_c=q(t)$ because $I_3$ does not flow through the branch which contains the capacitor, therefore:

$$I_1 = I_2 + I_3 => q_1 = q_2 + q_3$$

I think $q(t)=q_1$ But if it is so $q_2 = q_c \neq q(t)$. How can I write down the differential equation in order to find $q(t)$?

share|improve this question
3  
That's rather a question for electronics.stackexchange.com I suppose... –  Nicolas Oct 21 '13 at 15:28

1 Answer 1

How can I write down the differential equation in order to find q(t)?

There are generally several ways to solve a circuit but some may be far more straightforward than others. The most straightforward approach to find $q_C(t)$ in this case is to transform this circuit into a simple series RC circuit.

By finding the Thevenin equivalent circuit seen from the capacitor terminals, we get by inspection:

$$V_{TH} = V\dfrac{R_3}{R_1 + R_3}$$

$$R_{TH} = R_2 + R_1||R_3$$

Since we now have a simple series RC circuit, the solution for the capacitor current is well known:

$$i_C(t) = i_C(0)e^{-t/\tau} $$

$$\tau = R_{TH}C_1 $$

The solution for the capacitor charge follows by integration:

$$q_C(t) = \tau i_C(0)(1 - e^{-t/\tau}) + q_C(0) = C_1V_{TH}(1 - e^{-t/\tau}) + q_C(0)e^{-t/\tau} $$

share|improve this answer
    
I was not familiar with notation $R_1||R_3$, it means "the equivalent resistance for a composed set of $R_1$ and $R_3$ in parallel $(||)$ way". However, You solve $q_c(t)$ and I'm asking for $q_1(t)$, or, are these functions the same? –  Phyllipe Oct 21 '13 at 22:23
    
@Phyllipe, they are not the same. You're not familiar with the notation for parallel resistances? It is: $R_1||R_3 = \dfrac{1}{\frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_3}}$ –  Alfred Centauri Oct 21 '13 at 22:30
    
I need $I_1(t)$ so in order to find it I asked for $q(t)$ (If I derive $q(t)$ respect to time I'll be able to find $I_1(t)$). However, you find $q_c(t)$ and I dunno how can I get $q(t)$. I was not familiar... –  Phyllipe Oct 21 '13 at 22:37
    
@Phyllipe, now that you have $i_C(t)$, isn't is clear how to proceed to find $i_1(t)$? –  Alfred Centauri Oct 21 '13 at 23:29
    
No, it is not clear to me. –  Phyllipe Oct 27 '13 at 19:38

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.