Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question already has an answer here:

This is the image of the paragraph from the book

Why should an equation (TDSE) in which first time derivative is related to second space derivative have a solution that contains $i$?The wave function is supposed to be complex, but I am unable to understand why it can also be assumed to be complex directly from my previous statement as stated in Quantum Physics by Eisberg & Resnick. Can anyone help me develop an intuition?

share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by John Rennie, Qmechanic Oct 21 '13 at 0:01

This question was marked as an exact duplicate of an existing question.

Possible duplicates: and links therein. – Qmechanic Oct 20 '13 at 12:47
Why the downvotes? – Ben Crowell Oct 20 '13 at 20:03

A first answer that cames to my mind is "why shouldn't it?".

More seriously (if your question is serious). First, you should notice that the original version of TDSE is $$i\hbar\dot\psi = H\psi$$ so you actually already have an $i$ there. However, notice that this is not required to have complex solutions. For example, the equation (second order in space) $$ \frac{d^2f}{dx^2} = -af $$ has absolutely real coefficients, but also has complex solutions, for example of the kind $$ Ae^{ix}+Be^{-ix}$$ You might be interested in knowing that those can also be written in real form as a linear combination of sine and cosine.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.