Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can somebody explain what it means when one says a Hamiltonian is SU(2) invariant? I know Heisenberg Hamiltonian is SU(2) invariant but why?

share|cite|improve this question
It means that if one performs an SU(2) transformation, the Hamiltonian will retain its original form. – Danu Oct 14 '13 at 10:01
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Heisenberg's Hamiltonian, if I understood what you're referring to, is a Hamiltonian operator for a system whose components are a family of spins. What is relevant here is that $H$ is a sum of terms of the kind $\mathbf{s}_i\cdot\mathbf{s}_j$.

$SU(2)$ is a group of transformations which in this case represents rotations (it is the covering of the $SO(3)$ rotation group and is used for spin, see for example here).

Now, why should we expect the hamiltonian to be invariant with respect to rotations? Because whenever you have a scalar product between two spin vectors, you simply obtain something proportional to $\cos\theta$, where $\theta$ is the angle between the two. This value does not change with a rotation of the reference frame, because involves only the relative position of the two spins. This is the physical explanation of this invariance. Mathematically, one could try to directly perform the transformation on the Hamiltonian.

I'm not sure about this, but I think it should be done as $H' = D H D^\dagger$ where $D$ is the rotation operator $D=\exp(-\frac{i\phi}{\hbar}\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{S})$ (see here).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.