Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to relate the surface-area-to-volume-ratio of a sphere to the Bekenstein bound. Since the surface-area-to-volume-ratio decreases with increasing volume, one would surmise that, per unit of volume, a small space is richer in information than a large one. How can this be and how can this bound work for black holes of various sizes?

Thank you very much Mr. Rennie. I appreciate and have investigated your answer. It turns out that I am familiar with the AdS/CFT correspondence and have sufficient understanding of the math (just barely) to be intrigued with the conjecture and, of course, the holographic theory. If the correspondence only works for a certain diameter black hole, the conjecture seems, to me, weak because of the changing surface-area-to-volume-ratio of a sphere. For myself, it would appear to be, likely, a mathematical curiosity or fluke. However, if, through some aspect that I do not understand, the correspondence holds for varying diameters, in fact, all diameters of black holes, then it seems quite astonishing, indeed. After searching for some time, I have once seen the amount described as trivial and possibly in another instance, that it may have something to do with informational redundancy. I’m afraid I cannot site these references as they were far too brief to be of any help.

share|improve this question
    
You ask "How can this be?". If I had a really good answer to that I would be writing off to Stockholm for my Nobel prize. As far as I know (which is not much) the AdS/CFT conjecture (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence) is the best currently known approach to the issue. –  John Rennie Oct 4 '13 at 14:20
    
blogs.discovermagazine.com/outthere/2013/08/20/… I think this answers my question. Apparently I understand the concept and can follow the math but I fail to believe it. As a black hole gets bigger and bigger, it is less and less dense, until eventually it isn't particularly dense at all. Faith in mathematics would seem to be my issue. Thank you for your help. Jim McKenzie. –  Jim McKenzie Nov 30 '13 at 18:19

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.