Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a (probably) advanced question, concerning quantum process tomography. Let's say I have made a measurement with a single qubit, and calculated a $\chi$-matrix which looks like $$\begin{bmatrix}0&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0\end{bmatrix}.$$ What's the physical interpretation for this, and why do I need a 4$\times$4 matrix for describing a 1 qubit system?

share|cite|improve this question
The notation "$\chi$-matrix" is not standard. Could you point out where you read this? – Emilio Pisanty Sep 20 '13 at 15:20
of course: The standard recipe is described in Nielsen-Chuang: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, chapter-quantum process tomography. The "same" infos can be found here:… – wa4557 Sep 20 '13 at 17:41
up vote 1 down vote accepted

I took a quantum information course last semester and we only touched quantum process tomography very briefly, so I'm no expert, but from what I understand from Nielsen & Chuang, I mighty still be able to give an answer to your questions.

The goal of process tomography is to find a set of operators $\{E_i\}$ which describes the effect of a superoperator $\mathcal E$ on density matrices, $\mathcal E(\rho)=\sum_iE_i\rho E_i^\dagger$. For a qubit, the density matrices are from $\mathbb C^{2\times 2}$ and so are the operators $E_i$. Now, as the $E_i$s are initially unknown, we have to express them in some (arbitrarily chosen) basis of $\mathbb C^{2\times 2}$. The standard choice is $(I, X, Y, Z)$, i.e. the identity and the Pauli matrices. The particular choice of this basis (and the order of the basis matrices) will be important in the interpretation of $\chi$. Now, referring to those basis matrices as $\tilde E_m$, we may write

$E_i = \sum_m e_{im}\tilde E_m$

with coefficients $e_{im}$. Substituting the above, one gets for the superoperator

$\mathcal E(\rho) = \sum_{m,n}\left(\sum_ie_{im}e_{in}^*\right)\tilde E_m\rho\tilde E_n^\dagger = \sum_{m,n}\chi_{mn}\tilde E_m\rho\tilde E_n^\dagger$.

So, the reason why the $\chi$ matrix is $4\times 4$ for a single qubit is that the vector space for the operators on single qubits is four-dimensional. In general, a superoperator on a quantum system with a $d$-dimensional Hilbert space will be representable in terms of a $d^2\times d^2$ $\chi$ matrix.

The physical interpretation of the $\chi$ matrix you gave above depends on the choice of basis, as I mentioned before. In the conventional identity+Paulis basis, it means that $\mathcal E(\rho) = X\rho X$, i.e. the quantum process in simply a quantum NOT gate.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.