Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am looking for an appropriate derivation of the $(\frac{d}{dt})_{\text{laboratory}} = (\frac{d}{dt})_{\text{rotating}} + \omega \times $ relationship that enables one to calculate all desired quantities in a rotating referece frame. Does anybody know a good way how to understand this transformation?

share|improve this question
1  
Your equation looks incomplete. –  udiboy1209 Aug 24 '13 at 16:00
2  
Could you be more specific? –  user180097 Aug 24 '13 at 17:00
    
$\frac d{dt}$ of what? and $\omega \times$ what? –  udiboy1209 Aug 25 '13 at 15:37
    
it is an operator relationship, so you would apply it to a vector in a particular reference system. –  user180097 Aug 25 '13 at 16:57
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The components of any vector function can be written any any desired basis. In particular, let \begin{align} \mathbf A_L(t) = (A^1_L(t) , A^2_L(t), A^3_L(t)) \end{align} denote the components of a vector function as written in an orthonormal basis fixed in the laboratory, and let \begin{align} \mathbf A_R(t) = (A^1_R(t), A^2_R(t), A^3_R(t)) \end{align} denote the components of the same vector as written in a rotating orthonormal basis. These components will be related by a time-dependent special orthogonal matrix (rotation); \begin{align} \mathbf A_L(t) = R(t)\mathbf A_R(t) \end{align} In particular, note that taking time derivatives on both sides gives \begin{align} \dot{\mathbf A}_L(t) &= R(t) \dot{\mathbf A}_R(t) + \dot R(t) \mathbf A_R(t) \\ &= R(t) \dot{\mathbf A}_R(t) + \dot R(t) R(t)^T\mathbf A_L(t) \end{align} Since $R(t)$ is an orthogonal matrix, we have \begin{align} R(t)R(t)^T = I \end{align} and taking derivatives of both sides, and using the fact that time derivatives and matrix transposes commute, we find that \begin{align} \dot R(t) R(t)^T = -(\dot R(t)R(t)^T)^T \end{align} in other words, $\dot R(t) R(t)^T$ is an antisymmetric matrix. We lose no generality by therefore writing \begin{align} \dot R(t) R(t)^T = \Omega(t) \end{align} where \begin{align} \Omega(t) = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -\omega^3(t) & \omega^2(t) \\ \omega^3(t) & 0 & -\omega^1(t) \\ -\omega^2(t) & \omega^1(t) & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix} \end{align} for some vector of functions $\boldsymbol\omega=(\omega^1, \omega^2, \omega^3$). Therefore, we have \begin{align} \dot {\mathbf A}_L(t) = R(t)\dot{\mathbf A}_R(t) + \Omega(t)\mathbf A_L(t) \end{align} It is straightforward to explicitly show that multiplication by $\Omega(t)$ is equivalent to a cross product by $\boldsymbol\omega(t)$, so we can write \begin{align} \Omega(t) \mathbf A_L(t) = \boldsymbol\omega(t)\times\mathbf A_L(t) \end{align} and we are therefore let to the expression \begin{align} \boxed{\dot{\mathbf A}_L(t) = R(t)\dot{\mathbf A}_R(t) + \boldsymbol\omega(t)\times\mathbf A_L(t)} \end{align} If we make the identifications \begin{align} \dot{\mathbf A}_L(t) &=\left(\frac{d\mathbf A}{dt}\right)_\mathrm{laboratory} \\ R(t)\dot{\mathbf A}_R(t) &=\left(\frac{d\mathbf A}{dt}\right)_\mathrm{rotating} \end{align} then we see that this is equivalent to your formula. In my opinion, the physicist notation in the formula you wrote down is extremely confusing, and I prefer to use the more descriptive notation in the boxed expression above; I find that it leads to less errors and is more conceptually clear.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I'll consider two-dimensional reference frames, and i will use galilean transformation, adapted to your particular problem. Here is how i imagine this: enter image description here

Here, $\vec{r}$ is the position vector of a point, as seen from the laboratory frame; $\vec{r_0}$ is the position vector of the center of the other (moving) frame; and $\vec{r'}$ is the position of the point as seen from the primed frame. Note that $\vec{r'}$ will describe a circle, so we can write it as: $$\vec{r'}=r'\cos(\omega t) \vec{i}+r'\sin(\omega t) \vec{j}$$ (assuming that the particle starts at an angle $0$ when $t=0$).

Now, clearly, we have $\vec{r}=\vec{r_0}+\vec{r'}$. Differentiating this with respect to time, we get: $$ {\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}}={\frac{d\vec{r_0}}{dt}}+{\frac{d\vec{r'}}{dt}}$$

which is the same as $$\vec{v}=\vec{v_0}+\vec{v'}$$ where $\vec{v}$ is the speed as seen from the laboratory frame, $\vec{v_0}$ is the speed of the moving frame, and $\vec{v'}$ is the speed in the moving frame.

But $\vec{v'}={\frac{d\vec{r'}}{dt}}=-\omega r'\sin(\omega t)\vec{i}+\omega r'\sin(\omega t)\vec{j}$, so that we finally get: $$\vec{v}=\vec{v_0}+\omega r' [-\sin(\omega t)\vec{i}+\cos(\omega t)\vec{j}]$$

To find the accelerations, you can differentiate again this relation.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.