Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In this paper the authors refer to

transverse susceptibility $\chi_{ \perp}$ [meV $^{−1}$]

I was taught that the magnetic susceptibility is dimensionless.

How do I get $\chi$ in the above units??

share|improve this question
    
In one place it is given in emu/mol, whatever that may be. –  Georg Mar 23 '11 at 22:06
    
Excellent question :) –  David Z Mar 23 '11 at 23:12
    
At any rate, whatever you were taught, it's clear that $\chi_\perp$, defined as a coefficient in equation 2 of that paper, has the unit of inverse energy, just like they indicate. $\int d^3 x$ cancels against $abc$, one time derivative cancels against $\partial_t$, the other $\partial_t$ combined with one $\hbar$ gives one energy which has to be cancelled for $S$ to have the right dimension of the other $\hbar$. So maybe you should have already asked a different question about the previous texts such as eqn 2. $\chi_\perp$ is apparently normalized differently than you think. –  Luboš Motl May 4 '11 at 11:40
add comment

1 Answer

Magnetic susceptibility is a static constant relating the amount of magnetization to the applied magnetic field; it is dimensionless. Transverse susceptibility is a measure of the magnetic response of a material to an alternating field; it is not dimensionless. The transverse susceptibility is often used when talking to the ferromagnetic resonance (like I think they are doing in the paper you cite) of a material.

So the short answer is that MS is dimensionless and TS is not.

share|improve this answer
    
Ok, this is something I didn't know. Anyway, as Georg already mentioned, the authors use the value given in emu/mol to evaluate $\chi _{\perp}$. How should I convert between these units? –  Pie86 Mar 24 '11 at 8:37
    
I could not find the TS given in emu/mol. emu/mol are the units of molar susceptibility. Molar susceptibility is postulated in Curie's law for paramagnetic material. Though I must admit this is a dense paper (and not in my field) so in order to keep it from taking up my morning I've just been skimming it. –  AOA Mar 24 '11 at 16:34
    
It's in the caption of "Table 1" (near the end). Anyway I want to thank you for your help and the precious information about TS. –  Pie86 Mar 24 '11 at 20:10
    
'emu' should only be used as a shorthand IMHO. It is difficult to convert without context, and is an unfortunate cgs anachronism. It stands for "electromagnetic unit" and can mean simply the volume of a field (here it usually means cm^3) or it can mean magnetic moment (erg/G). I suspect that if I was more familiar with operating an NMR I would be able to give you a better crafted answer. –  AOA Mar 25 '11 at 3:44
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.