Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am struggling with a derivation that calculates the cross sections for Mie scattering and since the incident light is considered to be a x-polarized plane wave I thought that we would have $$I_i = \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon}{\mu}} \vert E_0 \vert^2$$, but I do not understand this derivation then, since a factor $2 \pi $ seems to be missing.

It starts with an expression for the scattered field, explains how they got this expression by using some orthogonality properties and then - in my opinion argue - that this $Re(g_n)=1$. But then I do not understand what they take as the incident intensity in order to get the expression $C_{sca}$. Does anybody have an idea?

$$ W_s=\frac{\pi|E_0|^2}{k\omega\mu}\sum_{n=1}^\infty(2n+1)\mathcal{Re}\{g_n\}(|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2), $$ where we have used (4.24) and the relation $$ \int_0^\pi(\pi_n\pi_m+\tau_n\tau_m)\sin{\theta}\text{ }d\theta=\delta_{n\text{ }m}\frac{2n^2(n+1)^2}{2n+1}, $$ which follows from (4.27). The quantity $g_n$, is defined as - $i\xi_n^*\xi_n^{'}$, may be written in form $$ g_n=(\chi_n^*\psi_n^{'}-\psi_n^*\chi_n^{'})-i(\psi_n^*\psi_n^{'}+\chi_n^*\chi_n^{'}), $$ where the Riccati-Bessel function $\chi_n$ is - $\rho y_n(\rho)$ and, therefore, $\xi_n=\psi_n-i\chi_n$. The functions $\psi_n$ and $\chi_n$ are real for real argument; therefore, if we use the Wronskian(Antosiewicz, 1964) $$ \chi_n\psi_n^{'}-\psi_n\chi_n^{'}=1,\tag{4.60} $$ it follows that the scattering cross section is $$ C_{sca}=\frac{W_s}{I_i}=\frac{2\pi}{k^2}\sum_{n=1}^\infty(2n+1)(|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2).\tag{4.61} $$

share|cite|improve this question
Which book is this? – whatever Apr 3 '14 at 10:20
up vote 1 down vote accepted

I want to add this as a comment but dont have enough rep, so please dont downvote me lol, but the incident intensity comes from the expansion coefficients $a_n$ and $b_n$. Look further back in the book to see the equation they appear in.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.